DOI: 10.33917/mic-6.125.2025.64-77

This article examines the evolution of views on the scientific organization of labor and trends in the development of modern management ontologies and manager values in modern socio-economic conditions. This paper examines the achievements of Soviet theorists and practitioners of the first period, namely A.K. Gastev, P.M. Kerzhentsev, A.A. Bogdanov, who were the forerunners of modern automation and digitalization of production. The paper shows that among foreign management theorists such as F. Taylor, M. Weber, H. Fayol, H. Gant, H. Ford, P. Drucker and others, great attention was also paid to the scientific organization of work. In particular, Bogdanov’s developments have found practical application in the West in the development of network planning methods. The paper shows that the ideas of A.K. Gastev, P.M. Kerzhentsev, A.A. Bogdanov are still relevant in many ways, for example, on standardization of products, on working conditions, on the rational use of employee and supervisor time. The paper shows that it is the area related to the use of analytical objects that is a promising area of research for modern management. Artificial subjectivity will be the subject of consideration by management schools of the future. It is shown that attention in management theory will shift towards discussing management ontologies and manager values. The relations concern both management itself and managed objects – enterprises, branches of the national economy, the interrelation of industries within the country, the interrelation of industry and the spheres of education, culture, and economics. Moreover, the methods of developing ontologies will not be empirical, but will be deduced theoretically. This is what will inevitably determine a qualitative leap in management theory, and then in the practice of Russian management.

References:

1. Anisimov O.S. 100 shem. OOO Veliky Novgorod Pechatny Dvor, 2013, 156 p.

2. Anisimov O.S. The subjective space in game modeling is the world of psychology. 2015;3 (83):174–182.

3. Bulanova M.B. Gastev Alexey Kapitonovich. In the collection: Sociology of Russia in faces: history and modernity. The encyclopedic edition. Moscow, 2019. pp. 130–131.

4. Bulanova M.B. N. A.K. Gastev and P.M. Kerzhentsev: the experience of reconstructing ideas about the organization of labor. In the collection: IV Gastev readings. Moscow, 2022. pp. 26–31.

5. Verna V.V., Darchich A.V. The culture of working time management: P.M. Kerzhentsev’s contribution to the theory of domestic time management. Tavrichesky studios. 2024;39:9–13.

6. Golubkina T.M., Kulygin I.V. The concept of time management by A.K. Gastev. Economics and entrepreneurship. 2024;2 (163):1034–1036.

7. Elina A.M. Kerzhentsev P.M. on problems of management, theory of organizational activity and scientific organization of labor. In the book: Labor Economics and Ergonomics: theory and Practice. Tambov, 2023. pp. 152–169.

8. Ivankova M.E., Pyagai E.S. Alexey Kapitonovich Gastev. The idea of «social engineering», its relevance in modern organizations. In the collection: Young researcher: challenges and prospects. Moscow, 2024. pp. 232–234.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-6.125.2025.21-34

This article examines the relationship between agile technology and the classical management cycle in the methodology of the system-activity approach in modern socio-economic conditions. If you study the description of the Agile methodology in various sources and publications, you can see the general requirements for the organization of work during the project implementation process, but there is a lack of a rigid technological form of management according to this methodology. In the absence of such information, it is difficult to be sure that there are no «gaps», and the probability of defects is high if it is not possible to accurately identify the person responsible for the area where the defect occurred. In order to solve this problem, this article attempts to compare Agile methodology with the classical technological cycle of management activities. The paper shows that project management using the method of correlating Agile project management technology with the technological cycle of management activities will make project management organized, on the one hand, and ensure optimal tracking of «nuances» and «details», using the advantages of classical project management and Agile technology, while maximizing their weaknesses. the parties. Agile does not replace the technological management cycle, but complements it where flexibility is needed.

References:

1. Anisimov O.S. 100 shem. OOO Veliky Novgorod Pechatny Dvor, 2013, 156 p.

2. Anisimov O.S. Managerial decision-making. Meteorology and technology. M.: Rosako APK, 2002. 436 p.i.; 22.

3. Anes V., Abreu A., Diaz A., Kalado J. The Agile team assignment model for agile scaling. Informatics Procedia. 2023;219:1634–1641.

4. Beat K. Flexible by accident: how to apply flexible principles in academic research projects. SN Social Sciences. 2024;4(1):2.

5. Das S., Panda M., Rekha Sahu S., Patnaik D. Flexible change management: adaptation of flexible methodologies to enhance the sustainability of the organization. Journal of Research in the Field of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2023;6:41–52.

6. De Abreu J.N.F., Casagrande D.J. Lean manufacturing: combining a flexible approach with the philosophy of lean manufacturing and organizational efficiency. Revista Sistematica. 2024;14(6):1442–1453.

7. Excel in Chukvura. Flexible privacy in practice: integration of CCPA and GDPR within flexible frameworks in the US technology arena. International Journal of Scientific Research Updates. 2024;7(2):024–036.

8. Findsrud R. Flexible approach to innovation in the service sector: creating valuable innovations in the service sector with flexible integration of resources. The journal of value Creation. 2020;6(2):190–207.

9. Helmlinger P. Flexible transformation: a case study at an early stage of flexible implementation. Our economy. 2023;69(1):56–67.

10. Neuman M., Kuchel T., Ph.D. Diebold, Schenn E.M. Collision with flexible culture: identification of problems in the development of flexible thinking in organizations. Computer Science and information systems. 2024;21(3):1013–1031.