2024 — Year of the Family. New Measures to Support the Birth Rate in Russia

DOI: 10.33917/es-4.196.2024.114-123

Recently Russia has been actively searching for a way out of the demographic crisis. A timely response to internal demographic problems became the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin, according to which 2024 has been declared the Year of the Family. Focus on popularizing family values shows that the problem is becoming more and more pertinent, and no effective solutions have been found to date.

Demographic problem in general is widely discussed in Russia, attempts are made to reverse the negative trend with the help of various economic measures. However, any significant progress hasn’t yet been achieved. In this regard, new views and approaches to solving this problem are extremely in demand.

References:

1. Goncharova N.P., Eremin A.A., Tarasova E.V. K voprosu o metodike otsenki rezul’tativnosti demograficheskoy politiki. Demograficheskiy potentsial stran EAES: VIII Ural’skiy demograficheskiy forum [On the Methodology for Assessing the Effectiveness of Demographic Policy: Demographic Potential of the EAEU Countries: VIII Ural Demographic Forum]. Vol. II. Ekaterinburg, Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN, 2017, pp. 77–81.

2. Pasport natsional’nogo proekta “Demografiya” (utv. prezidiumom Soveta pri Prezidente RF po strategicheskomu razvitiyu i natsional’nym proektam, protokol ot 24 dekabrya 2018 g. N 16) [Passport of the National Project “Demography” (Approved by the Presidium of the Council under the President of the Russian Federation for Strategic Development and National Projects, Protocol of December 24, 2018 No. 16)], available at: http://static.government.ru/media/ files/Z4OMjDgCaeohKWaA0psu6lCekd3hwx2m.pdf

3. Demografiya [Demography]. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki, available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/12781

4. Federal’nyy zakon ot 19 maya 1995 g. N 81-FZ “O gosudarstvennykh posobiyakh grazhdanam, imeyushchim detey” (v red. Federal’nykh zakonov ot 24 noyabrya 1995 g. N 184-FZ, ot 18 iyunya 1996 g. N 76-FZ, ot 24 noyabrya 1996 g. N 130-FZ, ot 30 dekabrya 1996 g. N 162-FZ, ot 21 iyulya 1998 g. N 117-FZ, ot 29 iyulya 1998 g. N 134-FZ, ot 17 iyulya 1999 g. N 171-FZ, ot 10 iyulya 2000 g. N 93-FZ, ot 7 avgusta 2000 g. N 122-FZ, ot 30 maya 2001 g. N 66-FZ, ot 30 maya 2001 g. N 67-FZ, ot 28 dekabrya 2001 g. N 181-FZ, ot 25 iyulya 2002 g. N 116-FZ, ot 22 avgusta 2004 g. N 122-FZ, ot 29 dekabrya 2004 g. N 206-FZ) [Federal Law of May 19, 1995 No. 81-FZ «On State Benefits to Citizens with Children» (as amended by Federal Laws of November 24, 1995 No. 184-FZ, June 18, 1996 No. 76-FZ, November 24, 1996 No. 130-FZ, December 30, 1996 No. 162-FZ, July 21, 1998 No. 117-FZ, July 29, 1998 No. 134-FZ, July 17, 1999 No. 171-FZ, July 10, 2000 No. 93-FZ, August 7, 2000 No. 122-FZ of May 30, 2001 No. 66-FZ of May 30, 2001 No. 67-FZ of December 28, 2001 No. 181-FZ of July 25, 2002 No. 116- FZ of August 22, 2004 No. 122-FZ of December 29, 2004 No. 206-FZ)]. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Ministerstva truda i sotsial’noy zashchity RF, available at: https://mintrud. gov.ru/docs/laws/77

On the Way to the Harmosphere

DOI: 10.33917/es-4.196.2024.108-113

The article dwells on the concept of harmosphere — the sphere of harmony of mind and feeling, man and nature, natural and human sciences. The noosphere arose with the beginning of the “industrial revolution”, when the progress of mankind as a whole came to be determined by reason. According to V.I. Vernadsky, man becomes “the largest geological force.” Modernity corresponds to the end of the noospheric stage of development and the beginning of the harmosphere formation. The “end” of the noosphere correlates with the emergence and legalization of nuclear missile weapons capable of destroying civilization.

