DOI: 10.33917/es-2.206.2026.62-67

The article examines the problems of using a systems approach in modern management. Despite its recognized value, its widespread use is constrained by a key problem — the difficulty of developing systems thinking in managers. The authors note that only a small part of the developed strategies is implemented in practice, which is directly related to the deficit of this type of thinking. As a solution, it is proposed to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools that do not replace, but significantly enhance human cognitive abilities. The article contains a specific proposal for creating an ecosystem of AI assistants consisting of five interconnected modules. It is concluded that AI acts as the very “lever” that allows us to overcome the elitism of the systems approach and realize its potential in mass management practice.

References:

1. Pitersen V. Strategiya kak obuchenie: Novyy vzglyad na protsess sozdaniya tsennosti i bor’by za konkurentnoe preimushchestvo [Strategy as Learning: A New Look at Value Creation and Competitive Advantage]. Moscow, Intellektual’naya Literatura, 2020.

2. Senge P. Pyataya distsiplina: Iskusstvo i praktika samoobuchayushcheysya organizatsii [The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization]. Moscow, Olimp-Biznes, 2003, 406 p.

3. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L., Shkuta A.A. Primenenie neyrotekhnologiy v global’nykh sotsial’nykh kommunikatsiyakh, mezhdunarodnom biznese, nauke i gosupravlenii. Mirovye tendentsii i opyt Kitaya: Ucheb. posobie [Application of Neurotechnology in Global Social Communications, International Business, Science and Public Administration. Global Trends and China’s Experience: A Textbook]. Moscow, INES, 2021.

4. Mamardashvili M.K. Protsessy analiza i sinteza v knige “Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu” [The Processes of Analysis and Synthesis in My Philosophy]. Moscow, 1992.

5. Gvishiani D.M. Organizatsiya i upravlenie [Organization and Management]. Moscow, Izd-vo MGTU, 1998.

6. Ageev A.I. Rossiya v prostranstve i vremeni: strategii i tsikly [Russia in Space and Time: Strategies and Cycles]. Saint Petersburg, SPbGUP, 2005, 32 p.

7. Trubnikov N.N. O kategoriyakh “tsel'”, “sredstvo”, “rezul’tat” [About the Categories “Goal”, “Means”, “Result”]. Moscow, 1968.

8. Yudin E.G. Metodologiya nauki. Sistemnost’. Deyatel’nost’ [Methodology of Science. Systematicity. Activity]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 1997.

9. Druker P. Praktika menedzhmenta [Management Practice]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2015, 416 p.

10. Akoff R. Planirovanie budushchego korporatsii [Planning the Future of the Corporation]. Moscow, Sirin, 2002, 256 p.

11. Mintsberg G., Al’strand B., Lampel’ Zh. Strategicheskoe safari: Ekskursiya po debryam strategicheskogo menedzhmenta [Strategic Safari: A Journey Through the Wilds of Strategic Management]. Moscow, Al’pina Pablisher, 2013, 367 p.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.127.2026.44-52

The article is devoted to substantiating the importance of the concept of dynamic economic security of an enterprise in the context of digital transformation and high turbulence of the external environment. The limitations of traditional static models of «perimeter» protection, which lose their effectiveness due to information overload and non-linearity of economic processes, are analyzed. The hypothesis is substantiated that the level of security of modern business is determined by the quality and speed of management decisions. A dynamic security architecture based on a symbiosis of artificial intelligence (for 24/7 operational response) and collective intelligence (for strategic thinking) is proposed. The necessity of transition from extrapolation forecasting to scenario modeling and management of a multi-criteria choice is argued. The principles of business resilience are formulated as the ability to maintain a development trajectory through controlled changes and cognitive convergence of heterogeneous data.

References:

[1-21] See in no. 1/2026, p. 50-52.

