DOI: 10.33917/es-3.169.2020.80-89

The article analyzes the causes of population dysontogenesis-a hidden process of loss of human subjectivity: the destruction of its psychophysiological and psychosocial qualities necessary for the normal activity of society. Violations caused by unformed structures of the child’s brain during the period of socialization in the family and school are hardly noticeable in a state of comfort, but they manifest themselves under normative and especially peak psychophysiological loads: deviant behaviors, educational failure, deterioration of health and loss of reproductive functions.
The consolidation of dysontogenesis in generations X, Y, and Z occurs through international educational standards that simplify educational programs and reduce didactic requirements to a level beyond which pathophenomenes become barely noticeable, but continue to accumulate statistically at the lower limit of the norm. Compensation for impaired functions occurs at the expense of modern means of digital communication-there is a non-specific “swarm” subjectivity: emotionally unstable, easily suggestible representatives of generations Y and Z become the main resource base of extremist and terrorist organizations.
The loss of basic social functions of goal-setting and control, empathy and passionarity in generations X, Y, Z, a simplified view of reality, increased lability and network conformism, decreased libido, and redirection of creative energy to the virtual-all this leads to the cessation of reproduction of the properties of society as a system structure. Restoration of systemogenetic development is possible only if the basic functions of the social state — science, education and upbringing-are provided.

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.167.2020.108-117

The authors postulate that modern destructive phenomena in society are associated with the conflict of regulators-attractors at the critical moment of “Re-Quantization of Reality” — at the time of transition from mass-kinetic regulation of system constructions to the dominant information-semantic regulation, which has a higher level of complexity. In society projection of this meta-process manifests itself globally, ends historic era of traditional politics and Economics as Topopulation “self-regulation”, ensuring the satisfaction of vital needs of humanity on the basis of technical progress and opens a new era of Psychosocial regulation systems based on the implementation of the Anthropic principle of regulation — to meet the higher needs for creative activity and participation in the development of the Universe. The most important property and a necessary condition of Anthropic regulation are the moral qualities of man, limiting the possibility of introducing entropy into the structure of information and semantic constructs. Arbitrary science-based Anthropic regulation allows for a crisis-free transition to Psychosocial formation on the basis of existing opportunities: institutional (constitutional) properties of the social state of the Russian Federation, as well as humanitarian and environmental properties of Closing technologies that allow once and for all to “close the issue” with the life of the human population and move to the direct creative process of psychosocial construction and humanistic transformation of reality

The article continues the cycle of studies devoted to the study of the “crisis of crises” of the human population caused by the “re-quantization of reality” — the transition from the outdated forms of Zoopopulation to the new Psychosocial formation; at the same time, it is noted that the “Image of a bright future” as a system-forming factor of the New World is distorted by subjective and objective reasons. Among the objective reasons that impede his perception, the authors see a sharp threshold increase in the level of complexity of all system constructions, including society, which requires immediate changes in the modern methodology of science. Subjective factors are the persistent attempt to preserve the obsolete global world order and stagnate the development of mankind by various methods of social destruction, primarily by creating artificial inequality. In response to the specific Russian question “What to do?”, The authors propose the obvious: revival and transition to dominance of higher forms of motivation, development of moral and ethical qualities as relevant anti-entropic factors and development of closing technologies as the highest form of livelihood of the population — all on the platform of social of the state.