References:

1. Golubev V.S. Osnovy garmonologii [Basics of Harmonology]. Moscow, Lenand, 2018.

2. Golubev V.S. Priroda — chelovek — obshchestvo: razvitie i garmoniya [Nature — Man — Society: Development and Harmony]. Moscow, Lenand, 2016.

3. Golubev V.S. Garmoniya spaset mir [Harmony will Save the World]. Moscow, Lenand, 2017.

4. Golubev V.S. Ocherki ekosotsiogumanizma [Essays on Ecosociohumanism]. Moscow, Lenand, 2021.

5. Panov A.D. Singulyarnaya tochka istorii [Singular Point of History] Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2015, no 1.

Anthropic Control of Causal Processes to “Requantize Reality”

DOI: 10.33917/es-4.196.2024.98-107

The role of a man in the universal evolutionary process is underestimated. With the advent of a man, the Multiverse begins to realize itself, cognize and transform itself. Creation of a socially significant reality throughout history is manifested by the anthropic principle, which makes the quantum properties of objects dependent on a person endowed with intelligence.

In the universal evolution formation of mass-kinetic structures and processes has completed and the “requantization of reality” is taking place — transition to information-semantic forms of being and consciousness. A social state, capable of concentrating the necessary resources for a quantum leap into the future, can become an instrument of planned transition. To interact with the Multiverse, it is necessary to apply closing technologies both in technical and humanitarian fields of knowledge.

References:

1. Panov A.D. Universal’naya evolyutsiya i problema poiska vnezemnogo razuma (SETI) [Artificial Intelligence in HR: Four Pros and Four Cons]. Moscow, Izd-vo LKI, 2008. 208 p. (Sinergetika v gumanitarnykh naukakh.)

2. Sudakov K.V. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works]. Moscow, GU NII normal’noy fiziologii im. P.K. Anokhina RAMN, 2007, vol. 1 Razvitie teorii funktsional’nykh sistem. Moscow, 2007, pp. 174–218, 311–337.

3. Sudakov K.V., Kuzichev I.A., Nikolaev A.B. Shchelkanov V.I. Evolyutsiya terminologii i skhem funktsional’nykh sistem v nauchnoy shkole P.K. Anokhina [The Evolution of Terminology and Diagrams of Functional Systems in the Scientific School of P.K. Anokhina]. Moscow, 2010, pp. 80.

4. Sudakov K.V. Informatsionnyy emotsional’nyy rezonans [Informational Emotional Resonance]. Moscow, RITs MGGU im. M.A. Sholokhova, 2008, p. 38.

5. Anokhin P.K. Biologiya i neyrofiziologiya uslovnogo refleksa [Biology and Neurophysiology of the Conditioned Reflex]. Moscow, Meditsina, 1968.

6. Sukharev A.V. Opyt paradigmal’nogo obobshcheniya filosofsko-religioznykh i misticheskikh osnovaniy gumanitarnogo i estestvenno-nauchnogo podkhodov v psikhologicheskoy nauke [Experience of Paradigmatic Generalization of Philosophical, Religious and Mystical Foundations of Humanitarian and Natural Science Approaches in Psychological Science]. Uchenye zapiski Instituta psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2022, vol. 2, no 4, pp. 4–17.

7. Istoriya Temnogo mira [History of the Dark World]. Avt.-sost. A. Lindin. Rostov n/D, Feniks, Saint Petersburg, Izd-vo “Severo-Zapad”, 2007, 832 p.

8. Belavin V.A, Kurdyumov S.P. Rezhimy s obostreniem i zakony koevolyutsii slozhnykh sistem [Aggravation Regimes and Laws of Coevolution of Complex Systems]. Sayt S.P. Kurdyumova “Sinergetika”, available at: http:// spkurdyumov.ru/evolutionism/zakony-koevolyucii-slozhnyxsistem/

9. Kara-Murza S.G., Piskunov D.I. Nauka i ideologiya [Science and Ideology]. Moscow, Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1991.

