DOI: 10.33917/mic-6.125.2025.12-20

The article goal is to analyze the digital technology introduction into Russian education, including the distance education transition in Russian universities and schools during the COVID-19. Several scientific analysis methods were used in transformation analysis: method of analysis and synthesis, abstraction, generalization, description, induction, deduction. In the transformation processes during the COVID-19 changes are observed in the perception of students and schoolchildren with the digital technology introduction in the professional educational field from March 2020 up to date. The article reveals the concepts of traditional and innovative education forms. It was found the digital technology introduction didn`t help to minimize the human factor and didn`t ensure the educational stuff into the educational process. The work identified the results of Russian education transformation processes after COVID-19, as well as the transition specifics from education traditional forms to innovative ones, their social consequences, in particular, the distance education introduction impact on psychophysical health.

References:

1. Alekseeva M.I. Traditions and Innovations in Modern University Education. Humanitarian Research. 2017. No. 4. URL: https://human.snauka.ru/2017/04/23493

2. Uvarov A.Yu., Gable E., Dvoretskaya I.V., et al. Challenges and Prospects of Digital Transformation of Education. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Institute of Education. Edited by A.Yu. Uvarov, I.D. Frumin. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2019. 343 p.

3. Grunt E.V., Belyaeva E.A., Lissitsa S. Distance Education in the Context of a Pandemic: New Challenges for Russian Higher Education. Prospects of Science and Education. 2020;5 (47):45–58.

4. Rezer T.M. Transformations of Teaching Activities during the Pandemic. Development Strategies for Social Communities, Institutions, and Territories. Proceedings of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference: in two volumes. Vol. 1. Ed. by A.P. Bagirov, Yekaterinburg, 2022. pp. 340–343.

5. Romanova Z.L. Problems and Prospects of Using Online Learning Technologies during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State Institute of Culture. 2022;1 (50):124–129.

6. Parkhomenko A.N., Ageeva Yu.V., Maloletkova A.A., Shemonaev V.I. Analysis of the Educational Process during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Dental Departments. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2021. No. 1. URL: https://science-education.ru/article/view?id=30444

7. Lukashin Yu.V., Chernyaeva T.N. Risks of Socialization of Children and Adolescents in Conditions of Forced Self-Isolation (During the Coronavirus Pandemic). Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy. 2021;9:111–118.

8. Rogacheva P.S., Semergey S.V. Problems of Distance Education During a Pandemic. Bulletin of Maikop State Technological University. 2020;12(4):85–93.

9. Sunnatova R.I. Experience of Distance School Learning: Possible Risks to the Success of Students’ Socialization. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy. 2020;77(9):69–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2020.9.12

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-5.185.2022.6-11

The goal of the study is an attempt to rethink the role of Foreign Direct Investment, Industrial Policy and others phenomenon.

The author propose a new analysis of them in today’s conditions and circumstances. This article uses statistics published by OECD and IMF. The article pays particular attention to different approaches of certain countries (USSR, Russia, Italy, South Korea) in the field of import of Foreign Direct Investment and in the field of the Industrial Policy. Based on many years of the author’s experience in the Russian banking sphere and Russian business, the author puts forward certain economic advice to regulators in Russia.

References:

1. IMF. World Economic Outlook — Rising Caseloads, a Disrupted Recovery, and Higher Inflation. Washington, DC, 2022.

2. IMF. World Economic Outlook — War Sets Back the Global Recovery. Washington, DC, 2022.

3. Soboleva Inna. Les experts russes redoutent une guerre mondiale d’ici dix ans. FR. Russia Beyond, 2013, April 16, available at: https://fr.rbth.com/tech/2013/04/16/les_experts_russes_redoutent_une_guerre_mondiale_dici_dix_ans_23165.

4. Glazyev S. How to win the war. Top War, 2014, July 26, available at: https:www.en.topwar.ru.

5. Kondratieff N. The World Economy and its Conjunctures during and after the War. Moscow, International Kondratieff Foundation, 2004.

6. Trotsky L. La courbe du d velopppement capitaliste. Marxists, 1923, Avril 21, available at: https://www.marxists.org/francais/trotsky/oeuvres/1923/04/lt19230421.htm.

7. Pokidchenko M.G. Sushchestvuet li ekonomicheskii tsikl? [Is there an Economic Cycle]. Voprosy teoreticheskoi ekonomiki, 2017, no 1, pp. 66–73, available at: http://questionset.ru/files/arch/2017/2017-N1/VTE_2017_1.pdf.

8. Ershov M.V, Lokhmachev V.F., Tatuzov V.Yu, Tanasova A.S. Global’nyi krizis (sravnitel’nyi analiz tsiklicheskikh protsessov) [About Tendencies of Global Crisis]. Bankovskoe delo, 2009, no 5, pp. 16–20, available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33338082.

9.FDI in Fugures. Paris, OECD, 2022, April, available at: www.oecd.org.

10. Putin V. Economic Tasks. Working Day, 2012, January, 30, available at: http://archive.premier.gov.ru/eng/events/news/17888/

11. Ministerial Decree No. 328 validating the State Program of the Russian Federation “Development of industry and increase of its competitiveness” (аpril 2014), available at: http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/rus170671.pdf.

12. Federal Law No. 488-FZ of December 31, 2014 “On Industrial Policy”. FAO, available at: https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/ru/c/LEX-FAOC170671/

13. Vstrecha s chlenami pravitel’stva [Meeting with Governments Members]. Ofitsial’nyi sait Prezidenta RF, 2022, 23 marta, available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/68037.

14. Idrisov G.I. Promyshlennaya politika Rossii v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Towards Modern Industrial Policy for Russia]. Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara, 2016.

15. Strukturno-investitsionnaya politika v tselyakh ustoichivogo rosta i modernizatsii ekonomiki: Nauchnyi doklad [Structural and Investment Policy for Sustainable Growth and Modernization of the Economy: Scientific Report]. Pod red. V.V. Ivantera. Moscow, INP RAN, 2016.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-5.179.2021.96-101

The author suggests a non-customary approach to the study and forecasting of the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and the Global Value Chains (GVC) — within the modern framework of Kondratieff long waves hypothesis. Taking into account long waves (about 40 years), in 2009 the author warned about the possible economic crises in Russia in 2014–2015,2020 and such crises actually happened. There were three economic crises in Russia — 40 years after the world economic crises of 1969, 1974–1975 and 1980. The question is raised about the large-scale spread of COVID-19. Also the author concludes that it is necessary to continue studying long waves approach with the aim of its use in forecasting.

DOI: 10.33917/es-4.170.2020.6-19

The world is changing rapidly and irreversibly. The critical value of accumulated macroeconomic imbalances requires radical managerial decisions. As a solution to the problem, catastrophe just-in-time was chosen — preparation and implementation of key extreme events aimed at fundamentally reformatting the global economic management structure with achieving a new global investment and financial cycle based on massive issue of US dollars. The classical model of transforming global crises into the format of phased global financial iterations has now been augmented with a new strategic tool — the coronavirus. The result of implementing the coronavirus superstrategy, which was similar in power to the third world war and successfully replaced it, is the shift in key macroeconomic determinants. The USA once again postponed financial collapse for 10–15 years. Dimension of the financial special operation is unprecedented in terms of resources, territorial scales and depth of impact: former key players voluntarily sacrifice their identity for the opportunity to remain on the Great Chessboard at least in the form of pawns. The other countries’ claims to world leadership have been completely removed. For Russia, unlike most countries — geo-economic competitors, coronavirus reality became a marker confirming the Great Power status. Elaboration of a strategy for the economic development of Russia in relation to new conditions is on the agenda