Author page: Gerasimenko I.I.

The universal principles of Leonardo da Vinci’s competitive strategies and their adaptability to modern business in the context of digitalization

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.127.2026.61-72

It has been established that Leonardo da Vinci’s competitive strategies have universal principles that can be adapted to modern business. His methods of creating unique products, such as the «sfumato» technique and an individual approach to customers, correspond to modern differentiation strategies. The approach to personal brand formation and artificial scarcity anticipates modern luxury marketing practices. Leonardo’s flexible pricing strategies contain elements relevant to the digital economy. And the combination of art, engineering, and science in his work serves as a model for modern multidisciplinary strategies.

As the conducted research has shown, the basic principles of Leonardo’s competitive strategies demonstrate amazing stability over time and can serve as a valuable guideline for modern companies. This is especially true for: companies in the creative industries (design, architecture, advertising); luxury segment enterprises; innovative start-ups; premium professional services.

References:

1. Anikieva V.A. Digital assets as a reputation formation tool. In the collection: Youth Science Week of the Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade. Saint Petersburg, 2025. pp. 162-164.

2. Astratova G.V. Fundamentals of marketing: a textbook. Yekaterinburg: Ural Publishing House. University, 2024. 232 p.

3. Veretennikova O.V. Consumer value as the basis of sustainable enterprise development. Trade and the market. 2022;2(3-1 (63)):94-102.

4. Kondakova Yu.A. Application of price competition methods in the digital economy (using the randomized pricing method as an example). Bulletin of Economic and Sociological Research. 2024;2:19-26.

5. Kornienko N.N. Non-price competition in a market and mixed economy. In the collection: Fundamental foundations of science. Anapa, 2021. pp. 112-114.

6. Kuzmina E.S. Personal branding in the digital age of metamodernity. Scientific papers of the North-Western Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2025;16(1(68)):168-170.

7. Kuzminova T.N., Makeeva E.Z. Determination of indicators of the functioning of intangible assets to be improved and the list of works that lead to the improvement of intangible assets. In the collection: Modern financial accounting and reporting: problems and prospects of development. Moscow, 2024. pp. 53-60.

8. Laryanovsky I.S. Axiological analysis of post-non-classical scientific and technical knowledge based on the integral concept of values. Gilea: scientific bulletin. 2016;108(5):151-155.

9. Mavlyutova D.F., Sakhbieva A.I. Non-price competition as a tool for influencing consumer behavior. In the collection: Fundamental and applied research: concepts, techniques, innovations. Rostov-on-Don, 2022. pp. 358-362.

10. Novikova E.N., Martynova O.V., Antonchenko N.G. Marketing. Lecture notes. Kazan: KGEU, 2014. 100 p.

11. Odinaev F.B., Yelshin L.A. Spheres of realization of price and non-price competition in an unstable conjunctural environment. In the collection: XI International Youth Symposium on Management, Economics and Finance. Kazan, 2022. pp. 620-623.

Identification, identification of falsification and counterfeiting as tools to ensure the economic security of production and trade by the 43rd commodity group of the EAEU customs code of foreign economic activity

DOI: 10.33917/mic-1.120.2025.56-73

This article examines the organizational and economic aspects of identification, identification of falsification and counterfeiting as tools to ensure the economic security of production and trade of 43 commodity groups of the EAEU Customs Union (fur goods) in modern conditions. An analysis of the current situation shows that ensuring the economic security of the fur trade is not balanced in the Russian Federation and the state may lose the furring skills of industry operators, as well as the technological culture of manufacturing and wearing natural furs.

The state needs to create further conditions for the development of the domestic fur industry, ensuring economic security, countering low-quality counterfeit imports of fur products, which unscrupulous sellers sell, posing as Russian goods, and introduce protectionist measures to protect and support Russian producers.

References:

1. Annekar V.V. The «Honest mark» labeling system in the paradigm of non-food consumption of natural fur products. The Constitution. 2023;8(2). URL: https://kostumologiya.ru/PDF/16TLKL223.pdf

2. Beketov S.V. Mandatory labeling of fur products. Rabbit breeding issues. 2020;5-6:57-62.

3. Bystrova N.Yu., Akopova E.I. Determination of safety indicators of fur products. In the collection: Innovative technologies: leather, fur, chemical materials, production. Moscow, 2023. pp. 15-17.

4. Guz N.A., Bozhenova A.A. Introduction of product traceability systems: foreign experience and domestic practice. risk: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition. 2022;2:6-12.

5. Zalomaeva E.O. The process of making economic decisions and consumer behavior from the point of view of neuroeconomics (on the example of the fur market). In the collection: Economics and Innovation. Moscow, 2022. pp. 81-85.

6. Kvyatkovsky D.V. The impact of the introduction of the EGAIS «Honest Mark» labeling system on the turnover of counterfeit goods in Russia. Legal science. 2023;11»236-239.    

7. Kibzun V.N., Nagornaya N.P. Segmentation of consumers of fur products in a trading enterprise and forecasting demand for them. Bulletin of the Donbass National Academy of Construction and Architecture. 2021;1(147):34-42.

8. Kirsanova E.A., Bodryakova L.N., Tyumentseva E.Yu. Development of approaches to improving the efficiency of production processes for manufacturing products from fur semi-finished products. Design and technology. 2021;82(124):24-30.

9. Kostyakova Yu.V. The sale of foreign-made fur products subject to labeling: customs aspects. Financial economics. 2020;2:142-147.

10. Kochetkova N.G. On the marking of fur products with control (identification) signs. Science Alley. 2018;3(6(22)):556-562.

11. Markina A.S. Problems of labeling fur products in Russia and ways to solve them. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2023;2-1(77):224-227.

12. Mukhina V.S. Control identification mark (KEYES) of fur products. In the collection: Actual problems of branch legal science. Vladimir, 2020. pp. 95-100.