10. Pereslegin S.B., Korolev A.A., Shilov S.Yu. Kognitivnye predely nauchnogo myshleniya [Cognitive Limits of Scientific Thinking]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2019, no 2, pp. 44–55.

Methodology for Compatibility of the State and Development of Society Paradigms

DOI: 10.33917/es-2.194.2024.108-115

The purpose of the study is to develop the bases of a methodology for compatibility of paradigms of society and its subsystems based on the compatibility of human needs and social values. The growing paradigmatic field of society is examined. The author studies expanded composition of the society subsystems based on the spheres of its life activity. He also defines and presents the compatibility of the society subsystems and the subsystems of an organization as a “unit” of society. A list of the main paradigms in the hierarchy of society subsystems is compiled. The role and significance of the methodology fundamentals for compatibility of the society paradigms are substantiated.

References:

1. Spenser G. Sotsial’naya statika [Social Statics]. Moscow, Yurayt, 2023, 424 p.

2. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Vol. 2. Samosoznanie evropeyskoy kul’tury XX veka [The Decline of Europe. Vol. 2. Self-awareness of the European Culture of the Twentieth Century]. Moscow, IPL, 1991.

3. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow, AST, 2020, 320 p.

4. Toynbi A. Issledovanie istorii. Vozniknovenie, rost i raspad tsivilizatsiy [A Study of History. The Emergence, Growth and Disintegration of Civilizations]. Moscow, AST: AST MOSKVA, 2009.

5. Bondarenko O.Ya. Sbornik dokladov po teorii i filosofii edinogo polya (Podgot. na osnove serii knig “Filosofiya Edinstva”) [Collection of Reports on the Theory and Philosophy of the Unified Field. (Podgot. based on the Book Series “Philosophy of Unit y”)]. Bishkek, 2000.

6. Deyl S. Tonkoe telo. Polnaya entsiklopediya bioenergeticheskoy meditsiny [The Thin Body. The Complete Encyclopedia of Bioenergetic Medicine]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2013.

7. Maslou A. Motivatsiya i lichnost’ [Motivation and Personalit y]. 3rd ed. Moscow, Piter, 2013, 351 p.

8. Berezina T.N. Rezervnye vozmozhnosti cheloveka [Human Reserve Capabilitie]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 2000.

9. Morozov V.A. Sovmestimost’ sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem. Osnovy teorii sovmestimosti [Compatibility of Socio-economic Systems. Fundamentals of the Theory of Compatibility]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 2013.

10. Panov P.V. Instituty, identichnosti, praktiki: teoreticheskaya model’ politicheskogo poryadka [Institutions, Identities, Practices: a Theoretical Model of the Political Order]. Moscow, Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2011, 230 p.

11. Kleyner G.B. Strategiya predpriyatiya [Enterprise Strategy]. Moscow, Delo, 2008.

12. Morozov V.A. Obshchestvo i ekonomika vzaimodeystviya [Society and Economics of Interaction]. Monografiya. Vol. 2. Moscow, Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2017.

13. Morozov V.A. Dukhovnaya ekonomika i sovmestimost’ obshchestva. Teoriya sovmestimosti [Spiritual Economy and Compatibility of Society. Compatibility Theory]. Moscow, Izdatel’sko-torgovaya korporatsiya “Dashkov i K°”, 2021, DOI: 10.29030/978-5-394-04571-4-2021-5-577.

14. Chalmers D. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. N.Y., Oxford Universit y Press, 1996.

Global Reset of Russia’s Sociocultural Trend: from “Classical” to “New” Eurasianism. Part II

DOI: 10.33917/es-2.194.2024.96-107

The article identifies dynamics of the Eurasian concept, which is considered as the basic strategy for the positive development of Russia’s foreseeable future. The author shows that over the last century the national Eurasian model has been transformed in the process of actual socio-economic and political-ideological attitudes. Within classical eurasianism Russia is viewed as a special geographical and socio-cultural civilization that combines Western (Western European) and Eastern (Asian) stereotypes.

