DOI: 10.33917/es-6.204.2025.50-55

The article examines the role of digital factors in enhancing labor productivity as one of the key elements of technological and economic development. Using the example of the Kyrgyz Republic, it demonstrates that the implementation of digital technologies and the development of digital infrastructure contribute to improving efficiency; however, without the simultaneous modernization of fixed assets and the training of qualified personnel, the effect of digitalization remains limited. The article also proposes the creation of an integrated model of digital factors influencing labor productivity at the macro, meso, and micro levels, which would enable a more comprehensive assessment and management of digital transformation processes.

References:

1. Telyatnikova T.V., Kipervar E.A., Trunkina L.V. Vyyavlenie faktorov, vliyayushchikh na uroven’ proizvoditel’nosti truda, kak osnova formirovaniya ustoychivogo razvitiya predpriyatiya [Identifying Factors Influencing Labor Productivity as a Basis for the Formation of Sustainable Enterprise Development]. Ekonomika truda, 2024, vol. 11, no 3, pp. 361–374, DOI 10.18334/et.11.3.120672

2. Mkrtychan Z.V. Klassifikatsiya faktorov, okazyvayushchikh vliyanie na proizvoditel’nost’ truda [Classification of Factors Influencing Labor Productivity]. Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola, 2020, no 3(139), pp. 23–30.

3. Kontseptsiya tsifrovoy transformatsii Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki na 2024–2028 gody [Concept of Digital Transformation of the Kyrgyz Republic for 2024– 2028]. Ministerstvo yustitsii KR, available at: https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/30-164/edition/6414/ru?ysclid=mgi8iwipwl116850581

4. Tsifrovoy kodeks Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki ot 31 iyulya 2025 g. N 178 [Digital Code of the Kyrgyz Republic of July 31, 2025, No. 178]. Ministerstvo yustitsii KR, available at: https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/3-48/edition/35412/ru

5. Rasporyazhenie Kabineta ministrov KR ot 23 iyulya 2024 g. N 4 [Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Kyrgyz Republic dated July 23, 2024 No. 4]. Ministerstvo yustitsii KR, available at: https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/57-19271/edition/14721/ru?ysclid=mgjn8uo4yg604258729

6. Indeks razvitiya elektronnogo pravitel’stva (srednevzveshennyy): Kirgiziya: Po dannym OON [E-Government Development Index (weighted average): Kyrgyzstan: According to UN data]. Statbase, available at: https://statbase.ru/data/kgz-e-government-development-index/

7. Tsifrovizatsiya v Kyrgyzstane: byudzhet v 600 mln somov na 2024 god [Digitalization in Kyrgyzstan: A 600 Million Som Budget for 2024]. News KG, available at: https://news.kg/2024/04/03/cifrovizacija-v-kyrgyzstane-bjudzhet-v-600/

8. Kyrgyzstan v tsifrakh — 2025: Natsional’nyy statisticheskiy komitet [Kyrgyzstan in Figures — 2025: National Statistical Committee], available at: https:// stat.gov.kg/media/publicationarchive/4943edd9-da6d-4075-88f9-8b667e64c8cb.pdf

9. Brovko N.A., Borisenko N.A. Ekonomicheskiy rost v Kyrgyzskoy Respublike cherez prizmu proizvoditel’nosti truda [Economic Growth in the Kyrgyz Republic through the Prism of Labor Productivity]. Ufimskiy gumanitarnyy nauchnyy forum, 2023, no 4(16), pp. 40–55.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-4.123.2025.26-33

Personnel management in modern Russia is characterized by the fact that a new national project «Personnel» has been formed, the education system is being restructured, which is designed to provide the country’s economy with the necessary qualified labor resources. However, general conceptual approaches should be provided with an effective implementation mechanism, clear criteria for the success or failure of the implementation of personnel policy. In this regard, there is a need to form a mechanism for assessing the effectiveness of personnel management.

The relevance of this work is due to the fact that in Russia the issue of increasing labor productivity is particularly acute, since it significantly lags behind the indicators of competing countries. This study is aimed at analyzing foreign and domestic experience in human resource management, identifying the main development trends and comparing them.

References: 

1. Labor productivity: methods of analysis and forecasting / I.I. Borshchevsky, V.A. Trukhov. Ed. by A.A. Rakov. Academy of Sciences of the BSSR, Institute of Economics. Minsk: Science and Technology, 1988. 140 p.

