DOI: 10.33917/mic-1.126.2025.27-41

The article analyzes China’s model for achieving technological sovereignty, traces its historical evolution, describes its institutional system, outlines the key state governance tools used in this process, and provides concrete examples of outcomes achieved. Understanding China’s experience in achieving technological sovereignty through instruments and mechanisms of strategic state governance is of great relevance for implementing similar Russian plans and aligning the EAEU with China’s global Belt and Road Initiative. The scientific novelty of the study lies in identifying the institutional mechanism of the guided transition to a new technological paradigm using China as a case study, as well as in systematizing the tools of strategic state governance that enable the reproduction of technological sovereignty. The methodological basis of the study is an institutional evolutionary analysis within the framework of technological paradigm shift theory.

References:

1. Glazyev S.Yu. Managing Economic Development: A Lecture Course. 2019. 759 p.

2. Arrighi G. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. L.: Verso, 1994.

3. Glazyev S.Yu. The Last World War. The USA Starts and Loses. Knizhnny Mir, 2016. (Izborsky Club Collection).

4. Gallagher K.S. The Globalization of Clean Energy Technology: Lessons from China. The MIT Press, 2019.

5. Liu X. Cheng P. National Strategy of Indigenous Innovation and its Implication to China. URL: (PDF) National Strategy of Indigenous Innovation and its Implications to China

6. 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要 URL: https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2006/content_240244.htm

7. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2015, May 19). «Made in China 2025» (《中国制造2025》). Retrieved from the official website of the Central Government of the People’s Republic of China. URL: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-05/19/content_9784.htm

8. 国家集成电路产业投资基金 URL：https://baike.baidu.com/item/国家集成电路产业投资基金/15891498

9. 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要 URL: https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2006/content_240244.htm

10. Physics Today. (n.d.). China’s 15-year science and technology plan. URL: https://physicstoday.aip.org/features/chinas-15-year-science-and-technology-plan

11. U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC). China’s Indigenous Innovation Policy. 2011. URL: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/5.4.11Wolff.pdf

12. Stanford Digital China Lab. (n.d.). Lexicon: Indigenous Innovation or Independent Innovation (自主创新, Zìzhǔ Chuàngxīn). URL: https://digichina.stanford.edu/work/lexicon-indigenous-innovation-or-independent-innovation-zizhu-chuangxin/

13. Li X., Liu Y. China’s innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory. Research Policy. 2011;40(7):917-931. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733311000709

DOI: 10.33917/es-1.167.2020.18-23

On February 22-24, 2019 in the village of Kulikovka, the Perm Territory, on the basis of JSC Perm Scientific Industrial Instrument-Making Company a strategic session aimed at formation of the “Photonics” cluster was held. As a basic concept for the session, the concept of a complete technology package was chosen. As the format of the event was used the format “Strategic Expert Community Ust-Kachka (UK)”, positioned by a number of experts as a new-generation thought factory. The expert pool included leading specialists of the PNPPK, providing operation of the territorial innovation and industrial cluster “Photonics”, representatives of the leading Russian scientific institutions in the field of photonics, representatives of federal authorities responsible for forming sectoral and cluster policies in the Russian Federation, corporate and banking community (VEB), as well as synthetic experts (CC system specialists).