It is proved that in the process of the USSR development and formation of the “new” Russia, the theory of eurasianism with a Western European trend was being implemented. Since the second decade of the 21st century, in order to overcome the consequences of anti-Russian sanctions, the Russian Federation has been stimulating a national strategy of Eurasianism with an Eastern (Asian) orientation. However, by the middle of the 21st century in implementing the conceptual model of Eurasianism Russia will return, as suggested in the article, to a classical strategy based on a balance of Westernization and Orientalist ideas.

References:

10. Gumilev L.N. Zametki poslednego evraziytsa [Notes from the Last Eurasian]. Nashe nasledie,1991, no 3, pp. 19–26.

11. Gumilev L.N. “Menya nazyvayut evraziytsem…” [“They Call me a Eurasian…”]. Nash sovremennik, 1991, no 1, pp. 62–70.

12. Likhachev D.S. O natsional’nom kharaktere russkikh [On the National Character of Russians]. Voprosy filosofii, 1990, no 4, pp. 3–6.

13. Polynov M.F. Gonka vooruzheniy kak metod izmatyvaniya SSSR SShA. 1945–1990 gg. [The Arms Race as a Method of Exhausting the USSR and the USA. 1945–1990]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2005, Seriya 2, no 3, pp. 92–103.

14. L’vov D.S. Ekonomika razvitiya [Economics of Development]. Moscow, Ekzamen, 2002.

15. Prokhanov A.A., Glaz’ev S.Yu. Kholodnaya voyna 2.0. Strategiya russkoy pobedy [Cold War 2.0. Russian victory strategy]. Moscow, Knizhnyy mir, 2015, 384 p.

16. Maslov A. Kitayskiy vektor Rossii [Chinese Vector of Russia]. Kommersant”, 2022, 4 fevralya, no 20.

17. Dugin A. My voyuem s tsivilizatsiey Antikhrista [We are at War with the Civilization of the Antichrist]. Izborskiy klub, 2022, 4 maya.

18. Gumilev L.N. Skazhu Vam po sekretu, chto, esli Rossiya budet spasena, tol’ko cherez evraziystvo [I’ll tell you a Secret that if Russia is Saved, it will only be Through Eurasianism]. Sotsium,1992, no 9, p. 89.

Attractor of Stable States of a Social Body: Mathematical Modeling of a Stable State of Control and Options for Loss of Controllability

DOI: 10.33917/es-2.194.2024.88-95

Numerous works on mathematical modeling of the society structure, group formation and dissemination of information do not provide a single consistent model that includes all the empirically discovered properties of society that act as modeling limitations. In this work a mathematical model of stable states of a social body is constructed, it allows us to analyze and predict the controllability of a social body.

References:

1. Aleev R.Z. Higman’s central unit theory, units of integral group rings of finite cyclic groups and Fibonacci numbers. Intern. Journal Algebra and Computations, 1994, vol. 4, pp. 309–358.

2. Bollobas B. Random Graphs. Cambridge Univ. Press, Second Edition, 2001.

3. Bogomolnaia A., Le Breton M., Savvateev A., Weber S. Heterogeneity Gap in Unidimensional Spatial Models. Journal of Public Economic Theory, vol.10, iss. 3, pp. 455–473; CORE Discussion Paper, 2006/36.

4. Bourgain J., Lindenstrauss J. On covering a set in R d by balls of the same diameter. Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis, Lecture Notes in Math., 1469. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991, pp. 138–144.

