DOI: 10.33917/es-4.202.2025.86-97

The article analyzes socio-economic situation of workers in the mining industry (from 2019 to 2025) and identifies trends in transition from traditional to innovative tools in the personnel’s work activities. It was also discovered that introduction of artificial intelligence technologies helps to minimize the human factor and ensures maximum production ef ficiency.

The present article also examines transformation of the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the mining industry representatives, their social consequences, in particular, the impact of mining work on psychophysical health.

The paper also studies development of a nonlinear algorithm with the help of ar tificial intelligence methods, including a neural network and cognitive modules, as a factor in transition from traditional to innovative tools in the work of mining personnel, having direct significance for humans.

References:

1. Anchishkin A.I. Nauka, tekhnika, ekonomika [Science, Technology, Economics]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 1986. 383 p.

2. Kheynman S.A. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya revolyutsiya segodnya i zavtra [Scientific and Technological Revolution Today and Tomorrow]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1977, 328 p.

3. L’vov D.S. Effektivnoe upravlenie tekhnicheskim razvitiem [Effective Management of Technical Development]. Moscow, Ekonomika, 1990, 255 p.

4. L’vov D.S., Glaz’ev S.Yu. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty upravleniya NTP [Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Scientific and Technical Progress Management]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody, 1986, no 5, pp. 793–804.

5. Glaz’ev S.Yu. Teoriya dolgosrochnogo tekhniko-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Theory of Long-Term Technical and Economic Development]. Moscow, Vladar, 1993, 310 p.

6. Peres K. Tekhnologicheskie revolyutsii i finansovyy kapital. Dinamika puzyrey i periodov protsvetaniya [Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. Dynamics of Bubbles and Periods of Prosperity]. Moscow, Delo, 2011, 232 p.

7. Dosi G. Technical Change and Industrial Transformation: The Patterns of Industrial Dynamics. Technical Change and Industrial Transformation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. 1984. 338 p.

8. Perez C. Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems. Futures, 1983, vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 357–375.

9. Freeman C. Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London, Pinter Publishers, 1987. 155 p.

10. Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, vol. 52, iss. 6, 2023, 104765.

11. Erebak S., Turgut T. Anxiety about the speed of technological development: Effects on job insecurity, time estimation, and automation level preference. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 32, iss. 2, 2021, 100419.

12. Eum W., Lee J-D. The co-evolution of production and technological capabilities during industrial development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 63, 2022, pp. 454–469.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-3.110.2023.12-23

The paper examines the issue of determining the innovative potential of the economy at various levels of its organization – firms, branches of the macrosystem. The purpose of the study is to summarize the main methods for measuring and forming innovative potential, as the most important condition for measuring innovative development. The methodology consists of the theory of innovative and technological development, comparative analysis, methods for measuring innovative potential, generalizations and taxonomy. The general result of the analysis is the substantiation of the position that it is difficult to imagine the growth of the innovative potential of the economy outside the effective interaction of the production, scientific and technical and management systems. Methods for measuring innovative potential according to various criteria are typified within the framework of the resource and effective basic approaches. The results are of theoretical and methodological significance, since they demonstrate what negative and positive characteristics have absolute, relative and integral, as well as rating indicators for assessing innovative potential. The author also gives an updated definition of innovation potential within the framework of the resource approach as the presence of unused estimated resources that provide or potentially affect the innovation process. As a result, a conclusion is made about the ambiguity of assessing the innovative potential and the limitations of each of the approaches developed so far. This outlines the prospect for further research on the theory of socio-economic potential, where innovation potential can be considered as an integral part.

References:

1.Babkin A.V., Zdolnikova S.V. Methodology for assessing the innovative potential of integrated industrial structures. Economics and Management. 2017;8 (142):54-66. (In Russ.).

2. Glazunova V.V. Modern problems in assessing the innovative potential of organizations. Internet journal «NAUKOVEDENIE». 2016;8(1). (In Russ.). URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/78EVN116.pdf

3. Divaeva E.A. Fundamentals of assessing the level of innovative potential and assessing its level: Monograph. M.: Paleotype, 2007. 144 p.

4. Zhits G.I. Abilities for the implementation of opportunities: continuation of discussions about the methodology for assessing the innovative potential of socio-economic systems of various levels of complexity. Innovations. 2008;8 (118): 75-78. (In Russ.).

5. Kuzin N.A. Classification of innovations in the modern economy. Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2015;9-1 (18):56-60. (In Russ.).

6. Maskaikin E.P., Artser T.V. Innovative potential of the region: essence, structure, assessment methodology and development directions. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. 2009;21 (154):47-53. (In Russ.).

7. Muller V.K. English-Russian dictionary. M.: State publishing house of foreign and national dictionaries, 1963. 1192 p.

8. Ozhegov S.I. Dictionary of the Russian language / edited by Shvedova N.Yu. M.: Russian language, 1987. 798 p.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-6.95.2020.30-39

Each enterprise in its activities often faces the problem of choosing the optimal investment direction that will ensure it receives the maximum income in the future. The article considers risk management as one of the key subsystems of the enterprise strategic development system. Methods of evaluating the effectiveness of investment projects with consideration of risks are studied and systematized, and their comparative analysis is carried out. A practical example with calculations is presented. The results are analyzed. The directions of possible investments are briefly described.