DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.127.2025.30-43

In the context of the growing importance of sustainable development and increasing societal expectations toward business, Russian companies face the need to integrate corporate social responsibility into management processes based on the traditional values of national culture. This article presents theoretical and methodological approaches to developing a value-based model for managing organizational sustainable development. Key elements of the model, including principles of fairness, dignity, and solidarity, are explored, as well as their role in enhancing organizational resilience and adaptability. A conceptual foundation has been formed for the subsequent development of a functional model and tools for its implementation.

References:

1. Declaration of Principles of Russian Corporate Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility: Dignity. Trust. Action. Moscow: Coalition of Creators, 2023. 28 p. URL: https:///coalition-contributions/

2. Vishnyakova D.A. Traditional Values in the Russian Management System: Development History and Relevance in Modern Conditions. Scientific Notes of Young Researchers. 2023;11(3):65-72. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/traditsionnye-tsennosti-v-rossiyskoy-sisteme-menedzhmenta

3. Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation. Report on the State of Civil Society in the Russian Federation — 2022: Traditional Values. Section 3.1. Moscow: Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation, 2022. URL: https://report2022.oprf.ru/ru-RU/traditional-values.html

4. Agafonova A.N., Yakhneeva I.V., Nikitina I.N. Corporate Social Responsibility in Russia: Motives and Features // In: Mantulenko V. (ed.) Global Challenges and Prospects of the Modern Economic Development. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 57. pp. 1055-1068. 2019. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.105.

5. Cameron K. Responsible Leadership as Virtuous Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics. 2011;98(1):25-35. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-1023-6.

6. Grachev M.V., Bobina M.A. Russian Organizational Leadership: Lessons from the GLOBE Study. International Journal of Leadership Studies. 2006;1(2):98-116.

7. Zavyalova E., Ostrovskaya E. Corporate Social Responsibility in Russia. SHS Web of Conferences. 2020. Vol. 89. Art. 06008. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20208906008.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.127.2026.20-29

The author proceeds from the premise that for developing countries, the highest criterion of state effectiveness is the country’s transition to a new level, joining the ranks of developed countries. Of all the post-socialist bloc countries, Poland and the Czech Republic have achieved this. The author analyzes these cases. Poland implemented a standard set of macroeconomic reforms, and they proved successful thanks to a shift in public thinking: a focus on economic rather than political issues and, as a result, the widespread development of small and medium-sized businesses, which became the driving force of development. The Czech Republic had different starting conditions than Poland. The success of the Czech Republic’s economic breakthrough was determined by the correct actions taken with respect to industrial potential, which was preserved through prudent decisions during privatization and the development of international investment cooperation.

References:

1. Global Governance Indicators. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators/interactive-data-access

2. Kovaleva V., Elistratov A. Historical Review of Economic Transformations in Poland (1990-2020). Journal of Historical Research. 2022;7(1):9-12.

3. Capitalism without Capitalists. Why Poland Was Able to Build Functioning Democratic Institutions. URL: https://lenta.ru/articles/2016/05/19/poland_capitalism/

4. Sinitsina I., Chudakova N. The EU and the Polish Economy: From Adaptation to Integration. Modern Europe. 2006;3:108-123.

5. Gabarta A. Poland: 30 Years of Socioeconomic Transformations and 15 Years of EU Membership. Europe. 2019;7:82-92.

6. Mikhalev O.Yu. Results of the Law and Justice Party’s Stay in Power in Poland. Visegrad Europe. Central European Journal. 2023;4:75-90.

7. European Innovation Scoreboard 2024. Country Data. Poland. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/assets/rtd/eis/2024/

8. Mickiewicz B. Assessment and Directions of Innovative Development of the Polish Economy. Proceedings of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference «Modern Agrarian Economy: Science and Practice». Publisher: Belarusian State Agricultural Academy (Gorki), 2022. pp. 129-133.

