The "Economic Strategies" journal

#2. 2025




Problems of global economic development in 2024–2026

According to the IMF, the US GDP growth rate in 2025 will decrease to 1,6% with the forecast for US GDP growth in 2024 being 2,1%. Our article [1] provides an analysis of «Black Monday» on August 5, 2024, which marked the beginning of the global financial crisis. In this article, we will outline the further course of this crisis. In Russia, GDP growth for the first half of 2024 was 4,6%, for 2024 – 4,1%. The forecast for real GDP for the world was 3,2% in 2024 and, according to the IMF, the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation gave a conservative scenario, according to which the growth of Russian GDP in 2025 will be 1,7%, inflation 3,7% (Kommersant, 09.14.2024, p. 19).

References:

1. Kuzovkin A.I., Stakun A.V. Forecast of the dynamics of global economic development for 2024–2025. Microeconomics. 2024;4:27–38.

Sustainability of the economic supersystem of Russia and Belarus under nuclear attack

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.121.2025.5-13

Approaches to ensuring the sustainability of the economic supersystem of Russia and Belarus in the event of a nuclear attack are formulated. The technology under consideration is proposed as an integral part of the infrastructural segment of the economic supersystem for work in the context of implementing complex special projects (operations) with the adoption of justified management decisions that fit into the boundaries of trust between the command center and the operational zone, focused on the priorities of the strategy for conducting the SVO.

References:

1. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L. The world community in conditions of supercritical bifurcation. Management of complex organizational and technical systems in conditions of supercritical situations: Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference, Moscow, April 21-22, 2022. Moscow: Institute of Economic Strategies, 2022. pp. 9-12.

2. Ageev A.I. The role of sanctions, conflicts and special operations: reflections on the future. Part 1. Scientific Bulletin of the defense-industrial complex of Russia. 2023;4:66-74.

3. Ageev A.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Russia in a supercritical situation: managing the restoration of life support functions to overcome the consequences of a natural macrodisaster. Economic strategies. 2021;23(5 (179)):28-35.

4. Makarov V.L., Ageev A.I., Bakhtizin A.R., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Modeling the Consequences of a Nuclear Strike. Economic Strategies. 2022;24(4 (184)):6-16.

5. Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. New Possibilities of Electromagnetic Pulse Attacks on Critical Infrastructure Facilities. Transformation of Modern Warfare: Proceedings of the III All-Russian Scientific Conference, Omsk, February 16, 2024. Omsk: Military Academy of Logistics named after General of the Army A.V. Khrulev, 2024. pp. 108-112.

6. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L. New Great War: Chronicles of a Well-Forgotten Future. Economic Strategies. 2014;16(6-7(122-123)):16-33.

7. Ageev A.I., Loginov E.L. Strategic Predetermination of Special Military Operations in the World Supersystem. Economic Strategies. 2023;25(4(190)):6-19.

8. Ageev A.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Implementation of Troop Command and Management of Civilian Facilities as a Single Hybrid Battlefield. Neurocomputers and Their Application: Abstracts of the XX All-Russian Scientific Conference, Moscow, March 22, 2022. Moscow: MGPPU, 2022. pp. 31-33.

9. Loginov E.L., Grabchak E.P., Epishkin I.I., Derkach A.K. Using quantum computing with the formation of a single computational space of ultra-large dimensions in the sphere of supplies of fuel and energy resources in the context of special period situations. Artificial societies. 2024;19(2).

10. Ageev A.I., Grabchak E.P., Loginov E.L. Using supercomputer technologies to manage the work of ultra-large organizational systems in the implementation of complex special projects (operations). Microeconomics. 2024;1:5-10.

11. Makarov V.L., Bakhtizin A.R., Loginov E.L. Application of Economic and Mathematical Methods and Models of Optimal Planning in the Digital Economy of the Future (Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences and Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Prognostic Interpretation and Development of the Scientific Heritage of Nobel Laureates L.V. Kantorovich and V.V. Leontiev). Moscow: Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2022. 248 p.

State and prospects of scientific and technical co-operation and development of the EAEU

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.121.2025.14-23

Globalisation, accompanied by the industrial leadership of «developed countries», is being replaced by regionalisation, which is built on conditions of equality and cooperation in common interests. The EU and the Eurasian Economic Union are illustrative examples of the international organisation of regional economic integration. In the context of changes in the architecture of the global technological system, the EAEU faces the task of deepening scientific and technical co-operation. On the agenda is the issue of reducing the level of import dependence in a number of types of finished products, the solution to these issues is associated with the involvement of research base: Eurasian technology platforms, the work of which is aimed at consolidating the scientific potential of the EAEU countries on the way to achieving technological sovereignty. The article analyses the organisation of scientific and technical cooperation in the EU in order to use this experience to solve problems and justify the prospects of scientific and technical cooperation and industrial cooperation within the EAEU.

