DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.70-75

The article dwells on the changes in the Market Index of “Economic Strategies” (MIES) for eleven months of 2023.

Contribution of demand and supply indicators to MIES is assessed. Analysis of industrial production is carried out.

References:

1. Itogi goda s Vladimirom Putinym: pryamaya liniya s grazhdanami i bol’shaya press-konferentsiya s predstavitelyami SMI 14 dekabrya 2023 goda [Results of the Year with Vladimir Putin: Direct Line with Citizens and a Large Press Conference with Media Representatives on December 14, 2023]. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Prezidenta RF, available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/7299

2. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe polozhenie Rossii v yanvare — noyabre 2023 goda: Doklad [Socio-economic Situation in Russia in January — November 2023: Report]. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki, available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/osn-11-2023.pdf

3. Frenkel’ A.A., Tikhomirov B.I., Surkov A.A. Itogi strategicheskogo razvitiya Rossii v yanvare — aprele 2023 goda — luchshe pessimistichnykh prognozov [Outcomes of Russia’s Strategic Development in January-April 2023 are Better than Pessimistic Forecasts]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2023, no 4, pp. 86–91, DOI: 10.33917/es-4.190.2023.86-91

4. Obrashchenie Prezidenta RF V.V. Putina v svyazi s predsedatel’stvom RF v Ob”edinenii BRIKS [Address by the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin in Connection with the Russian Federation’s Chairmanship of the BRICS Association]. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Prezidenta RF, available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/73202

5. Kontseptsiya predsedatel’stva RF v Sodruzhestve Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv v 2024 godu [Concept of the Russian Federation’s Chairmanship of the Commonwealth of Independent States in 2024]. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Prezidenta RF, available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/73203

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.76-81

References:

1. Koshkin V.I., Kretov S.I. Osnovy politicheskoy ekonomii solidarizma [Foundations of the Political Economy of Solidarism]. Moscow, LENAND 2017.

2. Belyaev S., Koshkin V. Mozhet li ekonomika byt’ solidarnoy? Chast’ 1 [Can the Economy be Solidary? Part 1]. Ekspert, 2020, no 14, pp. 66–71.

3. Belyaev S. Retsept ot bednosti: vvesti sobstvennost’ rossiyan na vse prirodnye resursy. Kak preodolet’ vopiyushchee neravenstvo [The Recipe for Poverty: Introduce Russian Ownership of all Natural Resources. How to Overcome Gross Inequality]. Moskovskiy komsomolets, 2021, 20 maya, available at: https://www.mk.ru/economics/2021/05/20/recept-ot-bednosti-vvesti-sobstvennost-rossiyan-na-vse-prirodnye-resursy.html

4. Koshkin V.I., Kretov S.I. Solidarnaya ekonomika: Put’ v budushchee [Solidarity Economy: The Way to the Future]. Moscow, LENAND, 2018.

5. Belyaev S., Koshkin V. Mozhet li ekonomika byt’ solidarnoy? Chast’ 2 [Can the Economy be Solidary? Part 2]. Ekspert, 2020, no 15–16, pp. 38–43.

6. Belloc H. Essays of a Catholic. N.Y. Books for Librarian Press, 1967.

7. Chesterton G.K. The Outline of Sanity. Leipzig, Bernard Tauchnitz, 1927.

8. Duboin J. La Grande Relève des Hommes par la Machine. Paris, Editions nouvelles,1932.

9. Bellami E. Cherez sto let: Sobr. soch.: V°2 t. [After a hundred years: Collected Works: In 2 vol.]. Vol. 1. Moscow, Knizhnyy mir, Knigovek, 2018.

10. Laudrain M. La vie Française du socialisme. Paris, La Maison du Livre Français, 1963.

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.82-83

References:

1. Koshkin V.I., Kretov S.I. Osnovy politicheskoy ekonomii solidarizma [Foundations of the Political Economy of Solidarism]. Moscow, LENAND 2017.

