DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.127.2026.53-60

This scientific article systematizes the key characteristics of networked production systems through a complex set of technical, technological, organizational, information, and management components. Four vectors for implementing the network approach are identified: networked resource combination; networked delivery of finished parts; creating conditions for network participants through a rating system, crowdsourcing, and distributed project financing; and creating a favorable climate for the digital retirement of obsolete elements, ensuring dynamic updating of the network composition and the redistribution of resources in favor of the most effective participants. The author’s methodology and results for calculating the economic impact are also presented.

References:

1. Abdikeev N.M. The concept of competitive value chains in production systems as an institutional structure functioning on network principles / N.M. Abdikeev, A.A. Losev, A.I. Gaidamaka. Computational Nanotechnology. 2019;6(3):61-67. DOI 10.33693/2313-223X-2019-6-3-61-67.

2. Beletskaya S.Yu., Bokova N.V. Principles of algorithmization of problems of optimal design of complex production systems. Optimization and modeling in automated systems: interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Voronezh: Voronezh State Technical University, 2009. pp. 105-112.

3. Wang C. Approaches to the principles of operation of a network organization in an automobile cluster. Scientific aspect. 2023;10(12):1194-1206.

4. Dorogov Yu.V., Ionov B.P. Optimization of production processes of a shipbuilding design bureau based on the principles of functioning of an electronic information logistics system. Marine Bulletin. 2023;1(85):47-51. DOI 10.56192/18123694_2023_1_47.

5. Zhukovskaya I.V. Segmentation of the service market: problems and solutions. Microeconomics. 2021;2:32-37.

6. Losev A.A. System of models of an inter-industry digital platform for managing and optimizing the cooperation of high-tech networked production systems / A.A. Losev, N.M. Abdikeev, A.I. Gaidamaka. Managing the development of large-scale systems, October 1-3, 2019 / Under the general editorship of S.N. Vasiliev, A.D. Tsvirkun. Moscow: V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019. pp. 390-392. DOI 10.25728/mlsd.2019.1.0390.

7. Myasnikova, Yu.V. Improving the efficiency of production systems for functional control of complex products based on the formation of information systems: specialty 05.02.22 — Organization of production (by industry): dissertation for the degree of candidate of technical sciences. Samara National Research University named after Academician S.P. Korolev, Samara, 2019. 177 p.

8. Maltseva M.N., Tsvirkunov D.I. Application of lean manufacturing principles in the design of management systems and production systems. Certification. 2017;2:9-13.

9. Development of models of production and business processes of network enterprises based on multi-agent systems / Yu.F. Telnov, V.A. Kazakov, A.V. Danilov, A.A. Bryzgalov. Software products and systems. 2023;4:632-643. DOI 10.15827/0236-235X.144.632-643.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.127.2026.12-19

The effectiveness of China’s institutional system and policy tools in achieving technological sovereignty (TS) is evident in specific examples. The article analyzes the most significant achievements in the fundamental industries of the new technological order (TO): microelectronics, 5G, quantum computing, artificial intelligence, supercomputers, robotics, and new materials. China has successfully narrowed the gap with global leaders and achieved global leadership in several sectors (5G, robotics), which is crucial for national security and competitiveness.

References:

1. Glazyev S. Yu. The Chinese Economic Miracle. Lessons for Russia and the World. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishing House, 2023. 406 p.

2. Made in China 2025. State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2015. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-05/19/content_9784.htm

3. SMIC. Annual Report 2022. Available at: https://www.sminvestments.com/publication/smic-integrated-annual-corporate-governance-report-for-year-ended-2022/

4. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). Final Rule on Additional Export Controls to the PRC, 2022.

5. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Annual Report 2023.

6. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Index 2023.