9. Large-scale energy project: Poland allocates billions for first nuclear power plant. URL: https://hvylya.net/news/305243-masshtabnyy-energeticheskiy-proekt-polsha-vydelyaet-milliardy-na-pervuyu-aes

10. The Polish government intends to invest 70 billion zlotys in national energy grids. URL: https://www.polskieradio.pl/397/7830/Artykul/

11. Piatkowski Marcin. Poland has become Europe’s growth champion, but can this success continue? URL: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2018/12/17/poland-has-become-europes-growth-champion-but-can-this-success-continue/

12. Alekhnovich A. Lessons from the Privatization of State-Owned Enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe. URL: https://isans.org/ru/articles/uroki-privatizaczii-gospredpriyatij-v-stranah-czve.html

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.127.2026.12-19

The effectiveness of China’s institutional system and policy tools in achieving technological sovereignty (TS) is evident in specific examples. The article analyzes the most significant achievements in the fundamental industries of the new technological order (TO): microelectronics, 5G, quantum computing, artificial intelligence, supercomputers, robotics, and new materials. China has successfully narrowed the gap with global leaders and achieved global leadership in several sectors (5G, robotics), which is crucial for national security and competitiveness.

References:

1. Glazyev S. Yu. The Chinese Economic Miracle. Lessons for Russia and the World. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishing House, 2023. 406 p.

2. Made in China 2025. State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2015. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-05/19/content_9784.htm

3. SMIC. Annual Report 2022. Available at: https://www.sminvestments.com/publication/smic-integrated-annual-corporate-governance-report-for-year-ended-2022/

4. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). Final Rule on Additional Export Controls to the PRC, 2022.

5. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Annual Report 2023.

6. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Index 2023.

7. Who is leading the 5G patent race? IPlytics, 2021. URL: https://www.iam-media.com/article/who-leading-the-5g-patent-race-patent-landscape-analysis-declared-seps-and-standards-contributions

8. China’s quantum processor Zuchongzhi 3.2 achieves global parity. Global Times, 2025. URL: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202512/1351319.shtml

9. Next-generation AI development plan. State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2017. URL: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-07/20/content_5211996.htm

10. TOP500.org. November 2023 TOP500 List, 2023. URL: https://www.top500.org/lists/top500/list/2023/11/

11. China Optoelectronic Display Industry Investment Report 2025. CINNO Research, 2025.

12. China Additive Manufacturing Industry Alliance. 2025 China Additive Manufacturing Industry Development Report, 2026.

13. Made in China 2025. State Council of the PRC, 2025.

14. China Sensor & Internet of Things Industry Alliance. Sensor Industry White Paper 2025.

15. Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025. Stanford University, 2025.

16. TOP500.org. June 2025 TOP500 List, 2025. URL: https://serverflow.ru/blog/stati/top500-iyun-2025-chto-novogo-v-reytinge-luchshikh-superkompyuterov/

17. World Robotics 2022 Report. International Federation of Robotics (IFR), 2022.

18. White Paper on China’s Robotics Industry. China Institute of Electronics, 2023.

19. Research Report on China’s Robotics Industry. Goldman Sachs Asia, 2023.

20. Annual Report 2023. National Silicon Industry Group, 2023.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.127.2026.5-11

The article examines the challenges of maintaining clusters of organizational and economic agents using a digital «twin» of the organizational and economic agent, operating within a distributed network of control centers to ensure the sustainability of digital institutional management structures within the economic supersystem of the Union State of Russia and Belarus.

References:

1. Ageev A.I., Bakhtizin A.R., Makarov V.L., Loginov E.L. [et al.] The economic foundation of victory: a strategic forecast of the stability of the Russian economy in the face of sanctions attacks. Economic strategies. 2023;25(3(189)):6-15.

2. Ageev A.I., Bochkarev O.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Network-centric system of increased survivability of Russian energy management in difficult-to-predict critical conditions. Economic strategies. 2021;23(3(177)):6-17.

3. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L. The world community in conditions of supercritical bifurcation / Management of complex organizational and technical systems in conditions of supercritical situations: Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference, Moscow, April 21-22, 2022. Moscow: Institute of Economic Strategies, 2022. pp. 9-12.

