On the methodology of subject-oriented management of industrial enterprise processes

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.121.2025.57-69

The subject under observation is the methodology of subject-oriented process management of industrial enterprises as an alternative to traditional approaches. The study highlights the need to adapt management techniques to the high dynamism and uncertainty of the market environment, especially in the context of the Russian economy. The analysis of the structure of subject-oriented management is carried out, which is based on the interaction of several levels of management: from meta-guidelines to specific practical tools. Among the key advantages of the methodology are the ability to quickly test hypotheses, reduce «shadow» functions, automate processes, and create an up-to-date management model with minimal costs. The technique demonstrates a high potential for overcoming modern industrial challenges, such as increasing digitalization, adapting to changing market conditions and staff shortages, which makes this technique particularly relevant for Russian industrial companies.

References:

 1. Behrens J. Agile Konzepte в Prozessmanagement FH Vorarlberg, 2022. 114 с.

2. Ageev A.I. The role of sanctions, conflicts and special operations: reflections on the future. Part 2. Scientific Bulletin of the Russian Military-industrial Complex. 2024;1:33-42.

3. Abramov V.I. Technological sovereignty: basic principles and strategic goals / V. I. Abramov, A.V. Gavrilyuk, A.V. Putilov. Management of economics, systems, processes: Collection of articles of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference, Penza, October 14-15, 2024.  Penza: Penza State Agrarian University, 2024. pp. 11-18.

4. Plotnikov V.A. Anti-crisis management of enterprises in the context of political and economic turbulence / V. A. Plotnikov, N. A. Ushakov. The Russian economy in the context of structural transformation: Proceedings of the II All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Novokuznetsk, May 28, 2024. Moscow: LLC «Topicality.RF», 2024. pp. 130-135.

5. Churkin D.A., Abramov V.I. Subject-oriented business process management as a tool for innovative enterprise development. Economic strategies. 2024;4(196): 128-135.

6. Weber S. Institutes of decision-making / S. Weber, D.V. Davydov, A.V. Savvateev. Questions of economics. 2017;6:45-57. DOI 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-6-45-57.

7. Fleischmann A., Schmidt W. S-BPM as a new impetus in Business Process Management: A survey. Business Informatics. 2015;2 (32):7-19.

8. Abramov V.I. The role of effective communications and collective intelligence in the digital transformation of a company / V. I. Abramov, D. A. Churkin. Bulletin of the University. 2024;4:50-60. DOI 10.26425/1816-4277-2024-4-50-60.

9. Lepsky V.E. Reflexivity in the management of social systems (philosophical and methodological analysis). Philosophy of Science and Technology. 2021; 26(2):127-147. DOI 10.21146/2413-9084-2021-26-2-127-147.

10. Wittikh V.A. The evolution of ideas for organizing management processes in society: from cybernetics to evergetics. Management issues in the development of the primary health care system: topical issues of hematology: collection of scientific papers of the scientific and practical conference, Samara, April 04, 2017.  Samara: Samara State Medical University, 2017. pp. 56-62.

11. Moiseeva T.V. Methodological foundations of decision support for the management of innovative development of sociotechnical facilities based on an intersubjective approach: dissertation … Doctor of Technical Sciences: 2.3.4. Ufa State Aviation Technical University.  Samara, 2022. 359 p.

12. Al-Fedaghi S. Conceptual Modeling of Actions. 2022. URL: https://hal.science/hal-03706613/document

13. Churkin D.A., Abramov V.I. The total value of the offer as a vector of transformation of the company’s digital business model. Current issues of the modern economy. 2022;1:241-249.

14. Moattar H., Bandara W., Kannengiesser U., Rosemann M.  Control flow versus communication: comparing two approaches to process modelling. Business Process Management Journal. 2022;28(2):372-397.

15. Al-Fedaghi S. Antithesis of Object Orientation: Occurrence-Only Modeling Applied in Engineering and Medicine. 2023. URL: https://hal.science/hal-03989344/document

16. Forbrig P., Dittmar A. Managing the complexity of business-process models by personas, stories, and related modelling artifacts. BIR Workshops, 2024. pp. 134-140.

17. Von Olberg P., Strey L. Automatisierte Generierung fachlicher Prozessmodelle basierend auf natürlichsprachlichen Prozessbeschreibungen. Modellierung 2024. pp. 43-59. Model Creation. Potsdam, Germany. 12-15 March 2024/

18. Mezina T.V. The impact of Industry 4.0 on the economy and production / T. V. Mezina, A.V. Zozulya, P. V. Zozulya [et al.]. Bulletin of the University. 2022;2:71-76.

19. Churkin D.A. Factor and industry analysis as a driver for the development of the company’s innovation potential / D. A. Churkin, V. I. Abramov. Modern approaches to the transformation of concepts of state regulation and management in socio-economic systems: proceedings of the 13th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kursk, February 27-28, 2024 of the year.  Kursk: ZAO Universitetskaya Kniga, 2024, pp. 252-258.

20. HSE Digital Transformation: Expectations and Reality. Report. — Moscow, 2022. 219 p. URL: https://4822.digital/upload/iblock/

21. Mugutdinov R.M. Features of digital transformation in industry / R. M. Mugutdinov, A. A. Gorovoy. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2022;48(1):216-225.

22. Wittikh V.A. The principle of complementarity in the science of management processes in society. Bulletin of the Samara State Technical University. Series: Technical Sciences. 2016;4(52):15-21.