7. Who is leading the 5G patent race? IPlytics, 2021. URL: https://www.iam-media.com/article/who-leading-the-5g-patent-race-patent-landscape-analysis-declared-seps-and-standards-contributions

8. China’s quantum processor Zuchongzhi 3.2 achieves global parity. Global Times, 2025. URL: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202512/1351319.shtml

9. Next-generation AI development plan. State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2017. URL: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-07/20/content_5211996.htm

10. TOP500.org. November 2023 TOP500 List, 2023. URL: https://www.top500.org/lists/top500/list/2023/11/

11. China Optoelectronic Display Industry Investment Report 2025. CINNO Research, 2025.

12. China Additive Manufacturing Industry Alliance. 2025 China Additive Manufacturing Industry Development Report, 2026.

13. Made in China 2025. State Council of the PRC, 2025.

14. China Sensor & Internet of Things Industry Alliance. Sensor Industry White Paper 2025.

15. Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025. Stanford University, 2025.

16. TOP500.org. June 2025 TOP500 List, 2025. URL: https://serverflow.ru/blog/stati/top500-iyun-2025-chto-novogo-v-reytinge-luchshikh-superkompyuterov/

17. World Robotics 2022 Report. International Federation of Robotics (IFR), 2022.

18. White Paper on China’s Robotics Industry. China Institute of Electronics, 2023.

19. Research Report on China’s Robotics Industry. Goldman Sachs Asia, 2023.

20. Annual Report 2023. National Silicon Industry Group, 2023.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-1.126.2025.27-41

The article analyzes China’s model for achieving technological sovereignty, traces its historical evolution, describes its institutional system, outlines the key state governance tools used in this process, and provides concrete examples of outcomes achieved. Understanding China’s experience in achieving technological sovereignty through instruments and mechanisms of strategic state governance is of great relevance for implementing similar Russian plans and aligning the EAEU with China’s global Belt and Road Initiative. The scientific novelty of the study lies in identifying the institutional mechanism of the guided transition to a new technological paradigm using China as a case study, as well as in systematizing the tools of strategic state governance that enable the reproduction of technological sovereignty. The methodological basis of the study is an institutional evolutionary analysis within the framework of technological paradigm shift theory.

References:

1. Glazyev S.Yu. Managing Economic Development: A Lecture Course. 2019. 759 p.

2. Arrighi G. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. L.: Verso, 1994.

3. Glazyev S.Yu. The Last World War. The USA Starts and Loses. Knizhnny Mir, 2016. (Izborsky Club Collection).

4. Gallagher K.S. The Globalization of Clean Energy Technology: Lessons from China. The MIT Press, 2019.

5. Liu X. Cheng P. National Strategy of Indigenous Innovation and its Implication to China. URL: (PDF) National Strategy of Indigenous Innovation and its Implications to China

6. 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要 URL: https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2006/content_240244.htm

7. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2015, May 19). «Made in China 2025» (《中国制造2025》). Retrieved from the official website of the Central Government of the People’s Republic of China. URL: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-05/19/content_9784.htm

8. 国家集成电路产业投资基金 URL：https://baike.baidu.com/item/国家集成电路产业投资基金/15891498

9. 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要 URL: https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2006/content_240244.htm

10. Physics Today. (n.d.). China’s 15-year science and technology plan. URL: https://physicstoday.aip.org/features/chinas-15-year-science-and-technology-plan

11. U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC). China’s Indigenous Innovation Policy. 2011. URL: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/5.4.11Wolff.pdf

12. Stanford Digital China Lab. (n.d.). Lexicon: Indigenous Innovation or Independent Innovation (自主创新, Zìzhǔ Chuàngxīn). URL: https://digichina.stanford.edu/work/lexicon-indigenous-innovation-or-independent-innovation-zizhu-chuangxin/

13. Li X., Liu Y. China’s innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory. Research Policy. 2011;40(7):917-931. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733311000709

DOI: 10.33917/mic-1.126.2026.12-26

The article examines models, factors, and conditions for Russia’s development of scientific and technical potential, and suggests a number of adjustments to the regulatory system governing scientific and technological advancement in education, research, and industry, which could serve as a basis for a set of actions aimed at enhancing strategic management and securing Russia’s technological independence.

