DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.74-79

The article contains, for discussion purposes, an interpretation of such terms as “data economy” and “digital transformation” involved in the national project “Data Economy and Digital Transformation of the State”. The article examines the approach to forming the organizational structure of a new generation for the manufacturing sector of the economy based on creation of the global territorially distributed data catalogue and communication environment for industrial products.

References:

1. Treyer V.V. Produktsiya proizvodstvennogo naznacheniya: problemy i resheniya [Industrial Products: Problems and Solutions]. Standarty i kachestvo, 2020, no 3, pp. 58.

2. Glushkov V.M. Makroekonomicheskie modeli i printsipy postroeniya OGAS [Macroeconomic Models and Principles of Construction of OGAS]. Moscow, Statistika, 1975, 160 p.

3. Geyts B. Biznes so skorost’yu mysli [Business at the Speed of Thought]. Moscow, Eksmo-Press, 2001, 480 p.

4. Treyer V.V. O roli kommunikatsionnoy sredy dlya sozdaniya produktsii proizvodstvennogo naznacheniya [On the Role of Communication Environment for Creating Industrial Products]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2021, no 1, pp. 122–127, DOI: 10.33917/es-1.175.2021.122-127

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.80-87

The article dwells on the issues of implementing the strategy of sustainable innovative development of Russian regions as a basis for creating competitive advantages of territories and improving the quality of the population life. The work, in relation to the regions of Russia bordering China, describes the concept of “smart specialization” — a strategy for identifying priority areas for the regions development and enhancing specific types of economic activity, which involves exploiting the potential of their innovative growth, choosing a unique path with a focus on future development. The authors focus on the industry specialization of regions as a basis for determining directions of «smart specialization». As a result of the study, the authors propose the models of crossborder cooperation for the regions of Russia and China based on the «smart specialization» of the above regions.

References:

1. Voronov A.S. Upravlenie ustoychivym innovatsionnym razvitiem regional’nykh sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem: Monografiya [Management of Sustainable Innovative Development of Regional Socio-Economic Systems]. Monograph. Moscow, YuNITI-DANA, 2022, 287 p.

2. Aver’yanov M.A., Evtushenko S.N., Zhivaykin A.L., Kochetova E.Yu. Strategicheskoe planirovanie v usloviyakh vyzovov tsifrovoy transformatsii [Strategic Planning in the Face of Digital Transformation Challenges]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2024, no 1, pp. 54–61, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-1.193.2024.54-61

3. Orlova L.N. Osnovnye printsipy i podkhody k upravleniyu ustoychivym innovatsionnym razvitiem ekonomicheskikh system [Basic Principles and Approaches to Managing Sustainable Innovative Development of Economic Systems]. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2016, no 3, pp. 3–9.

4. Alekseev A.V. Vyyavlenie klyuchevykh spetsializatsiy regionov i klasternykh struktur v usloviyakh perekhoda k kontseptsii “umnoy spetsializatsii” (na primere Baykal’skogo makroregiona) [Identification of Key Specializations of Regions and Cluster Structures in the Context of the Transition to the Concept of “Smart Specialization” (using the Example of the Baikal Macroregion)]. Estestvenno-gumanitarnye issledovaniya, 2021, no 38(6), pp. 34–39.

5. Tagirov K.T., Glushchenko A.V., Dovgan’ E.A. Strategiya “umnoy spetsializatsii” regionov kak faktor innovatsionnogo razvitiya [The Strategy of “Smart Specialization” of Regions as a Factor of Innovative Development]. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski, 2023, no 1, pp. 152–156.

6. Kroll H. Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice — Leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 2015, no 23(10), pp. 2079–2098, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036

7. Sotarauta M. Smart specialization and place leadership: Dreaming about shared visions, falling into policy traps? Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2018, no 5(1), pp. 190–203, DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2018.1480902

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.88-95

The state and municipal property management system is a set of agreed methods and means of targeted influence on the subjects of management process in order to achieve specified goals. The principle of maximizing the income received cannot be used as the basis for assessing the management of state and municipal proper ty objects due to the public nature of this category. In addition to the general principles of managing state and municipal proper ty inherent in the existing mixed economy, it is also necessary to take into account specific ones that meet the requirements of the transition period.

These include: compliance of the content and methods of management with the nature of reforms and, first and foremost, with ensuring progressive institutional shifts in the economy; focus of management on overcoming the systemic crisis of the economy and implementing its restructuring; compliance of organizational elements of management with the tasks of implementing industrial, investment, innovation and other policy areas.

References:

1. Rozhkov E.V. Ispol’zovanie zemli v granitsakh munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya kak polozhitel’nyy opyt upravleniya krupnym gorodom [Use of Land within the Boundaries of a Municipality as a Positive Experience in Managing a Large City]. Vestnik soveta molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov Chelyabinskoy oblasti, 2022, vol. 1, no 1(36), pp. 69–75.

2. Bagaeva L.E., Kondratenko Z.K. Stanovlenie i reformirovanie zakonodatel’stva o privatizatsii munitsipal’nogo imushchestva [Formation and Reform of Legislation on the Privatization of Municipal Property]. Vestnik Mariyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoricheskie nauki. Yuridicheskie nauki, 2019, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 166–172, DOI: 10.30914/2411-3522-20195-2-166-172.

3. Akhmatova A.M., Lushinkova T.Yu. Bol’shaya privatizatsiya: tseli, zadachi, osobennosti realizatsii v rossiyskoy ekonomike [Large-scale Privatization: Goals, Objectives, Implementation Features in the Russian Economy]. Obshchestvo, ekonomika, upravlenie, 2018, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 10–16.

