Many claim that it is impossible to reform “socialist” societies, that their collapse was inevitable. But there is the Chinese experience, which does not correspond to this interpretation…

To cope with the emerging socio-economic challenges alone, without support of other countries is beyond the power of any state.

Having won the Patriotic War in 1812, the Russian people saved their mother country from foreign oppression, defended its honor and independence.

Rapid economic growth of China, India and other largepopulation countries creates the problem of employment in developed countries and countries with transition economies, including Russia.

A cluster of the current crisis – is not a sign of the end of history, it serves as an impetus for new immense transformations, including the waves of epochal and basic innovations, which will take probably the whole space of the second quarter of the XXI century, and perhaps even more.

In my opinion, the market overcomes the state because they put an equals sign between business and economy. Business exists within the economy, but not equals to it. And only the state responsible for the economy and for the fates of people, as opposed to business, responsible only for the fate of profits, is capable to represent the interests of society as a whole.

The crises of transition period require elaboration of common understanding of the prospects for future development and integration of efforts of all states.

The term “integralism” will become the key to understanding the main content of the epoch-making innovations – formation of society in the XXI century.