2. Belyaev S., Koshkin V. Mozhet li ekonomika byt’ solidarnoy? Chast’ 1 [Can the Economy be Solidary? Part 1]. Ekspert, 2020, no 14, pp. 66–71.

3. Belyaev S. Retsept ot bednosti: vvesti sobstvennost’ rossiyan na vse prirodnye resursy. Kak preodolet’ vopiyushchee neravenstvo [The Recipe for Poverty: Introduce Russian Ownership of all Natural Resources. How to Overcome Gross Inequality]. Moskovskiy komsomolets, 2021, 20 maya, available at: https://www.mk.ru/economics/2021/05/20/recept-ot-bednosti-vvesti-sobstvennost-rossiyan-na-vse-prirodnye-resursy.html

4. Koshkin V.I., Kretov S.I. Solidarnaya ekonomika: Put’ v budushchee [Solidarity Economy: The Way to the Future]. Moscow, LENAND, 2018.

5. Belyaev S., Koshkin V. Mozhet li ekonomika byt’ solidarnoy? Chast’ 2 [Can the Economy be Solidary? Part 2]. Ekspert, 2020, no 15–16, pp. 38–43.

6. Belloc H. Essays of a Catholic. N.Y. Books for Librarian Press, 1967.

7. Chesterton G.K. The Outline of Sanity. Leipzig, Bernard Tauchnitz, 1927.

8. Duboin J. La Grande Relève des Hommes par la Machine. Paris, Editions nouvelles,1932.

9. Bellami E. Cherez sto let: Sobr. soch.: V°2 t. [After a hundred years: Collected Works: In 2 vol.]. Vol. 1. Moscow, Knizhnyy mir, Knigovek, 2018.

10. Laudrain M. La vie Française du socialisme. Paris, La Maison du Livre Français, 1963.

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.84-85

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.86-89

The article identifies dynamics of the Eurasian concept, which is considered as the basic strategy for the positive development of Russia’s foreseeable future. The author shows that over the last century the national Eurasian model has been transformed in the process of actual socio-economic and political-ideological attitudes. Within classical eurasianism Russia is viewed as a special geographical and socio-cultural civilization that combines Western (Western European) and Eastern (Asian) stereotypes.

It is proved that in the process of the USSR development and formation of the “new” Russia, the theory of eurasianism with a Western European trend was being implemented. Since the second decade of the 21st century, in order to overcome the consequences of anti-Russian sanctions, the Russian Federation has been stimulating a national strategy of Eurasianism with an Eastern (Asian) orientation. However, by the middle of the 21st century in implementing the conceptual model of Eurasianism Russia will return, as suggested in the article, to a classical strategy based on a balance of Westernization and Orientalist ideas.

References:

1. Blekher L.I., Lyubarskiy G.Yu. Glavnyy russkiy spor: ot zapadnikov i slavyanofilov do globalizma i Novogo Srednevekov’ya [The Main Russian Dispute: from Westerners and Slavophiles to Globalism and the New Middle Ages]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt, 2003, 608 p.

2. Chumakov A.N. “Filosofskiy parokhod”. 100 let bez pokayaniya [“The Philosophical Ship”. 100 years without Repentance]. Monografiya. Moscow, Prospekt, 2022, 456 p.

3. Zalozhnykh Yu.S. Slavyanofily i neoslavyanofily: problema soderzhaniya kategoriy v dukhovnoy praktike rossiyskogo obshchestva [Slavophiles and Slavophiles: the Problem of the Content of Categories in the Spiritual Practice of Russian Society]. Filosofiya i kul’tura, 2013, no 9, pp. 1212–1216.

4. Berdyaev N.A. Evraziytsy. Russkoe natsional’noe samosoznanie i “evraziystvo” [Eurasians. Russian National Identity and “Eurasianism”]. Moscow, T8, 2018.

