DOI: 10.33917/mic-5.124.2025.94-102

The article purpose is to argue the need for interaction between the corporate goal and the process of corporate goal-setting in large corporations. The non-linear nature of the hierarchical structure of goals and the multi-purpose nature of corporate socio-economic systems in construction are substantiated. We formulated a number of basic methodological principles of hierarchical multi-purpose socio-economic systems goalsetting. There are carried out the classification of the corporate system goals in upper levels of the hierarchical construction corporate target structure. The results of the exploration showed that the corporate goals structure for socio-economic systems in construction should be basis on the principles of hierarchy, consistency of functional and target structures, multi-purpose nature, completeness and independence of a set of goals, and their dynamism.

References:

1. Voloshin A.V. Trends, challenges and threats of global transformation in the development of the socio-economic system. Economics and Innovation Management. 2023;1(24):34–49.

2. L’von Bertalanffy. General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller, lnc., 1968. 289 p.

3. Zhukov V.I., Larionov I.K., Gerasin A.N. Economic systems: state and market: monograph. Moscow: Dashkov i K°, 2019. 858 p.

4. Kleiner G.B. Systems Economy: Steps of Development: monograph. M.: Scientific Library, 2021. 745 p.

5. Cherkasskaya G.V. Socio-economic systems: essence and problems of researches. Bulletin of Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin? 2009. No.3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialno-ekonomicheskie-sistemy-suschnost-i-problemy-issledovaniy

6. Fedoseev I.V., Yudenko M.N. Prospects for the development of corporate social responsibility in the construction business. Microeconomics. 2025;3:77–85. DOI: 10.33917/mic-3.122.2025.77-85

7. Dilek Ulutaş Duman, Heyecan Giritli, Peter McDermott. Corporate social responsibility in construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management. 2016;6(2):218–231.

8. Udaltsova N.L., Shcherbinina P.L. Business social responsibility: implementation and impact on company management. Leadership and Management. 2024;11(1):265–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/lim.11.1.120325

9. Glazyev S.Yu. Strategic planning as an integrative element in the development management system. Economic revival of Russia. 2021;3 (69):14–19.

10. Makarov D.A., Yudenko M.N. System modeling of economic interaction of participants in the sphere of housing construction. Construction Economics. 2021;2(68):28–38.

11. Makarov D.A., Yudenko M.N. Financial mechanism for sustainable development of housing construction. Bulletin of the Volga State Technological University. Series: Economics and Management. 2024;4(63):53–64. DOI: 10.25686/2306-2800.2024.4.53

Заголовок: Multi-purpose nature of corporate socio-economic systems in construction
Авторы: Makarov D.A., Yudenko M.N.
Рубрика: MANAGEMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS
Ключевые слова: corporate systems, multi-purpose systems, hierarchy of goals, principles of goal-setting, corporate goal

DOI: 10.33917/mic-5.112.2023.48-56

The concept of sustainable development of a construction organization has been formulated. There is proposed an approach to solving issues of strategic planning and management based on a systems analysis of the relationship between sustainable development, financial potential and financial inclusion. The authors’ vision implies that financial potential is defined as a dynamic characteristic that determines the qualitative and quantitative assessment of a construction organization in terms of volumes, attractiveness and risks of investment. There are substantiated the necessity of consideration and methods for assessing financial inclusion at the corporate level.

References: 

1. Shuklov L.V. Enterprise Development Management. M.: «LIBROCOM», 2012. 200p.
2. R. Nelson S. Winter. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. М.: «Delo», 2002. 536 p.
3. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (chaired by Gro Harlen Brundtland) «Our Common Future». URL: https://www.un.org/ru/ga/pdf/brundtland.pdf
4. Babkina L.N., Skotarenko O.V. Economic sustainability of processes in the Russia Arctic regions. Microeconomics. 2023;2:82–92. (In Russ.).
5. Bachurinskaya I.A., Yudenko M.N. Sustainable Development of Housing Construction in Russia: Problems and Prospects // Topical issues of the development of modern science: theory and practice. Scientific session of the teaching staff, researchers and graduate students on the results of research for 2019. SPb.: St. Petersburg State University of Economics, 2020. pp. 6-9.
6. Chepachenko N.V., Yudenko M.N, Palicki Slavomir. Methodological aspects of research, measurement and evaluation of the development potential of construction organizations. Problems of Siberia socio-economic development. 2018;3(33):82–91. (In Russ.).
7. Research of a potential for construction organizations growth and development in the real estate market: monograph // I.V. Fedoseev, M.N. Yudenko, N.V. Chepachenko, W.B. Waldemar, A.A. Salov, S.A. Nikolikhina, N.A. Polovnikova / Under the edit. I.V. Fedoseev. SPb.: St. Petersburg State University of Economics, 2018. 103 с.
8. Jay Barney. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 1991;17(1):99-120.
9. Makarov D.A., Fedoseev I.V. Financial potential of Russia construction complex: concept, analysis and ways to increasing / Construction Complex: Economics, Management, Investments: Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Vol. 16. / Edit.: I.V. Fedoseev [and other]. SPb.: St. Petersburg State University of Economics, 2022. pp.5-12. (In Russ.).
10. Raghuram G. Rajan, Luigi Zingales. Financial dependence and growth. NBER, Working Paper 5758. Cambridge, MA 02138. September 1996.