DOI: 10.33917/mic-5.106.2022.50-61

This article discusses benchmarking as a continuous process of quality management and investment and innovation activities on the example of PJSC Severstal Corporation.

The definition of the concept of «benchmarking» is given, its purpose, tasks, stages of implementation are shown. A comparison of Russian and foreign approaches in benchmarking is presented.

The results of benchmarking are shown, which identified shortcomings and gave directions for improving the efficiency of PJSC Severstal. Companies need to bet more on R&D and get better results from it. In recent years, against the background of the pandemic and economic sanctions, PJSC Severstal faced a lack of funds for the modernization and reconstruction of production facilities, with a mismatch with the structure of supply and demand.

The authors propose to reduce costs, develop the metal products market and introduce innovative technologies.

References:

1. Al-Yavar A.A., Zharikov R.V., Bezpalov V.V. Improving the quality of products (services) of commercial organizations. Modern Economy Success. 2020;6:120-126. (In Russ).

2. Garipov A.S. The genesis of benchmarking in the time continuum. Bulletin of the Kazan State Financial and Economic Institute. 2007;4 (9):70-74. (In Russ.).

3. Devlet-Geldy G.K. Benchmarking as a tool for competitive development of modern enterprises. Problems of the economy. 2016;1 (71):42-46. (In Russ.).

4. Eroputova O.A. Analysis and evaluation of cash flows from investment operations of PJSC Severstal. The Scientific Heritage. 2022;86-3(86):17-20. (In Russ.).

5. Kozhemyako A.P. Benchmarking as a tool for analyzing target client groups. Quality management. 2020;4:314-322. (In Russ.).

6. May I. Knowledge management, production efficiency and benchmarking. Rationing and remuneration of labor in industry. 2010;7:52-55. (In Russ.).

7. Ostrovskaya V.N. Theory of SWOT analysis in competitive integration benchmarking. Economic sciences. 2008;47:64-67. (In Russ.).

8. Startseva M.V. The problem of using benchmarking in modern conditions. Economy and society. 2015;2-5(15):943-944. (In Russ.).

9. Silaeva A.V. Analysis of the financial results of the company’s activities on the example of PJSC Severstal for 2019-2021. A young scientist. 2022;23(418): 577-580. (In Russ.).

10. Tyupin N.A. Modern principles of benchmarking. Student. 2020:34-1(120):39-41. (In Russ.).

11. Chekeeva N.K. Benchmarking: conceptual apparatus. Bulletin of the Magistracy. 2017;12-3 (75):46-47. (In Russ.).

12. Shakirova N.N., Zhukovskaya S.L. Problems and possibilities of using financial benchmarking. Topical issues of the modern economy. 2022;4:609-616. (In Russ.).

13. Shuvarikov M.D. Principles of IFRS in the financial analysis of PJSC Severstal and PJSC NLMK. Economic security. 2021;4(3):839-852. (In Russ.).

14. Bezpalov V.V., Lochan S.A., Fedyunin D.V., Solopova N.A., Gorin D.S. Electric power industry development in the russian federation considering the structural trends of the world economy. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2021.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-4.105.2022.24-33

This article evaluates the financial potential and corporate asset management policy of RUSAL URAL JSC in the context of economic sanctions. It is established that RUSAL URAL JSC combines an aggressive policy of managing current assets and an aggressive type of policy of managing current liabilities. Thus, a comprehensive operational management policy can also be characterized as aggressive. JSC RUSAL URAL has low ratings for almost all components of the financial potential of the corporation (FPC), therefore, it can be assigned a low level of FPC. Thus, the corporation is not financially stable. In order to improve the financial position of the corporation, increase its stability and solvency, it is possible to change the policy of managing current liabilities from aggressive to moderate, i.e. reduce the share of short-term loans in the total amount of liabilities.

References:

1. Bezpalov V.V. The mechanism of restructuring the management system of an industrial enterprise. Publishing house: Knorus. Moscow, 2013. 169 p. (In Russ.).

2. Ksenofontova H.Z., Filatov V.V., Mishakov V.Yu., Nechaev B.P., Osinskaya T.V., Panov S.A. Transformation of the knowledge structure of managers of an industrial company – a source of development of their new competencies: a regional aspect. News of higher educational institutions. Technology of the textile industry. 2020;4(388):157-164. (In Russ.).

3. Filatov V.V., Dorofeev A.Yu., Deeva V.A., Knyazev V.V., Kobulov B.A., Kobiashvili N.A., Mukhina T.N., Palastina I.P., Rudenko O.E., Osinskaya T.V. Theoretical foundations of designing management systems of industrial enterprises in conditions of economic instability. Moscow, 2008. (In Russ.).

4. Filatov V.V., Alekseev A.E., Shlenov Yu.V., Vorobyev D.I., Dorofeev A.Yu., Dolgova V.N., Zhenzhebir V.N., Pshava T.S., Fadeev A.S., Fedorov B.K., Shestov A.V. Machine-building complex of the Russian Federation: sectoral, regional and strategic aspects of development. Kursk, 2017. (In Russ.).

5. Bobryshev A.D., Tumin V.M., Savelyev A.V., Alenina E.E., Trifonov V.A. The place of infrastructure in the innovative ecosystem of industry. In the collection: Achievements in the field of economics, business and management research (AEBMR). 2022. pp. 37-43.

6. Gumerov A.V., Mukhomorova I.V., Sadykova R.R., Fatihova L.E., Chikisheva N.M., Simonova L.M., Alenina E.E. The program “Client’s voice” as a tool for business structure innovation. Journal of Sustainable Development. 2015;8(3):263-270.

7. Kadyrova O.V., Polyanskaya O.A., Dymova O.O., Bespalova V.V., Okomina E.A. Methods of evaluating the effectiveness of the organization of maintenance and repair at the enterprise. In the collection: Achievements in Economics, Business and Management Studies (AEBMR). Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference «Russia 2020 – a new reality: Economy and Society». 2021. pp. 173-176.

8. Tatarenko V.N., Polyanskaya O.A., Shaitarova O.E., Tereshchenko S.V., Melentyeva N.I. Synergetics of subject-object interactions in the context of the digital paradigm. In the collection: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2. Ser. «II All-Russian Scientific and Technical Conference «Digital technologies in forestry». 2021. p. 012032.