4. Ageev A.I. The role of sanctions, conflicts and special operations: reflections on the future. Part 1. Scientific Bulletin of the Russian Military-industrial complex. 2023;4:66-74.

5. Ageev A.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Russia in a supercritical situation: managing the restoration of life support functions to overcome the consequences of a natural disaster. Economic strategies. 2021;23(5(179)):28-35.

6. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L. Strategic predestination of special military operations in the global supersystem. Economic strategies. 2023;25(4(190)):6-19.

7. Ageev A.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. The use of artificial intelligence in the implementation of military command and control of civilian facilities as a single hybrid battlefield / Neurocomputers and their application: Abstracts of the XX All-Russian Scientific Conference, Moscow, March 22, 2022 Moscow: MGPPU, 2022. pp. 31-33.

8. Glazyev S.Y., Arkhipova V.V. Assessment of the impact of sanctions and other crisis factors on the state of the Russian economy. Russian Economic Journal. 2018;1:3-29.

9. Golublev A.A., Abramov V.I., Loginov E.L., Shkuta A.A., Doholyan A.S., Loginova V.E., Evdokimov D.S. Operation of human behavior in the state and society based on agent-based modeling using neural encoding of cognitive information. Artificial societies. 2019;14(3):1.

10. Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. The use of supercomputer technologies for managing fuel and energy resources transportation systems / Actual problems of scientific knowledge. New technologies of the Fuel and Energy Complex-2024: Proceedings of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference, Tyumen, April 26-27, 2024. Tyumen: Tyumen Industrial University, 2024. pp. 169-172.

11. Loginov E.L. Ensuring the safety and stability of complex organizational systems in conditions of natural and man-made electromagnetic influences. Moscow: Scientific Library Publishing House, 2024. 364 p.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-1.126.2025.27-41

The article analyzes China’s model for achieving technological sovereignty, traces its historical evolution, describes its institutional system, outlines the key state governance tools used in this process, and provides concrete examples of outcomes achieved. Understanding China’s experience in achieving technological sovereignty through instruments and mechanisms of strategic state governance is of great relevance for implementing similar Russian plans and aligning the EAEU with China’s global Belt and Road Initiative. The scientific novelty of the study lies in identifying the institutional mechanism of the guided transition to a new technological paradigm using China as a case study, as well as in systematizing the tools of strategic state governance that enable the reproduction of technological sovereignty. The methodological basis of the study is an institutional evolutionary analysis within the framework of technological paradigm shift theory.

References:

1. Glazyev S.Yu. Managing Economic Development: A Lecture Course. 2019. 759 p.

2. Arrighi G. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. L.: Verso, 1994.

3. Glazyev S.Yu. The Last World War. The USA Starts and Loses. Knizhnny Mir, 2016. (Izborsky Club Collection).

4. Gallagher K.S. The Globalization of Clean Energy Technology: Lessons from China. The MIT Press, 2019.

5. Liu X. Cheng P. National Strategy of Indigenous Innovation and its Implication to China. URL: (PDF) National Strategy of Indigenous Innovation and its Implications to China

6. 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要 URL: https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2006/content_240244.htm

7. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2015, May 19). «Made in China 2025» (《中国制造2025》). Retrieved from the official website of the Central Government of the People’s Republic of China. URL: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-05/19/content_9784.htm

8. 国家集成电路产业投资基金 URL：https://baike.baidu.com/item/国家集成电路产业投资基金/15891498

9. 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要 URL: https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2006/content_240244.htm

10. Physics Today. (n.d.). China’s 15-year science and technology plan. URL: https://physicstoday.aip.org/features/chinas-15-year-science-and-technology-plan

11. U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC). China’s Indigenous Innovation Policy. 2011. URL: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/5.4.11Wolff.pdf