5. Duncan J. Watts Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. Norton, 2003.

6. Milgram S. The Small World Problem. Psychology Today, 1967.

7. Raigorodskii A.M. On a problem in the geometry of numbers. Trudy Instituta matematiki, 2007, no 15(1), pp. 111–117.

8. Garin E.V., Meshcheryakov R.V. Model’ upravleniya sotsiumom [Society Control Model]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, 2017, no 1, available at: http://uptp.ru/articles/tochka-zreniya/2214/

9. Garin E.V., Meshcheryakov R.V. Method for Determination of the Social Graph Orientation by the Analysis of the Vertices Valence in the Connectivity Component. Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series of “Mathematics. Mechanics. Physics”, 2017, vol. 9, no 4, pp. 5–12.

10. Garin E.V. Eksperimental’noe opredelenie znacheniya predela perkolyatsii, pri kotorom prekrashchaetsya rasprostranenie informatsii v sotsiume: Sovremennye tekhnologii v nauke i obrazovanii — STNO-2018: Sb. trudov mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-tekhnicheskogo foruma [Experimental Determining the Value of the Percolation Limit at which the Information Dissemination in Society Stops: Modern Technologies in Science and Education — STNO-2018:

Collection of Proceedings of the International Scientific and Technical Forum]. Vol. 5. Ryazan’, Ryazanskiy gosudarstvennyy radiotekhnicheskiy university, 2018, 234 p.

11. Garin E.V. Modelэ stroeniya sotsiuma s obratnoy svyaz’yu: Mir Vostoka i Mir Zapada: Sb. statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. 25 aprelya 2018 g. [Model of the Society Architecture with Feedback: The World of the East and the World of the West: Collection of articles of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. April 25, 2018]. Ufa, Izd-vo UGNTU, 2018, 584 p.

12. Garin E.V. Perkolyatsionnaya model’ kommunikatsii s mekhanizmom izbiratel’nogo vospriyatiya informatsii (ob”yasnenie fenomena reklamnoy glukhoty) [Percolation Model of Communication with the Mechanism of Selective Information Perception (Explanation of the Advertising Deafness Phenomenon)]. Kommunikatsii. Media. Dizayn, 2021, vol. 6, no 1, pp. 39–63.

The Problem of Marriage Stability in Modern Russia: Theological and Sociological Analysis

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.100-107

The article examines the problem of sustainability of marriage unions in modern Russia. The author reviews the opinions of Orthodox theologians and sociologists on the causes of this phenomenon and identifies two main concepts: the crisis concept and the progressive one. It is argued that the common underlying cause of family destabilization is weakening of faith in the Triune God, manifested in selfishness, fornication, distorted ideas about gender equality, disorderly parental intervention and excessive concern with economic issues. As a conclusion, it is proposed to further develop Orthodoxy’s efforts to affirm the unsurpassed valu of marriage according to “once for a lifetime” formula and to reveal its deep relationship with the teaching of the Church.

References:

1. Aleksandra Romanova, strtp. Darite lyubov’ (Dnevnikovye zapisi) [Give Love (Diary Entries)]. Moscow, 2010, pp. 26, 27.

2. Preobrazhenskiy I.V. Otechestvennaya Tserkov’ po statisticheskim dannym s 1840–1841 po 1890–1891 gg. [The Russian Church According to Statistical Data from 1840–1841 to 1890–1891]. Saint Petersburg, 1901, pp. 65, 71.

3. Engel’s F. Proiskhozhdenie sem’i, chastnoy sobstvennosti i gosudarstva: Marks K., Engel’s F. Sochineniya [The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State: K. Marx, F. Engels. Works]. Vol. 21, Moscow, 1961, pp. 85, 118.

4. Materialy po statistike Leningrada i Leningradskoy gubernii [Materials on the Statistics of Leningrad and the Leningrad Province]. Vyp. 6, Leningrad, 1925, p. 202.