5. Iskhod k Vostoku. Predchuvstviya i sversheniya [Exodus to the East. Premonitions and Accomplishments]. Pod red. P.N. Savitskogo, P.P. Suvchinskogo, N.S. Trubetskogo, G.V. Florovskogo. Sofiya, 1921.

6. Osnovy evraziystva [Foundations of Eurasianism]. Moscow, Arktogeya Tsentr, 2002, 800 p.

7. Lyuks L. Zametki o “revolyutsionno-traditsionalistskoy” kul’turnoy modeli “evraziytsev” [Notes on the “Revolutionary-Traditionalist” Cultural Model of the “Eurasians”]. Voprosy filosofii, 2003, no 7, pp. 23–34.

8. Shpotov B.M. Zapadnye istochniki industrializatsii SSSR (konets 1920-kh — 1930-e gody) [Western Sources of Industrialization of the USSR (late 1920s —1930s)]. Moscow, Institut vseobshchey istorii RAN.

9. Sipols V.Ya. Torgovo-ekonomicheskie otnosheniya mezhdu SSSR i Germaniey v 1939–1941 gg. v svete novykh arkhivnykh dokumentov [Trade and Economic Relations between the USSR and Germany in 1939–1941. in the Light of New Archival Documents]. Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya, 1997, no 2, pp. 29–41.

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.93-99

The article dwells on relationship between the self-sufficiency of citizens and the self-sufficiency of socio-economic systems (hereinafter referred to as SES) at any level – from a company to a municipality, region and the state. It is shown that equal, self-sufficient states constitute the basis of a multipolar world. On the example of different countries, in particular the USA, it is shown that lack of self-sufficiency of citizens causes large external debt, the risk of reducing self-sufficiency of the state and, as a consequence, its destruction. Through the prism of self-sufficiency of citizens, the author shows the logical result to which Russian Federation is moving and to which it will arrive if it doesn’t change its monetary policy.

Based on her work experience as an expert, the author focuses on consciousness as an economic-cybernetic category and selfsufficiency as a reproductive (economic) function built into human nature to realize human potential.

References:

1. Bychkova N.Yu. Soznanie kak ekonomicheskaya kategoriya [Consciousness as an Economic Category]. Innovatsii i investitsii, 2022, no 12, pp. 22–29, DOI: 10.24412/2307-180X-2022-12-22-29

2. Ageev A.I., Batchikov S.A., Mityaev D.A. V poiskakh koda Pobedy. Za flazhki proval’nogo meynstrima [Searching for the Victory Code. Beyond the check marks of the failed mainstream]. Izborskiy klub, 2021, 17 noyabrya, available at: https://izborsk-club.ru/21924

3. Bychkova N.Yu. Evolyutsiya pravosoznaniya cheloveka. Smena paradigmy [Evolution of Human Legal Awareness. Paradigm Shift]. Ekonomika i parvo, 2022, no 6, pp. 78–85, DOI 10.37882/2223–2974.2022.06.04

4. Veduta N.I. Ekonomicheskaya kibernetika. Ocherki po voprosam teorii [Economic Cybernetics. Essays on Theory]. Minsk, Nauka i tekhnika, 1971, 322 p.

5. Glaz’ev S.Yu. Za gorizontom kontsa istorii [Beyond the End of History Horizon]. Moscow, Prospekt, 2021, 416 p.

6. Marks K., Engel’s F. Sochineniya [Selected Works]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1961, 858 p.

7. Bychkova N.Yu. Prikladnye aspekty upravleniya zakrytoy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoy sistemoy na primere Kuby [Applied Aspects of Managing a Closed Socio-Economic System on the Example of Cuba]. Ekonomika ustoychivogo razvitiya, 2023, no 2(54), pp. 111–115.

