DOI: 10.33917/mic-6.125.2025.64-77

This article examines the evolution of views on the scientific organization of labor and trends in the development of modern management ontologies and manager values in modern socio-economic conditions. This paper examines the achievements of Soviet theorists and practitioners of the first period, namely A.K. Gastev, P.M. Kerzhentsev, A.A. Bogdanov, who were the forerunners of modern automation and digitalization of production. The paper shows that among foreign management theorists such as F. Taylor, M. Weber, H. Fayol, H. Gant, H. Ford, P. Drucker and others, great attention was also paid to the scientific organization of work. In particular, Bogdanov’s developments have found practical application in the West in the development of network planning methods. The paper shows that the ideas of A.K. Gastev, P.M. Kerzhentsev, A.A. Bogdanov are still relevant in many ways, for example, on standardization of products, on working conditions, on the rational use of employee and supervisor time. The paper shows that it is the area related to the use of analytical objects that is a promising area of research for modern management. Artificial subjectivity will be the subject of consideration by management schools of the future. It is shown that attention in management theory will shift towards discussing management ontologies and manager values. The relations concern both management itself and managed objects – enterprises, branches of the national economy, the interrelation of industries within the country, the interrelation of industry and the spheres of education, culture, and economics. Moreover, the methods of developing ontologies will not be empirical, but will be deduced theoretically. This is what will inevitably determine a qualitative leap in management theory, and then in the practice of Russian management.

References:

1. Anisimov O.S. 100 shem. OOO Veliky Novgorod Pechatny Dvor, 2013, 156 p.

2. Anisimov O.S. The subjective space in game modeling is the world of psychology. 2015;3 (83):174–182.

3. Bulanova M.B. Gastev Alexey Kapitonovich. In the collection: Sociology of Russia in faces: history and modernity. The encyclopedic edition. Moscow, 2019. pp. 130–131.

4. Bulanova M.B. N. A.K. Gastev and P.M. Kerzhentsev: the experience of reconstructing ideas about the organization of labor. In the collection: IV Gastev readings. Moscow, 2022. pp. 26–31.

5. Verna V.V., Darchich A.V. The culture of working time management: P.M. Kerzhentsev’s contribution to the theory of domestic time management. Tavrichesky studios. 2024;39:9–13.

6. Golubkina T.M., Kulygin I.V. The concept of time management by A.K. Gastev. Economics and entrepreneurship. 2024;2 (163):1034–1036.

7. Elina A.M. Kerzhentsev P.M. on problems of management, theory of organizational activity and scientific organization of labor. In the book: Labor Economics and Ergonomics: theory and Practice. Tambov, 2023. pp. 152–169.

8. Ivankova M.E., Pyagai E.S. Alexey Kapitonovich Gastev. The idea of «social engineering», its relevance in modern organizations. In the collection: Young researcher: challenges and prospects. Moscow, 2024. pp. 232–234.

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.121.2025.90-100

This article examines the organizational and economic aspects of applying the functional management assessment model in conjunction with MVP and GAP analysis to improve quality management of the federal project «Building a network of modern Campuses» in modern conditions. The communication profile of the federal project management methodology was built using a functional management assessment model.

The paper shows that GAP analysis makes it possible to identify discrepancies between the current level of quality of the educational infrastructure and the required level of quality defined by the goals of the federal project. The analysis allows you to identify key areas that require improvements, such as technical equipment, safety, accessibility for people with disabilities, shows that GAP analysis makes it possible to identify discrepancies between the current level of quality of the educational infrastructure and the required level of quality defined by the goals of the federal project. The analysis allows you to identify key areas that require improvements, such as technical equipment, safety, accessibility for people with disabilities, etc. Based on the results of the annals on the results of the analysis of the MVP model of the Mediaplan Information System, the authors came to the conclusion that the necessary quality control principles are embedded in the system and cannot be circumvented, which allows us to reduce the distance between the expectations of the target audience and stakeholders of the project and reality, and in emergency cases promptly implement changes «on the ground».

References:

1. Verstina N.G., Donskaya O.O. Comprehensive analysis of the role of a private partner in the creation of new campuses. Current tasks strategic approach and development – 2023: proceedings of the IV International Scientific Conference. Moscow, 2024. pp. 968-973.

2. Glezin D.D., Sollapov V.I. Application of SWOT and GAP analysis in the study of organizational quality management systems. Scientific Review. 2024;31(5):4177-4182.

3. Zherebtsova A.V., Lisova A.M. Models of life cycles of systems. Full lifecycle management systems for high-tech products in mechanical engineering: new sources of growth: proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. 2018. pp. 78-81.

4. Zapparov B.A., Pashina A.D., Feifer R.L., Abramov D.A. Specifics of economic planning for flexible technological product development at the regional level. Kazan Economic Bulletin. 2019;6 (44):15-19.

5. Krolkova N.A., Bolgova A.M. The possibilities of developing a consortium of minimally viable products (MVP) for large businesses in Russia. the text of the development of the method of strategic management. Issues of psychology and law. 2023;184:163-172.

6. Kuzmin A.M., Vysokovskaya E.A. GAP analysis is one of the most important methods of strategic analysis. Methods of quality management. 2021;12:53.

7. Latkov N.Yu., Ashvanyan S.K., Vidyakin A.V. Decision interview as a way to test a minimally viable product. Competitiveness in the global world: economics, science, technology. 2022;5:45-46.