12. Stanford Digital China Lab. (n.d.). Lexicon: Indigenous Innovation or Independent Innovation (自主创新, Zìzhǔ Chuàngxīn). URL: https://digichina.stanford.edu/work/lexicon-indigenous-innovation-or-independent-innovation-zizhu-chuangxin/

13. Li X., Liu Y. China’s innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory. Research Policy. 2011;40(7):917-931. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733311000709

DOI: 10.33917/mic-1.126.2026.12-26

The article examines models, factors, and conditions for Russia’s development of scientific and technical potential, and suggests a number of adjustments to the regulatory system governing scientific and technological advancement in education, research, and industry, which could serve as a basis for a set of actions aimed at enhancing strategic management and securing Russia’s technological independence.

References:

1. Afanasyev A.A. Technological sovereignty as a scientific category within the system of contemporary knowledge. Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2022;12(9):2377-2394.

2. Lenchuk E.B. Scientific and technological development as a strategic national priority of Russia. The economic revival of Russia. 2022;1 (71):58-65.

3. Kalinenko N.L. Import Substitution and Technological Sovereignty. Education and Law. 2023;11:87-91.

4. Yurevich M.A. Technological sovereignty in Russia: Concept, measurement and possibility of achieving it. Questions of Theoretical Economics. 2023;4:7-21.

5. Shkodinsky S.V., Prodchenko I.A., Matyuhin V.N. Contours of modern Russia’s industrial policy to ensure the country’s technological independence. Bulletin of the Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2024;6(1):3-12.

6. Ostapuk S.F., Kupriianova L.P., Fetisova V.P. Organizational and legal solutions to ensure technological sovereignty. Moscow, INFRA-М, 2025. 326 p.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-1.126.2026.5-11

The article examines the problems of configuring long-term demographic trends in the context of geopolitical shocks with a focus on increasing the operational array of human (bio-social) and resource-consumption (material and non-material) factors as elements of a socio-economic supersystem with a significant component of difficult-to-predict development. The paper analyses the problems of maintaining viability of the state as a supersystem. The authors substantiate a direction of the regulatory vector for the developed profiles of operational indicators depending on different population structures as a predictable phenomenon – a baseline from which to build on the factors stimulating demographic basis for the state’s viability. The main objective is to support transition of the human resource provision for the armed forces (in the context of the Special Military Operation) and production structures in various sectors of the economy from a cluster of difficult-to-predict development (instability) into a cluster with confirmed available opportunities for replenishing military personnel and key industries workers (primarily defence and critical infrastructure) as a computation solution in relation to the macro-space of operated indicators.

References:

1. Ageev A.I., Bakhtizin A.R., Makarov V.L., Loginov E.L. [et al.]. The economic foundation of victory: a strategic forecast of the stability of the Russian economy in the face of sanctions attacks. Economic strategies. 2023;25(3(189)):6-15.

2. Ageev A.I., Bochkarev O.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Network-centric system of increased survivability of Russian energy management in difficult-to-predict critical conditions. Economic strategies. 2021;23(3(177)):6-17.

3. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L. The world community in conditions of supercritical bifurcation / Management of complex organizational and technical systems in conditions of supercritical situations: Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference, Moscow, April 21-22, 2022. Moscow: Institute of Economic Strategies, 2022. pp. 9-12.

4. Ageev A.I. The role of sanctions, conflicts and special operations: reflections on the future. Part 1. Scientific Bulletin of the Russian Military-industrial complex. 2023;4:66-74.

5. Ageev A.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Russia in a supercritical situation: managing the restoration of life support functions to overcome the consequences of a natural disaster. Economic strategies. 2021;23(5(179)):28-35.

6. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L. Strategic predestination of special military operations in the global supersystem. Economic strategies. 2023;25(4(190)):6-19.