5. Dinamika naseleniya SSSR 1960–1980 gg. [Dynamics of the USSR Population 1960–1980]. Moscow, 1985, p. 44.

6. Chislo brakov i razvodov za god [Number of Marriages and Divorces per Year]. Rosstat. URL: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/31566; https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/31604

7. Razvody: “uvazhitel’nye” i “neuvazhitel’nye” prichiny [Divorces: “Valid” and “Non-valid” Reasons]. Fond “Obshchestvennoe mnenie”, 2022, 14 iyulya, available at: https://fom.ru/Rabota-i-dom/14750

8. Rossiya i strany mira. 2016 [Russia and Countries of the World. 2016]. Stat. sb. Moscow, 2016, pp. 49–52.

9. Otnoshenie rossiyan k razvodam [Russians’ Attitude Towards Divorce]. VTsIOM, 2021, 11 avgusta, available at: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/ot-braka-do-razvoda-1990-2021

10. Ioann Zlatoust, svyatitel’. 9-ya beseda na 1-e poslanie k Timofeyu: Izbrannye tvoreniya: Sobranie poucheniy [9th Discourse on the First Epistle to Timothy:

Selected Creations. Collection of Teachings]. Vol. 1, Moscow, 1993. S. 352.

11. Georgiy (Shestun), igum. (vposl. — arkhimandrit). Pravoslavnaya sem’ya. Voprosy i otvety [Orthodox Family. Questions and Answers]. Azbuka, available at: https://azbyka.ru/deti/pravoslavnaya-sem-ya-voprosy-i-otvety-igumen-georgij-shestun

12. Osnovy sotsial’noy kontseptsii Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi [Basics of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church]. M., 2019.

Human Self-Sufficiency as the Basis for Self-Sufficiency of Socio-Economic Systems and a Multipolar World

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.93-99

The article dwells on relationship between the self-sufficiency of citizens and the self-sufficiency of socio-economic systems (hereinafter referred to as SES) at any level – from a company to a municipality, region and the state. It is shown that equal, self-sufficient states constitute the basis of a multipolar world. On the example of different countries, in particular the USA, it is shown that lack of self-sufficiency of citizens causes large external debt, the risk of reducing self-sufficiency of the state and, as a consequence, its destruction. Through the prism of self-sufficiency of citizens, the author shows the logical result to which Russian Federation is moving and to which it will arrive if it doesn’t change its monetary policy.

Based on her work experience as an expert, the author focuses on consciousness as an economic-cybernetic category and selfsufficiency as a reproductive (economic) function built into human nature to realize human potential.

References:

1. Bychkova N.Yu. Soznanie kak ekonomicheskaya kategoriya [Consciousness as an Economic Category]. Innovatsii i investitsii, 2022, no 12, pp. 22–29, DOI: 10.24412/2307-180X-2022-12-22-29

2. Ageev A.I., Batchikov S.A., Mityaev D.A. V poiskakh koda Pobedy. Za flazhki proval’nogo meynstrima [Searching for the Victory Code. Beyond the check marks of the failed mainstream]. Izborskiy klub, 2021, 17 noyabrya, available at: https://izborsk-club.ru/21924

3. Bychkova N.Yu. Evolyutsiya pravosoznaniya cheloveka. Smena paradigmy [Evolution of Human Legal Awareness. Paradigm Shift]. Ekonomika i parvo, 2022, no 6, pp. 78–85, DOI 10.37882/2223–2974.2022.06.04

4. Veduta N.I. Ekonomicheskaya kibernetika. Ocherki po voprosam teorii [Economic Cybernetics. Essays on Theory]. Minsk, Nauka i tekhnika, 1971, 322 p.

5. Glaz’ev S.Yu. Za gorizontom kontsa istorii [Beyond the End of History Horizon]. Moscow, Prospekt, 2021, 416 p.

6. Marks K., Engel’s F. Sochineniya [Selected Works]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1961, 858 p.

7. Bychkova N.Yu. Prikladnye aspekty upravleniya zakrytoy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoy sistemoy na primere Kuby [Applied Aspects of Managing a Closed Socio-Economic System on the Example of Cuba]. Ekonomika ustoychivogo razvitiya, 2023, no 2(54), pp. 111–115.

