DOI: 10.33917/es-6.204.2025.42-49

The objective criterion of management are not ratings and assessments, but results. Since “any modeling is carried out by humans and for humans” [1], we are talking about increasing the quality of people’s life in the relevant public legal entity (hereinafter PLE), including their safety, and about profits of the relevant corporations. For this, an information model of power is important, and it is important for managers to move from thinking in words to thinking in equations [1]. “Less pompous phrases, more simple everyday work and concern for a pood of bread and a pood of coal” [2].

References:

1. Glushkov V.M. Kibernetika. Voprosy truda i praktika [Cybernetics: Issues of Work and Practice]. Moscow, Nauka, 1986. 488 s.

2. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy [Complete works]. Vol. 39. Moscow, Izd-vo politicheskoy literatury, 1972, p. 23.

3. Shumpeter Y. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: Issledovanie predprinimatel’skoy pribyli, kapitala, kredita, protsenta i tsikla kon”yunktury [Theory of Economic Development: An Investigation of Entrepreneurial Profit, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle]. Moscow, URSS, 2024, 400 p.

4. Lange O. Vvedenie v ekonomicheskuyu kibernetiku [Introduction to Economic Cybernetics]. Moscow, Progress, 1968, 207 p.

5. Vanchurin V., Wolf Yu.I., Katsnelson M.I., Kooni E.V. Toward a theory of evolution as multilevel learning. PNAS, February 4, 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120037119

6. Bychkova N.Yu., Kiselev V.G. Ustoychivoe razvitie upravlyaemoy sistemy kak rezul’tat evolyutsii upravlencheskogo kapitala [Sustainable Development of a Managed System as a Result of the Evolution of Management Capital]. Innovatsii i investitsii, 2025, no 7, pp. 180–184, DOI: 10.24412/2307-180X-2025-7-180-184

7. Glaz’ev S.Yu. Za gorizontom kontsa istorii [Beyond the Horizon of the End of History]. Moscow, Prospekt, 2021, 416 p.

8. Gusakov V.G. Doklad na Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Strategiya razvitiya ekonomiki Belarusi: vyzovy, instrumenty realizatsii i perspektivy”, 16 noyabrya 2023 g. [Presentation at the International Scientific and Practical Conference «Strategy for the Development of the Belarusian Economy: Challenges, Implementation Tools, and Prospects,» November 16, 2023], available at: https://youtu.be/tDQ5x6v1t-0

9. Bychkova N.Yu. Soznanie kak ekonomicheskaya kategoriya [Consciousness as an Economic Category]. Innovatsii i investitsii, 2022, no 12, pp. 22–29, DOI: 10.24412/2307-180X-2022-12-22-29

10. Zhukov N.I. Filosofskie osnovy kibernetiki [Philosophical Foundations of Cybernetics]. Minsk, Izd-vo BGU, 1976, 224 p.

11. Druker P.F. Effektivnyy rukovoditel’ [Effective Leader]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber (MIF), 2012, 240 p.

12. Bychkova N.Yu. Samodostatochnost’ cheloveka kak osnova samodostatochnosti sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh sistem i mnogopolyarnogo mira [Human Self-Sufficiency as the Basis for Self-Sufficiency of Socio-Economic Systems and a Multipolar World]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2024, no 1(193), pp. 93–99, DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.93-99

DOI: 10.33917/mic-6.101.2021.83-102

The article examines the relationship between socio-economic indicators characterizing the level of economic security of the state and the growth of protest activity of the population. Based on the socio-historical analysis, a generalizing conclusion is made that the economic downturn, reflecting the cyclical nature of economic processes, naturally affects the decline in the standard of living of the population and thereby produces further impoverishment of the population. Using the example of a historical analogy with pre-revolutionary Russia, the calculation data defining the boundaries of modern poverty are given. In turn, growing economic differentiation and poverty create an arc of social tension and form a favorable environment for the manifestation of social protests.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-5.100.2021.5-13

The article considers the problem of social tension from the position of economic determinism. The author approaches the consideration of this issue from the point of view of the theory of the expediency of the existence of a socio-economic system as a whole. At the same time, the integrity of the system will be determined, according to the author, by the total dependence of a number of stressful factors that produce an economic crisis, affect the state of social stability and the level of social tension. The author considers the crisis not only as a disorganizing beginning of the organizational whole, but also as a process of rational changes, as a natural reaction of the socio-economic system, which allows diagnosing the state of its stability, development trends and the most vulnerable elements. According to the author, the determination of critical parameters that characterize the oscillation of the system and the degree of its stability will allow to regulate the level of social tension and to localize the foci of instability in the constituent components of the system in a timely manner, thus leveling the possible prerequisites for a social explosion.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-4.99.2021.5-11

The article defines the purpose of the study, which consists in the need to analyze the existing and projected models and scenarios for the development of Russian socio-economic systems. The analysis is carried out based on the understanding of the socio-economic system as a partial image of reality in the individual of public consciousness. A brief description of the existing socio-economic models in Russia and strategies for their development is given. The conclusion is made about the importance of the process of choosing methods for describing models of development of socio-economic systems. The goals and disadvantages of the proposed methods of describing the model of the development of socio-economic systems.

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.167.2020.136-143

The article presents a new vision for solving the problem of managing economic security of the socio-economic system in the context of a developing knowledge economy through the strategy of systemogenesis for labor activity knowledge. The strategy of knowledge systemogenesis allows to see the labor activity of the socio-economic system holistically, taking into account possible alternatives and evaluating these alternatives in the context of formalized systems and subsystems of subjects’ labor actions. The strategy is focused on maximizing utility of the consumed knowledge of labor actions in the face of an ever-increasing amount of knowledge and differentiating its quality in the sense of utility. This allows to manage the economic security of socio-economic system by optimizing the total and marginal utility of the knowledge consumed in your own systems and in competing with respect to the subject of management ones, as well as to protect own interests in a developing knowledge economy from the control effects of competing management entities