2. GDP per person employed (constant 2021 PPP $). The World Bank. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/

3. World Digital Competitiveness Ranking. IMD World Competitiveness Center. URL: https://www.imd.org/centers/wcc/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-digital-competitiveness-ranking/

4. List of Countries by Human Development Index // World Population Review. URL: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/

5. Kokuytseva T.V. Methodological approaches to human resource management of the company in the context of digital transformation and building effective business processes. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Economics. 2024; 26(1):82–93.

6. Top Business Practices to Increase Talent Availability Within Companies Worldwide in 2023. Statista. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1387849/

7. How L&D Tracks Business Impact Worldwide. Statista. URL: http://www.statista.com/statistics/1472187/

8. Transformation of human capital and competencies into the intellectual property of the organization / S.V. Nazyuta, A.A. Chursin. Moscow: Innovative engineering, 2021. 261 p.

9. Kruglov D.V. Digitalization of HR Management: a textbook for universities / D.V. Kruglov, O.S. Reznikova, I.V. Tsygankova. Moscow: Yurait Publishing House, 2025. 102 p. (Higher education). Text: electronic. Educational platform Yurait [website]. URL: https://urait.ru/bcode/568568

10. HR Tech. Statista. URL: https://www.statista.com/study/85007/hr-tech/

11. Fanin R.V. Modern trends in HR management. Economy and business: theory and practice. 2024;8(114). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-tendentsii-upravleniya-personalom

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.187.2023.26-35

Technological changes form the basis of modern economic development, however, in order to study their influence and features, as well as to develop control actions, it is necessary to adequately measure the level of technological effectiveness of the economy. The purpose of the study is to identify the limitations of existing approaches and methods for measuring technological development, indicating what prospects there are in terms of their improvement or the development of new ways to assess the level of manufacturability and emerging technologies. The methodology is based on the economic theory of technological development, statistical approaches to measuring the level of technological effectiveness of the economy, performance assessment, and comparative analysis is applied. The result is reduced to a reasonable position that the existing methods for measuring the level of manufacturability essentially do not reveal the true content of this concept, do not reflect the manufacturability of the economy. Thus, it is required to revise and introduce new accounting, measurement and statistical procedures covering the issues of technological development. The measuring apparatus for technological modes, the “knowledge economy” also requires perfection, which is proposed in this study.

By modes, it is important to measure the distribution of policy instruments and the structure of technologies in each mode, for which accounting for specific types of technologies and the construction of technological maps can be used. The “knowledge economy”, which symbolizes a high level of technological development, needs to be measured in its purest form by the volume of sectors responsible for the creation, transfer, replication and application of advanced knowledge. Evaluation of productive jobs needs to be revised — from measuring wages in the workplace, as it is today, to measuring the level of its automation and intellectualization.

References:

1. Glaz’ev S.Yu. Teoriya dolgosrochnogo tekhniko-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Theory of Long-term Technical and Economic Development]. Moscow, Vladar, 1993, 310 p.

2. Peres K. Tekhnologicheskie revolyutsii i finansovyi kapital. Dinamika puzyrei i periodov protsvetaniya [Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. Dynamics of Bubbles and Periods of Prosperity]. Moscow, Delo, 2011, 232 p.

3. Sukharev O.S. Ekonomika tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya [Economics of Technological Developmen]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika, 2008, 480 p.

4. Khelpman E. Zagadka ekonomicheskogo rosta [The Mystery of Economic Growth]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo instituta Gaidara, 2011, 240 p.

5. Shumpeter I.A. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya [Theory of Economic Development. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2007, 864 p.

6. Antonelli C., Gehringer А. Technological change, rent and income inequalities: A Schumpeterian approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2017, vol. 115, pp. 85–98.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-5.179.2021.78-95

The article provides examples of introducing advanced management practices at Russian enterprises, and also describes the experience of highly skilled managers with an adequate to market realities mentality. According to the author, by actively mastering the three “whales” — management, mentality and business culture — we increase labor productivity, and therefore we have every reason to increase the workers’ wages, which are unacceptably low today.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-4.178.2021.92-103

The article provides examples of introducing advanced management practices at Russian enterprises, and also describes the experience of highly skilled managers with an adequate to market realities mentality. According to the author, by actively mastering the three “whales” — management, mentality and business culture — we increase labor productivity, and therefore we have every reason to increase the workers’ wages, which are unacceptably low today