Author page: Pobyvaev S.A.

The economic strategy of Poland and the Czech Republic as an example of the long-term effectiveness of state strategy

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.127.2026.20-29

The author proceeds from the premise that for developing countries, the highest criterion of state effectiveness is the country’s transition to a new level, joining the ranks of developed countries. Of all the post-socialist bloc countries, Poland and the Czech Republic have achieved this. The author analyzes these cases. Poland implemented a standard set of macroeconomic reforms, and they proved successful thanks to a shift in public thinking: a focus on economic rather than political issues and, as a result, the widespread development of small and medium-sized businesses, which became the driving force of development. The Czech Republic had different starting conditions than Poland. The success of the Czech Republic’s economic breakthrough was determined by the correct actions taken with respect to industrial potential, which was preserved through prudent decisions during privatization and the development of international investment cooperation.

References:

1. Global Governance Indicators. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators/interactive-data-access

2. Kovaleva V., Elistratov A. Historical Review of Economic Transformations in Poland (1990-2020). Journal of Historical Research. 2022;7(1):9-12.

3. Capitalism without Capitalists. Why Poland Was Able to Build Functioning Democratic Institutions. URL: https://lenta.ru/articles/2016/05/19/poland_capitalism/

4. Sinitsina I., Chudakova N. The EU and the Polish Economy: From Adaptation to Integration. Modern Europe. 2006;3:108-123.

5. Gabarta A. Poland: 30 Years of Socioeconomic Transformations and 15 Years of EU Membership. Europe. 2019;7:82-92.

6. Mikhalev O.Yu. Results of the Law and Justice Party’s Stay in Power in Poland. Visegrad Europe. Central European Journal. 2023;4:75-90.

7. European Innovation Scoreboard 2024. Country Data. Poland. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/assets/rtd/eis/2024/

8. Mickiewicz B. Assessment and Directions of Innovative Development of the Polish Economy. Proceedings of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference «Modern Agrarian Economy: Science and Practice». Publisher: Belarusian State Agricultural Academy (Gorki), 2022. pp. 129-133.

9. Large-scale energy project: Poland allocates billions for first nuclear power plant. URL: https://hvylya.net/news/305243-masshtabnyy-energeticheskiy-proekt-polsha-vydelyaet-milliardy-na-pervuyu-aes

10. The Polish government intends to invest 70 billion zlotys in national energy grids. URL: https://www.polskieradio.pl/397/7830/Artykul/

11. Piatkowski Marcin. Poland has become Europe’s growth champion, but can this success continue? URL: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2018/12/17/poland-has-become-europes-growth-champion-but-can-this-success-continue/

12. Alekhnovich A. Lessons from the Privatization of State-Owned Enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe. URL: https://isans.org/ru/articles/uroki-privatizaczii-gospredpriyatij-v-stranah-czve.html

Development institutions, their effectiveness and prospects

DOI: 10.33917/mic-4.117.2024.18-26

The author defines a development institution in relation to domestic realities, and also provides a brief overview of the world experience in the functioning of development institutions. The author points out that until recently, Russian development institutions demonstrated a low degree of efficiency, which necessitated reforms in the area under consideration. However, the reforms did not fully solve the assigned tasks, since the foreign policy situation changed dramatically. It is concluded that the basis for low efficiency is insufficient attention to the relationship between the concepts of «institute» and «institution». The author offers a list of activities that are key to improving the situation in the field of development institutions.

References:

1. Kostin K.B., Khomchenko E.A., Burmistrov A.N., Melikova E.F. Foreign direct investment and transnational corporations as potential factors of economic growth of states. Economic relations. 2021;11(4):633–664.

2. GE Global Innovation Barometer 2018. URL: https://www.ge.com/sites/default/files/GE_Global_Innovation_Barometer_2018-Summary_Report.pdf

3. Mapping 500+ Development Banks Qualification criteria, stylized facts and development trends. URL: https://financeincommon.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/mapping-development-banks.pdf

4. SWFI Total Asset Ratings. URL: https://www.swfinstitute.org/fund-rankings/development-bank

5. Kuzenkova V.M. Concepts of development institutions: a retrospective analysis. Bulletin of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2020;17(1 (109)):40.

6. Monastyrsky E.A., Saklakov V.M. Classification of development institutions. Innovations. 2013;9 (179):65.

7. Sokolov A. Development institutions have failed innovations. Vedomosti, 02.03.2021. URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2021/03/01/859742-instituti-razvitiya

8. Botoroeva E. The effectiveness of development institutions will be assessed by 10 indicators. URL: https://www.pnp.ru/economics/effektivnost-institutov-razvitiya-ocenyat-po-10-pokazatelyam.html

9. Skolkovo approved a new KPI system and indicators for 2024–2026. URL: https://ria.ru/20231225/skolkovo-1917898633.html

10. Petrov A.N., Varlamov K.V., Komarov A.V., Matveev D.A. Efficiency of development institutions. Shift in the paradigm of development institutions in the medium term. Economics of Science. 2017;3(4):234.

11. Putin called for support for development institutions that fell under sanctions. URL: https://360tv.ru/news/vlast/putin-prizval-podderzhat-instituty-razvitija-popavshie-pod-sanktsii/

12. Inshakov O.V. Institution and institution: problems of categorical differentiation and integration. Economic science of modern Russia. 2010;3(50):26–38.

13. Deming W. Edwards, Out of the Crisis, The MIT Press, 1994. 524 p.

14. Towards harmonized management and measurement of impact: The experience of development finance institutions. URL: https://one.oecd.org/document/DCD(2021)30/en/pdf

15. OECD-UNDP Impact Standards for Financing Sustainable DEVELOPMENT OECD, UNDP 2021.