22. Rittel H.W.J., Webber M.M. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences. 1973;4(2):155-169.

23. Keeney R.L., Raiffa H., Rajala D.W. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 1977. p. 403 URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3116639_Decisions_with_Multiple_Objectives_Preferences_and_Value_Trade-Offs

24. Taleb N.N. The Black Swan. Under the Sign of Unpredictability. Moscow: KoLibri, Azbuka-Atticus, 2012. 736 p.

25. Robinson J.B. Futures Under Glass: A Recipe for People Who Hate to Predict. Futures. 1990;22(9):820-842. DOI: 10.1016/0016-3287(90)90018-D

26. Gordeev V.V., Abramov V.I. Business Process Forecasting as a Decision-Making Tool within a Proactive Management Approach. Economics and Management. 2025;31(7):893-902. DOI 10.18334/evp.6.4.123876

27. Nikogosyan A.Z., Abramov V.I. Remote Dynamic Control in Transport Logistics: The Role and Benefits of the Internet of Things. Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions. 2025;5(4(157)):183-195. DOI 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2025.04.05.022.

28. Godet M. Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool. London: Economica, 2001. 269 p.

29. Ageev A.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. A New Model of Managing the Russian Economy in the Context of Hybrid Risks and Threats. Economic Strategies. 2025;5(203): 6-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-5.203.2025.6-19

30. McGrath R.G. The End of Competitive Advantage (translated from English by V.N. Egorova). Moscow: Binom. Lab. of Knowledge, 2013. 248 p.

31. Abramov V.I., Gordeev V.V., Stolyarov A.D. Digital Transformation of Industrial Enterprises into Digital Business Ecosystems: Structural Components and Practical Aspects of Implementation. Fundamental Research. 2024;9:78-85. DOI 10.17513/fr.43680

32. Abramov V.I., Stolyarov A.D. Digital Business Ecosystems: Typology and Design. Modern Economy Success. 2025;6:370-379. DOI 10.18334/vinec.15.4.124210

DOI: 10.33917/mic-1.126.2026.42-52

The article is devoted to substantiating the importance of the concept of dynamic economic security of an enterprise in the context of digital transformation and high turbulence of the external environment. The limitations of traditional static models of «perimeter» protection, which lose their effectiveness due to information overload and non-linearity of economic processes, are analyzed. The hypothesis is substantiated that the level of security of modern business is determined by the quality and speed of management decisions. A dynamic security architecture based on a symbiosis of artificial intelligence (for 24/7 operational response) and collective intelligence (for strategic thinking) is proposed. The necessity of transition from extrapolation forecasting to scenario modeling and management of a multi-criteria choice is argued. The principles of business resilience are formulated as the ability to maintain a development trajectory through controlled changes and cognitive convergence of heterogeneous data.

References:

1. Glazyev S.Yu. State and Prospects of the Sixth Technological Wave in the Russian Economy. Economics of Science. 2024;10(2):11-29. DOI 10.22394/2410-132X-2024-10-2-11-29

2. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Moscow: Eksmo, 2021. 208 p.

3. Cascio J. Facing the Age of Chaos. Medium. 2020. URL: https://medium.com/@cascio/facing-the-age-of-chaos-b00687b1f51d

4. Gantz J., Reinsel D. The Digital Universe in 2020: Big Data, Bigger Digital Shadows, and Biggest Growth in the Far East. IDC Analyze the Future. 2012. pp. 1-16. URL: https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spring13/cos598C/idc-the-digital-universe-in-2020.pdf

5. Simon H.A. Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World. Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest (ed. by M. Greenberger) Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971. pp. 37-72.

6. Abramov V.I., Arefyev D.V. Ecosystem Development of Enterprises: Opportunities, Risks, and Features of Assessing Their Digital Maturity. New in Economic Cybernetics. 2025;1:70-84. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.15165454

7. Teece D.J. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning. 2018;51:1. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007

8. Knight F.H. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Moscow: DELO Publishing House, 2003. 360 p.

9. Ackoff R.L. Management Misinformation Systems. Management Science. 1967;14(4). URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.14.4.B147

10. Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Moscow: AST, 2011. 656 p.

11. McAfee A., Brynjolfsson E. The Second Machine Age. Work, Progress, and Prosperity in the Age of New Technologies. Moscow: AST, 2017. 384 p.

12. Senge P. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Moscow: MIF. Business, 2018. 496 p.

13. Tett D. The Curse of Efficiency: The Mine Shaft Syndrome. How to Overcome Disunity in Life and Business. Moscow: Olimp-Business, 2017. 336 p.

14. Page S.E. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. 456 p.