DOI: 10.33917/es-5.203.2025.44-51

The article examines options for recovery of the Russian economy, its civilizational role in relation to continuit y of the advanced thought and Russian society’s traditions, associated with moral purification, freedom and social justice, universally significant spiritual values, ideals of humanism and patriotism, characteristic of Russian economic life. It is proposed to consider consumer-value relations as an alternative paradigm of socio-economic development, which may well meet the requirements of a sovereign route, focusing on spiritual-moral foundations and values. The author notes that consumervalue relations take into account a historic unique character of the national economic system. Proposed methodological approach can serve as a starting point for the national liberation of modern Russia both from the shackles of capitalist orders and from injustice towards a human being.

References:

1. Dementyev V.V., Scherbakov A.P. Profit and Economic Growth. Terra economicus, 2017, vol. 15, no 3, pp. 75–91.

2. Makarova I.V. Sistema prioritetov razvitiya Rossii [The System of Priorities for the Development of Russia]. Nauchno-analiticheskiy zhurnal “Aktual’nye problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii”, 2014, no 1, pp. 57–60.

3. Dubrovskiy A.V. Razmyshleniya o strukturno-tekhnologicheskikh preobrazovaniyakh i liberal’nykh al’ternativakh ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii [Reflections on Structural and Technological Transformations and Liberal Alternatives for Economic Development in Russia]. Ekonomika ustoychivogo razvitiya, 2020, no 2(42), pp. 82–87.

4. Lenchuk E.B., Filatov V.I. Rossiyskaya ekonomika: poisk effektivnoy strategii [Russian Economy: Search for an Effective Strategy]. Mir novoy ekonomiki, 2018, pp. 6–21.

5. Putin V.V. Zasedanie diskussionnogo kluba “Valday” [Meeting of the Valdai Discussion Club]. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Prezidenta RF, available at: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/75521

6. Dubrovskiy A.V. Formirovanie sovremennoy paradigmy ustoychivogo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Formation of a Modern Paradigm of Sustainable Economic Development]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo, 2020, no 3(116), pp. 872–877.

7. Shcherbakov V.N., Dubrovskiy A.V. Diskussionnye problemy tsennosti i stoimosti v otsenke ekonomicheskikh effektov [Controversial Issues of Value and Cost in Assessing Economic Effects]. Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava, 2024, no 5-2, pp. 353–357.

8. Pososhkov I.T. Kniga o skudosti i bogatstve [A Book about Pover ty and Wealth]. Moscow, Ekonomicheskaya gazeta, 2011, 415 p.

9. Sorokin D.E. O sposobnosti Rossii k sotsial’noekonomicheskim transformatsiyam [On Russia’s Ability to Undergo Socio-economic Transformations]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, 2019, no 1(59), pp. 23–28.

10. Amzhrdzhanyants F., Sis’kov V., Gubanov S., Ivanova N. Potrebitel’no-stoimostnaya sistema sotsialisticheskogo khozyaystvovaniya i obespecheniya kachestva produktsii [Consumer-cost System of Socialist Management and Quality Assurance of Products]. Moscow, Izd-vo standartov, 1990, 240 p.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-5.179.2021.66-72

Team success at the Olympic Games is a combination of material, demographic and cultural factors with non-material factors — will, fighting spirit, passion, patriotism. Exactly the same combination of factors determines the ability of a state to wage a war. Therefore, military capabilities of the state (as well as economic and technological ones), according to the author, can be assessed by results at the Olympic Games.

DOI: 10.33917/es-3.169.2020.74-79

The article dwells on the changing role of Russia in Kyrgyzstan, identifies trends of the main country’s indicators in trade and direct investment, describes humanitarian cooperation between two countries. The authors make an assessment of Kyrgyzstan’s economic potential, examine the main industries and agriculture of the country, identify its investment attractiveness for foreign partners.