4. Mal’ginov G.N., Radygin A.D. Pervye itogi privatizatsionnoy programmy 2017–2019 gg. i osnovnye voprosy upravleniya gosudarstvennym imushchestvom [The First Results of the Privatization Program 2017–2019 and the Main Issues of State Property Management]. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii, 2018, vol. 25, no 6, Iyun’ — iyul’, pp. 42–55.

5. Grigor’ev L.M., Kurdin A.A. Nereshennyy vopros legitimnosti chastnoy sobstvennosti v Rossii [The Unresolved Question of the Legitimacy of Private Property in Russia]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2016, no 1, pp. 36–62.

6. Gengut Yu.L. Metodologiya statisticheskogo issledovaniya protsessov privatizatsii gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo imushchestva na territorii Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Methodology of Statistical Research of Privatization Processes of State and Municipal Property on the Territory of the Russian Federation]. Regional’noe razvitie: elektronnyy nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal, 2014, no 2, pp. 112–119.

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.96-101

Over the past three centuries, economic liberalism has emerged as a global cultural norm that permeates international institutions and business practices. Global turbulence has coincided with degradation of the idea of liberalism; corporate leaders feel the need for change, but don’t associate the transformation goals with exhaustion of the liberal model.

References:

1. Vtulkina N., Firsov A. Khrupkaya, trevozhnaya, nelineynaya, nepostizhimaya [Fragile, Disturbing, Non-linear, Incomprehensible]. Forbes, 2022, 5 sentyabrya, available at: https://www.forbes.ru/forbeslife/476185-vse-v-bani-pocemu-tak-nazyvaetsa-novaa-trevoznaa-epoha-i-kak-v-nej-zit

2. Bashnin A.V., Ozols O.K. Kto upravlyaet IT krupnykh industrial’nykh kompaniy? [Who Manages the IT of Large Industrial Companies?]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2024, no 3(195), pp. 60–67, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-3.195.2024.60-67

3. Belousov L.V. Biologicheskiy morfogenez [Biological Morphogenesis]. Moscow, URSS, 2023, 256 p.

4. Wonga M.L., Cleland C.E., Arend D.J., Bartlettd S., Cleaves H.J., Demarestc H., Prabhua A., Lunineg J.I., Hazen R.M. On the roles of function and selection in evolving systems. PNAS, 2023, vol. 120, no 43, e2310223120.

5. Sharma A., Czégel D., Lachmann M., Kempes C.P., Walker S.I., Cronin L. Assembly theory explains and quantifies selection and evolution. Nature, vol. 622, October 12, 2023.

6. Budanov V.G. Metodologiya sinergetiki v postneklassicheskoy nauke i v obrazovanii [Synergetics Methodology in Post-nonclassical Science and Education]. Moscow, LKI, 2009, 240 p.

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.102-109

The purpose of the study is to form the value foundations of the methodology for compatibility of the society paradigms and society subsystems. Mutually complementary types of value theories and dual understanding of values are analyzed. The article explores the common values of the society paradigms, including sustainable development, social justice; inclusiveness, equality and human rights protection. Necessary composition of aspects of the value foundations for methodology of compatibility of society paradigms is formed and a structural scheme of paradigms compatibility of society spheres is compiled.

References: 

1. Morozov V.A. Metodologiya sovmestimosti paradigm obshchestva: filosofsko-psikhologicheskie i sistemotekhnicheskie osnovaniya [Methodology of compatibility for society paradigms: philosophical-psychological and system-technical foundations]. Menedzhment i biznes-administrirovanie. Moscow, ID “Ekonomicheskaya gazeta”, 2024, no 2, pp. 209–217.

2. D’yui Dzh. Obshchestvo i ego problem [Society and its problems]. Per. s angl. I.I. Myurberg, A.B. Tolstova, E.N. Kosilovoy. Moscow, Ideya-Press, 2002, 160 p.

3. Sheler M. Resentiment v strukture moraley [Resentment in the morals structure]. Per. s nem. A.N. Malinkina. Saint Petersburg, Nauka, 1999, 282 p.

4. Vindel’band V. Istoriya filosofii [History of philosophy]. Per. s nem. A.I. Vvedenskogo. Moscow, KANON-press, 1998, 548 p.

5. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie: struktura, istoricheskaya evolyutsiya [Theoretical knowledge: structure, historical evolution]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya, 2000, 743 p.

6. Salas S.D. Moral’ XXI veka [Morality of the 21st century]. Moscow, Kodeks, 2013, 483 p.

7. Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsiy: ocherki o germenevtike [Conflict of Interpretations: Essays on Hermeneutics]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt, 2008, 695 p.

8. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Tsennosti kul’tury i razvitie obshchestva [Cultural values and development of societ y]. Moscow, ID GVShE, 2007, 528 p.

9. Anopchenko T.Yu., Savon D.Yu. Ustoychivoe razvitie: opyt, problemy, perspektivy [Sustainable development: experience, challenges, prospects]. Moscow, Institut ustoychivogo razvitiya Obshchestvennoy palaty Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Tsentr ekologicheskoy politiki Rossii, 2011, p. 120.

10. Morozov V.A. Dukhovnaya ekonomika i sovmestimost’ obshchestva. Teoriya sovmestimosti [Spiritual economy and compatibility of society. Compatibility theory]. Moscow, Dashkov i K°, 2021, 576 p.

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.110-111

The novel “Reconstruction” by journalist and musician Boris Igorevich Lifanovsky plunges into realit y, which, according to the author, “should remain in the past.”

To celebrate the 80th anniversary of the Soviet people’s victory over fascist Germany and militarist Japan we continue to publish materials from the personal archives of participants in the Great Patriotic War, which will be included in Volume XIX of the “History Told by the People” project

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.199.2025.4-5