7. Ageev A.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. The use of artificial intelligence in the implementation of military command and control of civilian facilities as a single hybrid battlefield / Neurocomputers and their application: Abstracts of the XX All-Russian Scientific Conference, Moscow, March 22, 2022. Moscow: MGPPU, 2022. pp. 31-33.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-6.125.2025.21-34

This article examines the relationship between agile technology and the classical management cycle in the methodology of the system-activity approach in modern socio-economic conditions. If you study the description of the Agile methodology in various sources and publications, you can see the general requirements for the organization of work during the project implementation process, but there is a lack of a rigid technological form of management according to this methodology. In the absence of such information, it is difficult to be sure that there are no «gaps», and the probability of defects is high if it is not possible to accurately identify the person responsible for the area where the defect occurred. In order to solve this problem, this article attempts to compare Agile methodology with the classical technological cycle of management activities. The paper shows that project management using the method of correlating Agile project management technology with the technological cycle of management activities will make project management organized, on the one hand, and ensure optimal tracking of «nuances» and «details», using the advantages of classical project management and Agile technology, while maximizing their weaknesses. the parties. Agile does not replace the technological management cycle, but complements it where flexibility is needed.

References:

1. Anisimov O.S. 100 shem. OOO Veliky Novgorod Pechatny Dvor, 2013, 156 p.

2. Anisimov O.S. Managerial decision-making. Meteorology and technology. M.: Rosako APK, 2002. 436 p.i.; 22.

3. Anes V., Abreu A., Diaz A., Kalado J. The Agile team assignment model for agile scaling. Informatics Procedia. 2023;219:1634–1641.

4. Beat K. Flexible by accident: how to apply flexible principles in academic research projects. SN Social Sciences. 2024;4(1):2.

5. Das S., Panda M., Rekha Sahu S., Patnaik D. Flexible change management: adaptation of flexible methodologies to enhance the sustainability of the organization. Journal of Research in the Field of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2023;6:41–52.

6. De Abreu J.N.F., Casagrande D.J. Lean manufacturing: combining a flexible approach with the philosophy of lean manufacturing and organizational efficiency. Revista Sistematica. 2024;14(6):1442–1453.

7. Excel in Chukvura. Flexible privacy in practice: integration of CCPA and GDPR within flexible frameworks in the US technology arena. International Journal of Scientific Research Updates. 2024;7(2):024–036.

8. Findsrud R. Flexible approach to innovation in the service sector: creating valuable innovations in the service sector with flexible integration of resources. The journal of value Creation. 2020;6(2):190–207.

9. Helmlinger P. Flexible transformation: a case study at an early stage of flexible implementation. Our economy. 2023;69(1):56–67.

10. Neuman M., Kuchel T., Ph.D. Diebold, Schenn E.M. Collision with flexible culture: identification of problems in the development of flexible thinking in organizations. Computer Science and information systems. 2024;21(3):1013–1031.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.121.2025.14-23

Globalisation, accompanied by the industrial leadership of «developed countries», is being replaced by regionalisation, which is built on conditions of equality and cooperation in common interests. The EU and the Eurasian Economic Union are illustrative examples of the international organisation of regional economic integration. In the context of changes in the architecture of the global technological system, the EAEU faces the task of deepening scientific and technical co-operation. On the agenda is the issue of reducing the level of import dependence in a number of types of finished products, the solution to these issues is associated with the involvement of research base: Eurasian technology platforms, the work of which is aimed at consolidating the scientific potential of the EAEU countries on the way to achieving technological sovereignty. The article analyses the organisation of scientific and technical cooperation in the EU in order to use this experience to solve problems and justify the prospects of scientific and technical cooperation and industrial cooperation within the EAEU.

References:

1. Decision of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council of 11.12.2020 No. 12: Strategic Directions for the Development of Eurasian Economic Integration until 2025. Effective date: 12.01.2021.

2. Platonova I.N. et al. International Economic Relations in the Global Economy: textbook for universities. Moscow: Yurait, 2023. 528 p.

3. Smitienko B.M. et al. World Economy in 2 Parts. Part 1: textbook for universities / edited by B.M. Smitienko, N.V. Lukyanovich. – 4th ed., revised. and additional. Moscow: Yurait, 2023. 216 p.

