Author page: Chernyshov B.A.

Risk management system in international supply chains under conditions of change

DOI: 10.33917/mic-3.122.2025.15-28

This article examines the methodological aspects of the formation of a risk management system in international commodity supply chains in modern socio-economic conditions. The paper considers the impact of the following risk groups in international commodity supply chains: static (simple), dynamic (speculative) risks, diversification, dissipation, hedging, risk transfer, supplier risks and risks of geopolitical instability.

The issues of risk prevention and mitigation are becoming more and more in demand in international supply chains. Russian companies are forced to take risks in order to achieve their goals, and risk management is designed to optimize the set of risks. In conditions where market economy actors risk not only their own, but also a large number of borrowed funds, the consequences become more acute. In case of failure, not only Russian companies lose, but also their economic infrastructure, in particular, counterparties. That is why Russian companies should pay great attention to the introduction of effective risk management, thanks to which it is possible to identify emerging risks and opportunities in a timely manner, as well as respond to them in a timely manner.

References: 

1. Afendikova E.Yu., Ksenzhuk A.N., Kovaleva V.I. Risk management tools in crisis management of a modern enterprise: identification and classification of risks. In the collection: Eurasian Science. Moscow, 2024. pp. 453-455.

2. Bobrova A.V. Factor analysis of the effectiveness of international commodity supply chains. In the collection: Problems of economic security and customs regulation: the search for effective solutions. South Ural State University. 2023. pp. 30-43.

3. Klimashevich S.V. Digitalization of transport corridors as a promising tool for the development of international supply chains. In the collection: Logistics – the Eurasian bridge. Krasnoyarsk, 2021. pp. 322-325.

4. Kopylova O.A., Mishkurov P.N. Designing a supply chain taking into account the risks of organizing international transportation and general logistical costs. In the collection: Polytransport systems. Novosibirsk, 2024. pp. 103-108.

5. Kostioglo V.Kh., Titovets M.I., Titovets E.I. Supply chain management in conditions of international economic instability. Economics: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2024;14(4-1):796-805.

6. Mesharova E.Y. The impact of sanctions on international supply chains. In the collection: Innovative aspects of service and tourism development. Collection of articles of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2020. pp. 75-79.

7. Mishchishina A.N. Directions of restructuring international supply chains as a basis for socio-economic development of Russia. In the collection: A young researcher. Lipetsk, 2024. pp. 436-439.

8. Mitko O.A. A modern view on the development and planning of supply chains: an international aspect. In the collection: Creative logistics: strategies and technologies. Rostov-on-Don, 2024. pp. 88-92.

System of sources of intellectual property rights as a key tool for protecting intellectual property and stimulating innovation and the development of the global economy

DOI: 10.33917/mic-2.121.2025.24-39

This article examines the methodological aspects of the formation of a system of sources of intellectual property (IP) law as a key tool for protecting intellectual property and stimulating innovation in modern conditions.

It is determined that the practice of the economic judicial Board of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in trademark protection cases should be improved, including with regard to formal requirements for the preparation and consideration of court cases. It is shown that in modern legal practice, trademarks are considered only as legal instruments with which copyright holders have the right to prevent the production and sale of identical or confusingly similar products by opponents. The use of existing means to protect the interests of copyright holders within the framework of the “fuzzy” concept of trademarks allows all business entities and authorities to take a fresh look at trademarks: not only as a legal instrument, but also as an organizational and economic instrument. Intellectual property, as an intangible asset with commercial value, like any object of copyright ownership, can be seriously affected by the actions of third parties. Such damage must be compensated by the copyright holder in court. Thus, violators may be held civilly or criminally liable for the illegal use of such trademarks or service marks. The trademark owner has the right to demand compensation for damages and has the right to publish the court’s decision in the mass media. It should also be noted that trademarks and service marks are a means of personalizing goods and their manufacturers. Trademarks and service marks have different concepts, functions, and types. The legislation of the Russian Federation provides for civil or criminal liability for illegal use. It is shown that the system of sources of intellectual property rights is complex and multilevel.

References:

1. Andrievskaya A.N., Kostornov D.A. Sound trademarks in the system of non-traditional trademarks. Law and management. 2024;12:213-215.

2. Biyukov E. On the issue of the term «trademark use» in relation to the ways of using a trademark on the Internet.  In: Legal Protection of Intellectual property: problems of theory and practice. 2020. pp. 311-317.

3. Bondar I.V. Regulation of the process of using trademarks and termination of legal protection of a trademark. In the collection: Legal problems of the organization of intellectual activity in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2021. pp. 9-13.

4. Bochkova D.K. The possibility of trademark registration in the name of several persons, with the exception of registration of a collective trademark. Colloquium Is A Journal. 2020;4-7 (56):75-77.

5. Burchik S.S. Intellectual property as an intangible asset in the discussion on the abolition of antimonopoly intellectual property immunities in the Russian Federation. Theory and practice of modern science. 2020;7 (61):53-80.