References:

1. Afanasyev A.A. Technological sovereignty as a scientific category within the system of contemporary knowledge. Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2022;12(9):2377-2394.

2. Lenchuk E.B. Scientific and technological development as a strategic national priority of Russia. The economic revival of Russia. 2022;1 (71):58-65.

3. Kalinenko N.L. Import Substitution and Technological Sovereignty. Education and Law. 2023;11:87-91.

4. Yurevich M.A. Technological sovereignty in Russia: Concept, measurement and possibility of achieving it. Questions of Theoretical Economics. 2023;4:7-21.

5. Shkodinsky S.V., Prodchenko I.A., Matyuhin V.N. Contours of modern Russia’s industrial policy to ensure the country’s technological independence. Bulletin of the Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2024;6(1):3-12.

6. Ostapuk S.F., Kupriianova L.P., Fetisova V.P. Organizational and legal solutions to ensure technological sovereignty. Moscow, INFRA-М, 2025. 326 p.

DOI: 10.33917/es-6.204.2025.56-63

The article presents the author’s approach to technological sovereignty based on data from the international assessment, conducted by the UN. The author proposes a concept for representing technological sovereignty in the form of three components (structural elements): information and communication security (digital security), infrastructural (logistics) security and scientific-technological security. To assess each component of technological sovereignty it is proposed to use the corresponding indicators, grouped in accordance with the author’s approach. In addition, the article provides the author’s analysis of countries that have achieved Goal 9 of the Sustainable Development based on statistical data, provided by the UN, and the corresponding threshold values for each indicator of the countries under consideration.

References:

1. Potaptseva E.V., Akberdina V.V. Tekhnologicheskiy suverenitet: ponyatie, soderzhanie i formy realizatsii [Technological Sovereignty: Concept, Content and Forms of Implementation]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika, 2023, vol. 25, no 3, pp. 5–16.

2. Strategiya nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya Soyuznogo gosudarstva na period do 2035 goda [Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Union State for the Period up to 2035]. Informatsionno-analiticheskiy portal Soyuznogo gosudarstva. 2024. 31 yanvarya, available at: https://soyuz.by/projects/dekrety-vysshego-gosudarstvennogo-soveta-soyuznogo-gosudarstva/postanovlenie-ot-29-yanvarya-2024-g-2-o-strategii-nauchno-tehnologicheskogo-razvitiya-soyuznogo-gosudarstva-na-period-do-2035-goda

3. Tseli v oblasti ustoychivogo razvitiya [Sustainable Development Goals]. OON. Tseli v oblasti ustoychivogo razvitiya, available at: https://www.un.org/ sustainabledevelopment/ru/infrastructure-industrialization/#tab-a971aadac89bd5b8b3a

4. The SDGS in action. UNDP, available at: https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals

5. Sustainable development report 2019, available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2019/2019_sustainable_development_ report.pdf

6. Sustainable development report 2020, available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2020/2020_sustainable_development_ report.pdf

7. Sustainable development report 2021, available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2021/2021-sustainable-development-report.pdf

8. Sustainable development report 2022, available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2022/2022-sustainable-development-report.pdf

9. Sustainable development report 2023, available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2023/sustainable-development-report-2023.pdf

10. Sustainable development report 2024, available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2024/sustainable-development-report-2024.pdf

DOI: 10.33917/es-5.203.2025.74-85

This article examines a successful case of localizing production of tapered axlebox bearings for innovative railway wagons in Russia. The above project was implemented in conditions of high dependence on foreign supplies and restrictions related to international sanctions. The author analyzes in detail economic, technological and organizational aspects of the project, implemented with active government support through a mechanism of special investment contract (SPIC 2.0). The importance of comprehensive industrial policy measures, including tax incentives, financing through the Industrial Development Fund and regulatory support in the context of sanctions pressure is demonstrated. Project implementation resulted in 100% localization of a critical component of railway engineering, providing technological sovereignty, maintaining sustainability of the rail transport and creating production infrastructure of a new technological level. The present case confirms effectiveness of interaction between the government, business and key consumers in implementing strategically significant industrial initiatives.

