Author page: Anishchenko V.N.

Non-transitivity of institutional preferences of macroeconomic policy as a specific source of threats to Russia’s economic security

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.127.2026.98-111

The mechanism of cyclical interaction of institutions of budgetary, tax and monetary policy is revealed, as a result of which there is an initially unpredictable misalignment between formally logical decisions of individual regulators obtained within the framework of the traditional axiom of transitivity as a key criterion of rationality of actions. The emergence of these cycles, known as «institutional traps», is due to the objective non-transitivity of external and internal preference or superiority relationships between the institutions and their elements. The essence of «institutional traps» is that improving the performance of one institution can lead to a negative impact on the performance of another institution, and vice versa. Such «institutional traps» can create initially unpredictable threats to a country’s economic security, reducing the effectiveness of public administration. The article presents a theoretical model of the non-transitivity of preference relations between institutions of macroeconomic regulation, and identifies ways to reduce the level of risks associated with the negative manifestation of the non-transitivity of these relations.

References:

1. Anishchenko E.V. Theory and methodology of sustainability of ensuring economic security of the subjects of the Russian Federation, dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Economics: specialty 08.00.05. — Moscow: Kikot Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, 2020. 469 p.

2. Poddyakov A.N. The non-transitivity of superiority and its use for deception and training of thinking. Psychological and economic research. 2016;3(9):43-50.

3. Muntiyan V.I. Challenges and threats to Russia’s economic security in conditions of uncertainty / Economic security of the country, regions, organizations of various types of activity: proceedings of the V All-Russian Forum. Tyumen: TSU-Press, 2024. pp. 108-122.

4. Milovidov V.D. The trap of narratives: the influence of scientific hypotheses on the effectiveness of economic policy. Economic issues. 2025;9:126-141.

5. Chebotarev S.S., Anishchenko A.V. Institutional problems of the implementation of the strategy of economic security of Russia. On guard of the economy. 2021;1:85-97.

6. Yanushkina Yu.I. The correlation of the concepts of economic security and financial security in the modern scientific concept in ensuring the state security of the Russian Federation. Problems of economics and legal practice. 2025;21(3):239-245.

7. Polterovich V.M. Institutional traps and economic reforms. Economics and mathematical methods. 1999;35(2):3-40.

8. Proskurnova K.Y. Issues of spatial development of Russian regions. Public administration. Electronic bulletin. 2022;92:116-128.

9. Bragin V. Expert named the “three paradoxes” of the Russian economy. RBK. 2025. February 18. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/economics/18/02/2025/67b46bac9a7947d7bac8d27b

10. Balatskiy E.V. «Institutional trap»: a scientific term and a beautiful metaphor. Journal of Institutional Research. 2020;12(3):24-41.

The state Russian language in the political and legal mechanism for ensuring the security of the Russian Federation

DOI: 10.33917/mic-3.116.2024.90-98

The paper examines the role, place and importance of the state Russian language in the political and legal mechanism of ensuring the security of the Russian Federation. Russia is mainly focused on the problem of the implementation in practice of the policy of the Russian Federation in the field of the state Russian language and the need to take effective measures to neutralize the mechanism of destruction of the Russian language.

References:

1. Anishchenko V.N. On the modern theory and methodology of the study of the country’s security problems. Bulletin of the Academy of Economic Security of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2009;4:8-12. (In Russ.).

2. Ginzburg V. Emergency of emergency scale. RBC, 2008. The final issue.

3. Dvornikov V.A. Economic security – theory and reality of threats. M.: Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Social Sciences, 2000.

4. Doronin A.I. Business intelligence. 5th ed., reprint. and additional. M.: Axis-89, 2010. 704 p.

5. The draft law on the restriction of the use of foreign words in the public sphere. URL: https://tass.ru /

6. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 07/02/2021 No. 400 «On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation». URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru

7. Federal Law No. 52-FZ dated February 28, 2023 «On Amendments to the Federal Law “On the State Language of the Russian Federation”». URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru

8. Federal Law No. 53-FZ of June 1, 2005 «On the State Language of the Russian Federation» (Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2005, No. 23, Article 2199; 2013, No. 27, Article 3477; 2014, No. 19, Article 2306).

9. Hammer L. Large Nuclear Collider. RBC, 2008. The final issue.