8. Birzhevoy portal [Website], available at: https://take-profit.org/statistics/government-debt-to-gdp/

9. RIA Novosti [Website], available at: https://ria.ru/amp/20230329/dokhody-1861560152.html

10. Birzhevoy portal [Website], available at: https://take-profit.org/statistics/disposable-personal-income/united-states/

11. Veduta E.N. Mezhotraslevoy-mezhsektornyy balans: mekhanizm strategicheskogo planirovaniya ekonomiki [Interindustry-intersectoral Balance: Mechanism for Strategic Planning of the Economy]. Ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov. 2-e izd. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt. 2020, 239 p.

12. Zhukov N.I. Filosofskie osnovy kibernetiki [Philosophical Basics of Cybernetics]. Minsk, Izd-vo BGU, 1976, 224 p.

Global Reset of Russia’s Sociocultural Trend: from “Classical” to “New” Eurasianism

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.86-89

The article identifies dynamics of the Eurasian concept, which is considered as the basic strategy for the positive development of Russia’s foreseeable future. The author shows that over the last century the national Eurasian model has been transformed in the process of actual socio-economic and political-ideological attitudes. Within classical eurasianism Russia is viewed as a special geographical and socio-cultural civilization that combines Western (Western European) and Eastern (Asian) stereotypes.

It is proved that in the process of the USSR development and formation of the “new” Russia, the theory of eurasianism with a Western European trend was being implemented. Since the second decade of the 21st century, in order to overcome the consequences of anti-Russian sanctions, the Russian Federation has been stimulating a national strategy of Eurasianism with an Eastern (Asian) orientation. However, by the middle of the 21st century in implementing the conceptual model of Eurasianism Russia will return, as suggested in the article, to a classical strategy based on a balance of Westernization and Orientalist ideas.

References:

1. Blekher L.I., Lyubarskiy G.Yu. Glavnyy russkiy spor: ot zapadnikov i slavyanofilov do globalizma i Novogo Srednevekov’ya [The Main Russian Dispute: from Westerners and Slavophiles to Globalism and the New Middle Ages]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt, 2003, 608 p.

2. Chumakov A.N. “Filosofskiy parokhod”. 100 let bez pokayaniya [“The Philosophical Ship”. 100 years without Repentance]. Monografiya. Moscow, Prospekt, 2022, 456 p.

3. Zalozhnykh Yu.S. Slavyanofily i neoslavyanofily: problema soderzhaniya kategoriy v dukhovnoy praktike rossiyskogo obshchestva [Slavophiles and Slavophiles: the Problem of the Content of Categories in the Spiritual Practice of Russian Society]. Filosofiya i kul’tura, 2013, no 9, pp. 1212–1216.

4. Berdyaev N.A. Evraziytsy. Russkoe natsional’noe samosoznanie i “evraziystvo” [Eurasians. Russian National Identity and “Eurasianism”]. Moscow, T8, 2018.

5. Iskhod k Vostoku. Predchuvstviya i sversheniya [Exodus to the East. Premonitions and Accomplishments]. Pod red. P.N. Savitskogo, P.P. Suvchinskogo, N.S. Trubetskogo, G.V. Florovskogo. Sofiya, 1921.

6. Osnovy evraziystva [Foundations of Eurasianism]. Moscow, Arktogeya Tsentr, 2002, 800 p.

7. Lyuks L. Zametki o “revolyutsionno-traditsionalistskoy” kul’turnoy modeli “evraziytsev” [Notes on the “Revolutionary-Traditionalist” Cultural Model of the “Eurasians”]. Voprosy filosofii, 2003, no 7, pp. 23–34.

8. Shpotov B.M. Zapadnye istochniki industrializatsii SSSR (konets 1920-kh — 1930-e gody) [Western Sources of Industrialization of the USSR (late 1920s —1930s)]. Moscow, Institut vseobshchey istorii RAN.

9. Sipols V.Ya. Torgovo-ekonomicheskie otnosheniya mezhdu SSSR i Germaniey v 1939–1941 gg. v svete novykh arkhivnykh dokumentov [Trade and Economic Relations between the USSR and Germany in 1939–1941. in the Light of New Archival Documents]. Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya, 1997, no 2, pp. 29–41.