Author page: Mishin Yu.V.

Increasing the efficiency of using corporate information systems in production management (on the example of high-tech industries)

DOI: 10.33917/mic-4.111.2023.5-28

In modern conditions, prompt and reasonable adoption of important decisions on the regulation of production is impossible without automated calculations performed by modern software products. One of the ways to effectively solve this problem is to create a concept (taking into account the specific features of enterprises and organizations of the defense industry) of a corporate information system platform.

The paper considers and resolves the following issues: 1) on the basis of a comparative analysis of sales volumes of corporate information systems in the global and Russian markets, their main trends and patterns of development are identified; 2) a comparative assessment of the evolution of approaches to the creation and implementation of information systems, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as possible areas of the most effective use; 3) the priority requirements of potential users for corporate information systems are substantiated; 4) the main parameters are detailed – the characteristics of concentration, specialization, cooperation and combination of production; 5) the expediency of developing two variants of CIS platforms is substantiated: for a sub-sector (an integrated corporate structure) and for a group of enterprises producing homogeneous products; 6) proposals are made for organizing a complex of works in the defense industries to introduce advanced digital technologies to solve the problems of managing high-tech production.


1. Enterprise Resource Planning Market Size 2021. Revenue Growth Development, Business Opportunities, Future Trends, Top Key Players, Market Share and Global Analysis by Forecast to 2023. URL: and-global-analysis-by-forecast-to-2023-2021-07-22

2. Top 5 ERP software. Worldwide, 2018. Provider. URL:

3. ERP systems (world market). URL:

4. Top 10 ERP Software Vendors. Market Size and Market Forecast 2019-2024. URL:

5. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) software market revenues worldwide from 2019 to 2024. URL:

6. ERP Software Market Size. URL:

7. 75% of Dutch organizations uses an ERP system, CRM is less used. URL:

75% of Dutch organizations uses an ERP system, CRM is less used

8. Enterprise management systems (ERP). Russian market. URL:

9. Roan Alexander. SAP HANA and S/4HANA – a simple guide. URL:


Methods for building organizational management structures in defense industries

DOI: 10.33917/mic-6.107.2022.19-31

The purpose of this scientific article is to prepare proposals for the further development of the management of enterprises and organizations of the domestic defense industry. The relevance of the topic is due to the fact that at present the current organizational structure for managing them has a number of significant drawbacks, the main of which (especially with a significant expansion of the range of products) are a significant decrease in the system’s maneuverability and an increase in its response time to changes in external conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new methodological approaches to eliminate these shortcomings. The paper considers the following issues: 1) as a result of the analysis of integration processes in the Russian defense industry, the main shortcomings and unresolved problems were identified; 2) the fundamental conditions for the development of an organizational structure for managing a business entity are determined; 3) requirements for its elements are formulated; 4) proposed and substantiated on their basis a typical organizational structure for managing a large production facility – a corporation.



1. On the approval of the «Federal target program for the restructuring and conversion of the defense industry for 1996-2000». Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 625 dated June 24, 1998. – Access from the Garant information and legal system.

2. Artyukhov V.I. Conversion of the defense industry in modern economic conditions // Conversion in mechanical engineering. 1994;1:5-9. (In Russ.).

3. Borisov V., Rassadin V., Tarakanov G. Prospects for structural changes in mechanical engineering and military-industrial complex // Economist. 1995;7:45-50. (In Russ.).

4. Bratukhin A.G., Dmitriev O.N., Kovalkov Yu.A. conversion potential. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1992. 453 p.

5. Pimenov V.V. State corporations as a tool for implementing industrial policy in the military-industrial complex // Management and business administration. 2008;4:56-65. (In Russ.).

6. Sobolev L.B. Restructuring of the military-industrial complex //Finance and credit. 2016;47:47-62. (In Russ.).

7. Sobolev L.B. Horizontal integration or conglomeration? //Economic analysis. 2013;24:8-12. (In Russ.).

8. Barinov V.A. Organizational design. Moscow: Infra-M. 2012. 384 p.

9. Kozyr N.S., Natapova S.M. Classification of organizational structures of enterprise management // Economics and management of innovative technologies. 2015. №3. URL:

10. Moshkina T. Many-sided structure // Personnel management. 2007;12:63-69. (In Russ.).

11. Zhdanova L.A. Organization and management of a capitalist firm. M.: Publication of the Peoples’ Friendship University, 1987. 82 p.

12. Betelin V.B. On the problem of diversification of production at the enterprises of the military-industrial complex of Russia // Innovations. 2018;7:3-7. (In Russ.).

13. Biryukov A.V. Cluster policy as a factor in increasing the competitiveness of defense industry enterprises // Microeconomics. 2009;5:70-75. (In Russ.).

Using the Hierarchy Analysis Method in state strategic planning

DOI: 10.33917/mic-5.106.2022.5-25

The purpose of this work is to prepare proposals for the further development and practical use in the Russian Federation of the methodology and tools of program-targeted management. The following issues are resolved in the article: 1) as a result of the analysis of domestic and foreign scientific sources, as well as regulatory documents of the Russian Federation in the field of strategic planning, its main shortcomings are identified and the main directions for further development are formulated; 2) a methodical approach is proposed for the development of state programs for the economic and social development of the country based on the method of analysis of hierarchies; 3) an example of the practical use of this method for solving the problem of substantiating the optimal size of import substitution of foreign components for the production of a short-haul narrow-body passenger aircraft Super Jet 100 is given.



1. Indicative planning and implementation of regional policy / ed. A.B. Levinthal. M.: Finance and statistics, 2007. 326 p. (In Russ.).

2. Demidova L.G., Klimov S.M., Shcherbakovsky G.Z., Antonov A.G. Indicative planning: theory and ways of improvement. St. Petersburg: Knowledge, 2000. 230 p. (In Russ.).

3. Afonina I.A., Ivanova O.D., Panasevich O.E. About the conference “Strategic planning in the face of increasing external threats: the need to mobilize internal resources for the development of Russia” //Microeconomics. 2014;6:138-144. (In Russ.).

4. Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. Revival of planning, lessons (political and economic discourse // Problems of the theory of management practice. 2016;1:8-18. (In Russ.).

5. Buchwald E.M. Strategic unfinished construction; is the result visible? // STAGE. Economic theory, analysis, practice. 2017;6:33-47. (In Russ.).

6. Gaganov A.A. Does Russia have strategic planning? URL: http: rusrand. ru/analytics/est-li-v-rossii-strategicheskoe-planirovanie

7. Mishin Yu.V., Pisareva O.M., Mishin A.Yu., Alekseev V.A. Normative base of strategic planning: fundamentals, unresolved problems and directions of development. Monograph. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House, 2019. 404 p. (In Russ.).

8. Smirnova O.O. Paradigms and parallels. On the paradigm shift of a unipolar world in strategic planning // MIR (Modernization. Innovations. Development. 2014;3(19):107-110. (In Russ.).

9. Saaty T.L. Making decisions. Method of analysis of hierarchies. Moscow: Radio and communication, 1993. 241 p. (In Russ.).

10. Saaty T., Kerns K. Analytical planning. Organization of systems. M: Radio and communication, 1991. 224 p. (In Russ.).

11. Kartvelishvili V.M., Lebedyuk E.A. Hierarchy Analysis Method: Criteria and Practice. Bulletin of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2013;6:1-16. (In Russ.).

12. Romanov V.N. System analysis for engineers. St. Petersburg: SZGZTU, 2006. 186 p. (In Russ.).

13. Beshelev S.D., Gurvich F.G. Expert assessments. M.: Nauka, 1973. 158 p. (In Russ.).