References:

1. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 20 aprelya 2024 g. N 981 [Order of the Government of the Russian Federation dated April 20, 2024 No. 981]. Garant, available at: https://base.garant.ru/408964851/

2. Uralvagonzavod: Deyatel’nost’ [Uralvagonzavod: Activities]. RUVIKI, available at: https://ru.ruwiki.ru/wiki/Уралвагонзавод

3. Proizvodstvo magistral’nykh gruzovykh vagonov v RF v 2012 g. vyroslo na 13,3% [Production of Mainline Freight Cars in the Russian Federation Increased by 13.3% in 2012]. RZhD-Partner.ru, 2013, 25 yanvarya, available at: https://www.rzd-partner.ru/zhd-transport/news/proizvodstvo-magistral%27nykhgruzovykh-vagonov-v-rf-v-2012-g—vyroslo-na-13-3/?ysclid=maxxsokfg5747409299

4. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF ot 17 iyulya 2015 g. N 719 (red. ot 23 dekabrya 2024 g.) “O podtverzhdenii proizvodstva rossiyskoy promyshlennoy produktsii” [Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 17, 2015 No. 719 (as amended on December 23, 2024) “On confirmation of the production of Russian industrial products”]. Konsul’tantPlyuc, available at: http://login.consultant.ru/link/?req=doc&base=LAW&n=494410&dst=100001&date= 10.01.2025

5. Shulepov A.A. Podshipnikovaya otrasl’ v RF: tekushchee sostoyanie i perspektivy [Bearing Industry in the Russian Federation: Current State and Prospects]. Innovatsii i investitsii, 2024, no 7, pp. 359–364.

6. Postanovlenie ot 23 marta 2021 g. N 446 “O vnesenii izmeneniy v prilozhenie k postanovleniyu Pravitel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 17 iyulya 2015 g. N 719” (s izm. i dop.) [Resolution of March 23, 2021 No. 446 “On Amendments to the Appendix to the Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 17, 2015 No. 719”]. Garant, available at: ht tps://base.garant.ru/400494581/

DOI: 10.33917/es-4.202.2025.86-97

The article analyzes socio-economic situation of workers in the mining industry (from 2019 to 2025) and identifies trends in transition from traditional to innovative tools in the personnel’s work activities. It was also discovered that introduction of artificial intelligence technologies helps to minimize the human factor and ensures maximum production ef ficiency.

The present article also examines transformation of the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the mining industry representatives, their social consequences, in particular, the impact of mining work on psychophysical health.

The paper also studies development of a nonlinear algorithm with the help of ar tificial intelligence methods, including a neural network and cognitive modules, as a factor in transition from traditional to innovative tools in the work of mining personnel, having direct significance for humans.

References:

1. Anchishkin A.I. Nauka, tekhnika, ekonomika [Science, Technology, Economics]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 1986. 383 p.

2. Kheynman S.A. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya revolyutsiya segodnya i zavtra [Scientific and Technological Revolution Today and Tomorrow]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1977, 328 p.

3. L’vov D.S. Effektivnoe upravlenie tekhnicheskim razvitiem [Effective Management of Technical Development]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 1990, 255 p.

4. L’vov D.S., Glaz’ev S.Yu. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty upravleniya NTP [Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Scientific and Technical Progress Management]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody, 1986, no 5, pp. 793–804.

5. Glaz’ev S.Yu. Teoriya dolgosrochnogo tekhniko-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Theory of Long-Term Technical and Economic Development]. Moscow, Vladar, 1993, 310 p.

6. Peres K. Tekhnologicheskie revolyutsii i finansovyy kapital. Dinamika puzyrey i periodov protsvetaniya [Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. Dynamics of Bubbles and Periods of Prosperity]. Moscow, Delo, 2011, 232 p.

7. Dosi G. Technical Change and Industrial Transformation: The Patterns of Industrial Dynamics. Technical Change and Industrial Transformation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. 1984. 338 p.