8. Birzhevoy portal [Website], available at: https://take-profit.org/statistics/government-debt-to-gdp/

9. RIA Novosti [Website], available at: https://ria.ru/amp/20230329/dokhody-1861560152.html

10. Birzhevoy portal [Website], available at: https://take-profit.org/statistics/disposable-personal-income/united-states/

11. Veduta E.N. Mezhotraslevoy-mezhsektornyy balans: mekhanizm strategicheskogo planirovaniya ekonomiki [Interindustry-intersectoral Balance: Mechanism for Strategic Planning of the Economy]. Ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov. 2-e izd. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt. 2020, 239 p.

12. Zhukov N.I. Filosofskie osnovy kibernetiki [Philosophical Basics of Cybernetics]. Minsk, Izd-vo BGU, 1976, 224 p.

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.5

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.100-107

The article examines the problem of sustainability of marriage unions in modern Russia. The author reviews the opinions of Orthodox theologians and sociologists on the causes of this phenomenon and identifies two main concepts: the crisis concept and the progressive one. It is argued that the common underlying cause of family destabilization is weakening of faith in the Triune God, manifested in selfishness, fornication, distorted ideas about gender equality, disorderly parental intervention and excessive concern with economic issues. As a conclusion, it is proposed to further develop Orthodoxy’s efforts to affirm the unsurpassed valu of marriage according to “once for a lifetime” formula and to reveal its deep relationship with the teaching of the Church.

References:

1. Aleksandra Romanova, strtp. Darite lyubov’ (Dnevnikovye zapisi) [Give Love (Diary Entries)]. Moscow, 2010, pp. 26, 27.

2. Preobrazhenskiy I.V. Otechestvennaya Tserkov’ po statisticheskim dannym s 1840–1841 po 1890–1891 gg. [The Russian Church According to Statistical Data from 1840–1841 to 1890–1891]. Saint Petersburg, 1901, pp. 65, 71.

3. Engel’s F. Proiskhozhdenie sem’i, chastnoy sobstvennosti i gosudarstva: Marks K., Engel’s F. Sochineniya [The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State: K. Marx, F. Engels. Works]. Vol. 21, Moscow, 1961, pp. 85, 118.

4. Materialy po statistike Leningrada i Leningradskoy gubernii [Materials on the Statistics of Leningrad and the Leningrad Province]. Vyp. 6, Leningrad, 1925, p. 202.

5. Dinamika naseleniya SSSR 1960–1980 gg. [Dynamics of the USSR Population 1960–1980]. Moscow, 1985, p. 44.

6. Chislo brakov i razvodov za god [Number of Marriages and Divorces per Year]. Rosstat. URL: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/31566; https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/31604

7. Razvody: “uvazhitel’nye” i “neuvazhitel’nye” prichiny [Divorces: “Valid” and “Non-valid” Reasons]. Fond “Obshchestvennoe mnenie”, 2022, 14 iyulya, available at: https://fom.ru/Rabota-i-dom/14750

8. Rossiya i strany mira. 2016 [Russia and Countries of the World. 2016]. Stat. sb. Moscow, 2016, pp. 49–52.

9. Otnoshenie rossiyan k razvodam [Russians’ Attitude Towards Divorce]. VTsIOM, 2021, 11 avgusta, available at: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/ot-braka-do-razvoda-1990-2021

10. Ioann Zlatoust, svyatitel’. 9-ya beseda na 1-e poslanie k Timofeyu: Izbrannye tvoreniya: Sobranie poucheniy [9th Discourse on the First Epistle to Timothy:

Selected Creations. Collection of Teachings]. Vol. 1, Moscow, 1993. S. 352.

11. Georgiy (Shestun), igum. (vposl. — arkhimandrit). Pravoslavnaya sem’ya. Voprosy i otvety [Orthodox Family. Questions and Answers]. Azbuka, available at: https://azbyka.ru/deti/pravoslavnaya-sem-ya-voprosy-i-otvety-igumen-georgij-shestun

12. Osnovy sotsial’noy kontseptsii Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi [Basics of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox Church]. M., 2019.