DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-3.177.2021.120-129

The purpose of the article is to determine the main directions of development of the Russian Academy of Sciences in cooperation with the executive and legislative authorities of Russia. As a rule, behind general phrases about the reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian society is poorly informed about the current activities of the Academy of Sciences. The authors set themselves the task of filling this gap, of course, by bringing in their own proposals and some vision of the tasks of the development of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The methodology of this work is a comparative analysis, approaches to setting strategic objectives for the development of science and planning this process. The results of the study made it possible to concretize the tasks of the RAS development, highlighting the segment where the Academy itself is obliged to make changes to solve the necessary tasks, as well as the area of responsibility for changes at the level of the executive and, separately, the legislative branch. In addition, the directions have been established in which the RAS has an undoubted success in implementation, requiring its increase, as well as the necessary organizational changes, the need for which is very high in the context of intensifying scientific competition and the advanced development of science. The set of proposals will make it possible to recreate the chain of “fundamental science — R&D — production”, attracting backbone corporations of a science-intensive and other profile to such interaction. The article proposes a system of promising changes in the activities of the Russian Academy of Sciences, substantiates the position that they are able to increase the efficiency of science, without reducing it to what science should give to the economy instantly.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-3.177.2021.110-119

A step-by-step and objective review of the history of the State Planning Committee of the USSR (Gosplan), presented by the authors, helps to form a holistic idea of how the power of the USSR arose and what objective necessity or what subjective factors led to a radical change in the political and socio-economic structure of the country.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-3.177.2021.100-109

In modern unstable economic conditions, when valuating unique or capital-intensive objects, it is more often value in use (investment one or user one) is determined. In this case, the calculations are based on the income approach, linking the future incomes of the asset under valuation and the risks of not receiving them. The article describes the latest advances in calculating techniques previously unknown in world practice, covering the variability of the capitalization rate over time and refined formulas for the risk build-up method.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-3.177.2021.90-98

Research methodology for studying the strategic potential of Russian appraisal companies is based on “Strategic Matrix of a Company” software package, whose algorithm implies analysis of qualitative and quantitative indicators that allow to create a complete profile of the company and to prepare a scenario forecast of its development. The main qualitative parameters under analysis include such criteria as the degree of innovation and services differentiation, the level of competition and the company’s position in the market, priority of certain strategic goals in the company’s activities, effectiveness of motivation, corporate culture, the ability to quickly gain access to necessary resources.

В беседе с Анной Юрьевной Исаевой, управляющим партнером, генеральным директором ООО «Профессиональная Группа Оценки», членом Апелляционного органа и рабочего органа по стратегии развития оценочной деятельности при  Минэкономразвития России, членом Президиума Экспертного совета, заместителем председателя Дисциплинарного комитета СРО Союз «Федерация специалистов оценщиков», MRICS, мы обсудили основные положения законопроекта «О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон „Об оценочной деятельности в Российской Федерации“ и отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации», принятого Государственной думой РФ в марте 2020 г., а также положительные и отрицательные нюансы работы компании в период действия режима  самоизоляции.

Сегодня оспаривание результатов государственной кадастровой оценки и справедливая оценка интересуют прежде всего правообладателя, поскольку кадастровая стоимость учитывается при определении налоговой базы по земельному налогу, налогу на имущество организаций и налогу на имущество физических лиц. О некоторых изменениях действующего законодательства рассказал начальник отдела нормативно-правового регулирования в сфере государственной кадастровой оценки Управления нормативно-правового регулирования в сферах регистрации недвижимости, геодезии и картографии Денис Евгеньевич Шереметьев.