4. Ignatova O.V., Orlova N.L., Gorbunova O.A., Ason T.A. Global Economy and International Economic Relations. Workshop: Textbook for Universities / edited by O.V. Ignatova. Moscow: Yurait, 2023. 212 p.

5. Glazyev S.Yu. Problems of Development of Eurasian Economic Integration: How to Resolve Them? Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2022; 3 (41). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-razvitiya-evraziyskoy-ekonomicheskoy-integratsii-kak-ih-razreshit

6. Glazyev S.Yu. On Strategic Directions of Development of the EAEU. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2020;1 (31). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-strategicheskih-napravleniyah-razvitiya-eaes

7. Glazyev S.Yu. EAEU – EU: Prospects for a Comprehensive Economic Agreement. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2019;4 (30). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/eaes-es-perspektivy-vseobemlyuschego-ekonomicheskogo-soglasheniya

8. Glazyev S.Yu., Tkachuk S.P. On the Parameters of Economic Development in the EAEU until 2035. International Trade and Trade Policy. 2023;9(1):90–112.

9. Federal State Statistics Service. URL: https://www.gks.ru/

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.121.2025.5-13

Approaches to ensuring the sustainability of the economic supersystem of Russia and Belarus in the event of a nuclear attack are formulated. The technology under consideration is proposed as an integral part of the infrastructural segment of the economic supersystem for work in the context of implementing complex special projects (operations) with the adoption of justified management decisions that fit into the boundaries of trust between the command center and the operational zone, focused on the priorities of the strategy for conducting the SVO.

References:

1. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L. The world community in conditions of supercritical bifurcation. Management of complex organizational and technical systems in conditions of supercritical situations: Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference, Moscow, April 21-22, 2022. Moscow: Institute of Economic Strategies, 2022. pp. 9-12.

2. Ageev A.I. The role of sanctions, conflicts and special operations: reflections on the future. Part 1. Scientific Bulletin of the defense-industrial complex of Russia. 2023;4:66-74.

3. Ageev A.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Russia in a supercritical situation: managing the restoration of life support functions to overcome the consequences of a natural macrodisaster. Economic strategies. 2021;23(5 (179)):28-35.

4. Makarov V.L., Ageev A.I., Bakhtizin A.R., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Modeling the Consequences of a Nuclear Strike. Economic Strategies. 2022;24(4 (184)):6-16.

5. Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. New Possibilities of Electromagnetic Pulse Attacks on Critical Infrastructure Facilities. Transformation of Modern Warfare: Proceedings of the III All-Russian Scientific Conference, Omsk, February 16, 2024. Omsk: Military Academy of Logistics named after General of the Army A.V. Khrulev, 2024. pp. 108-112.

6. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L. New Great War: Chronicles of a Well-Forgotten Future. Economic Strategies. 2014;16(6-7(122-123)):16-33.

7. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L. Strategic Predetermination of Special Military Operations in the World Supersystem. Economic Strategies. 2023;25(4(190)):6-19.

8. Ageev A.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Implementation of Troop Command and Management of Civilian Facilities as a Single Hybrid Battlefield. Neurocomputers and Their Application: Abstracts of the XX All-Russian Scientific Conference, Moscow, March 22, 2022. Moscow: MGPPU, 2022. pp. 31-33.

9. Loginov E.L., Grabchak E.P., Epishkin I.I., Derkach A.K. Using quantum computing with the formation of a single computational space of ultra-large dimensions in the sphere of supplies of fuel and energy resources in the context of special period situations. Artificial societies. 2024;19(2).

10. Ageev A.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Using supercomputer technologies to manage the work of ultra-large organizational systems in the implementation of complex special projects (operations). Microeconomics. 2024;1:5-10.

11. Makarov V.L., Bakhtizin A.R., Loginov E.L. Application of Economic and Mathematical Methods and Models of Optimal Planning in the Digital Economy of the Future (Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences and Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Prognostic Interpretation and Development of the Scientific Heritage of Nobel Laureates L.V. Kantorovich and V.V. Leontiev). Moscow: Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2022. 248 p.