8. Perez C. Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems. Futures, 1983, vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 357–375.

9. Freeman C. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London, Pinter Publishers, 1987. 155 p.

10. Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, vol. 52, iss. 6, 2023, 104765.

11. Erebak S., Turgut T. Anxiety about the speed of technological development: Effects on job insecurity, time estimation, and automation level preference. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 32, iss. 2, 2021, 100419.

12. Eum W., Lee J-D. The co-evolution of production and technological capabilities during industrial development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 63, 2022, pp. 454–469.

DOI: 10.33917/es-3.201.2025.6-13

The article dwells on the role of technological sovereignty in ensuring the country’s sustainable development. The authors examine the concept of technological sovereignty, its main components and its relationship with economic, social and environmental sustainability. Particular attention is paid to analysis of the key areas for strengthening technological sovereignty, including the development of a research base, stimulation of innovation, personnel training and government support. Examples of Russia and other countries show successful practices and challenges related to achieving technological independence. It is shown that technological sovereignty is a necessary condition for sustainable development, allowing to reduce dependence on external factors and ensure the country’s long-term innovative development. In conclusion, the authors put forward recommendations for forming a comprehensive strategy for technological development based on strengthening scientific potential and creating a favourable environment for innovation.

References: 

1. Razvitie ekonomicheskikh sistem: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika: Monografiya (nauchnoe izdanie) [Development of Economic Systems: Theory, Methodology, Practice: Monograph (Scientific Edition)]. FGAOU VO “Samarskiy natsional’nyy issledovatel’skiy universitet imeni akademika S.P. Koroleva, et al; pod. red. B.N. Gerasimova. Penza, PGAU, 2024, 275 p.

2. Trusina I., Ermolaeva E., Abramov V., Gopeenko V. Otsenka mirovogo razvitiya v invariantnoy sisteme koordinat energeticheskikh edinits: perspektivy novykh industrial’nykh ekonomik [Assessment of Global Development in an Invariant Coordinate System of Energy Units: Prospects for New Industrial Economies]. Zhurnal infrastruktury, politiki i razvitiya, 2024, no 8(1):3110, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i1.3110

3. Afanas’ev A.A. Tekhnologicheskiy suverenitet kak nauchnaya kategoriya v sisteme sovremennogo znaniya [Technological Sovereignty as a Scientific Category in the System of Modern Knowledge]. Ekonomika, predprinimatel’stvo i pravo, 2022, vol. 12, no 9, pp. 2377–2394.

4. Kvint V.L., Novikova I.V., Alimuradov M.K., Sasaev N.I. Strategirovanie tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta natsional’noy ekonomiki [Strategizing the Technological Sovereignty of the National Economy]. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie, 2022, no 9, pp. 57–67, DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2022-9-57-67

5. Baydarov D.Yu., Faykov D.Yu. Na puti k tekhnologicheskomu suverenitetu: teoreticheskie podkhody, praktika, predlozheniya [On the Way to Technological Sovereignty: Theoretical Approaches, Practice, Proposals]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, 2023, no 1, pp. 23–34.

6. Abramov V.I., Gavrilyuk A.V., Putilov A.V. Sravnenie podkhodov k obespecheniyu tekhnologicheskogo suvereniteta v raznykh stranakh: Trendy razvitiya sovremennogo obshchestva: upravlencheskie, pravovye, ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye aspekty: Sb. nauchnykh statey 14-y Vserossiyskoy nauchnoprakticheskoy konferentsii [Comparison of Approaches to Ensuring Technological Sovereignty in Different Countries: Trends in the Development of Modern Society: Managerial, Legal, Economic and Social Aspects: Collection of scientific articles of the 14th All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference]. Kursk, Universitetskaya kniga, 2024, pp. 15–21.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.121.2025.14-23

Globalisation, accompanied by the industrial leadership of «developed countries», is being replaced by regionalisation, which is built on conditions of equality and cooperation in common interests. The EU and the Eurasian Economic Union are illustrative examples of the international organisation of regional economic integration. In the context of changes in the architecture of the global technological system, the EAEU faces the task of deepening scientific and technical co-operation. On the agenda is the issue of reducing the level of import dependence in a number of types of finished products, the solution to these issues is associated with the involvement of research base: Eurasian technology platforms, the work of which is aimed at consolidating the scientific potential of the EAEU countries on the way to achieving technological sovereignty. The article analyses the organisation of scientific and technical cooperation in the EU in order to use this experience to solve problems and justify the prospects of scientific and technical cooperation and industrial cooperation within the EAEU.