References:

1. Decision of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council of 11.12.2020 No. 12: Strategic Directions for the Development of Eurasian Economic Integration until 2025. Effective date: 12.01.2021.

2. Platonova I.N. et al. International Economic Relations in the Global Economy: textbook for universities. Moscow: Yurait, 2023. 528 p.

3. Smitienko B.M. et al. World Economy in 2 Parts. Part 1: textbook for universities / edited by B.M. Smitienko, N.V. Lukyanovich. – 4th ed., revised. and additional. Moscow: Yurait, 2023. 216 p.

4. Ignatova O.V., Orlova N.L., Gorbunova O.A., Ason T.A. Global Economy and International Economic Relations. Workshop: Textbook for Universities / edited by O.V. Ignatova. Moscow: Yurait, 2023. 212 p.

5. Glazyev S.Yu. Problems of Development of Eurasian Economic Integration: How to Resolve Them? Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2022; 3 (41). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-razvitiya-evraziyskoy-ekonomicheskoy-integratsii-kak-ih-razreshit

6. Glazyev S.Yu. On Strategic Directions of Development of the EAEU. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2020;1 (31). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-strategicheskih-napravleniyah-razvitiya-eaes

7. Glazyev S.Yu. EAEU – EU: Prospects for a Comprehensive Economic Agreement. Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics. 2019;4 (30). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/eaes-es-perspektivy-vseobemlyuschego-ekonomicheskogo-soglasheniya

8. Glazyev S.Yu., Tkachuk S.P. On the Parameters of Economic Development in the EAEU until 2035. International Trade and Trade Policy. 2023;9(1):90–112.

9. Federal State Statistics Service. URL: https://www.gks.ru/

System of sources of intellectual property rights as a key tool for protecting intellectual property and stimulating innovation and the development of the global economy

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.121.2025.24-39

This article examines the methodological aspects of the formation of a system of sources of intellectual property (IP) law as a key tool for protecting intellectual property and stimulating innovation in modern conditions.

It is determined that the practice of the economic judicial Board of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in trademark protection cases should be improved, including with regard to formal requirements for the preparation and consideration of court cases. It is shown that in modern legal practice, trademarks are considered only as legal instruments with which copyright holders have the right to prevent the production and sale of identical or confusingly similar products by opponents. The use of existing means to protect the interests of copyright holders within the framework of the “fuzzy” concept of trademarks allows all business entities and authorities to take a fresh look at trademarks: not only as a legal instrument, but also as an organizational and economic instrument. Intellectual property, as an intangible asset with commercial value, like any object of copyright ownership, can be seriously affected by the actions of third parties. Such damage must be compensated by the copyright holder in court. Thus, violators may be held civilly or criminally liable for the illegal use of such trademarks or service marks. The trademark owner has the right to demand compensation for damages and has the right to publish the court’s decision in the mass media. It should also be noted that trademarks and service marks are a means of personalizing goods and their manufacturers. Trademarks and service marks have different concepts, functions, and types. The legislation of the Russian Federation provides for civil or criminal liability for illegal use. It is shown that the system of sources of intellectual property rights is complex and multilevel.

References:

1. Andrievskaya A.N., Kostornov D.A. Sound trademarks in the system of non-traditional trademarks. Law and management. 2024;12:213-215.

2. Biyukov E. On the issue of the term «trademark use» in relation to the ways of using a trademark on the Internet.  In: Legal Protection of Intellectual property: problems of theory and practice. 2020. pp. 311-317.

3. Bondar I.V. Regulation of the process of using trademarks and termination of legal protection of a trademark. In the collection: Legal problems of the organization of intellectual activity in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2021. pp. 9-13.

4. Bochkova D.K. The possibility of trademark registration in the name of several persons, with the exception of registration of a collective trademark. Colloquium Is A Journal. 2020;4-7 (56):75-77.

5. Burchik S.S. Intellectual property as an intangible asset in the discussion on the abolition of antimonopoly intellectual property immunities in the Russian Federation. Theory and practice of modern science. 2020;7 (61):53-80.