References:

1. Decision of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council of 11.12.2020 No. 12: Strategic Directions for the Development of Eurasian Economic Integration until 2025. Effective date: 12.01.2021.

2. Platonova I.N. et al. International Economic Relations in the Global Economy: textbook for universities. Moscow: Yurait, 2023. 528 p.

3. Smitienko B.M. et al. World Economy in 2 Parts. Part 1: textbook for universities / edited by B.M. Smitienko, N.V. Lukyanovich. – 4th ed., revised. and additional. Moscow: Yurait, 2023. 216 p.

4. Ignatova O.V., Orlova N.L., Gorbunova O.A., Ason T.A. Global Economy and International Economic Relations. Workshop: Textbook for Universities / edited by O.V. Ignatova. Moscow: Yurait, 2023. 212 p.

5. Glazyev S.Yu. Problems of Development of Eurasian Economic Integration: How to Resolve Them? Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2022; 3 (41). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-razvitiya-evraziyskoy-ekonomicheskoy-integratsii-kak-ih-razreshit

6. Glazyev S.Yu. On Strategic Directions of Development of the EAEU. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2020;1 (31). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-strategicheskih-napravleniyah-razvitiya-eaes

7. Glazyev S.Yu. EAEU – EU: Prospects for a Comprehensive Economic Agreement. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2019;4 (30). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/eaes-es-perspektivy-vseobemlyuschego-ekonomicheskogo-soglasheniya

8. Glazyev S.Yu., Tkachuk S.P. On the Parameters of Economic Development in the EAEU until 2035. International Trade and Trade Policy. 2023;9(1):90–112.

9. Federal State Statistics Service. URL: https://www.gks.ru/

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.96-101

Over the past three centuries, economic liberalism has emerged as a global cultural norm that permeates international institutions and business practices. Global turbulence has coincided with degradation of the idea of liberalism; corporate leaders feel the need for change, but don’t associate the transformation goals with exhaustion of the liberal model.

References:

1. Vtulkina N., Firsov A. Khrupkaya, trevozhnaya, nelineynaya, nepostizhimaya [Fragile, Disturbing, Non-linear, Incomprehensible]. Forbes, 2022, 5 sentyabrya, available at: https://www.forbes.ru/forbeslife/476185-vse-v-bani-pocemu-tak-nazyvaetsa-novaa-trevoznaa-epoha-i-kak-v-nej-zit

2. Bashnin A.V., Ozols O.K. Kto upravlyaet IT krupnykh industrial’nykh kompaniy? [Who Manages the IT of Large Industrial Companies?]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2024, no 3(195), pp. 60–67, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-3.195.2024.60-67

3. Belousov L.V. Biologicheskiy morfogenez [Biological Morphogenesis]. Moscow, URSS, 2023, 256 p.

4. Wonga M.L., Cleland C.E., Arend D.J., Bartlettd S., Cleaves H.J., Demarestc H., Prabhua A., Lunineg J.I., Hazen R.M. On the roles of function and selection in evolving systems. PNAS, 2023, vol. 120, no 43, e2310223120.

5. Sharma A., Czégel D., Lachmann M., Kempes C.P., Walker S.I., Cronin L. Assembly theory explains and quantifies selection and evolution. Nature, vol. 622, October 12, 2023.

6. Budanov V.G. Metodologiya sinergetiki v postneklassicheskoy nauke i v obrazovanii [Synergetics Methodology in Post-nonclassical Science and Education]. Moscow, LKI, 2009, 240 p.