DOI: 10.33917/es-1.205.2026.68-75

At the current stage of socio-economic development, it is becoming increasingly evident that assessing the quality and standard of living plays a key role in the process of forming public policy aimed at improving the population well-being. At the same time, the multitude of existing methodological approaches to such assessment, differing both in the composition of indicators applied and in the methods of their aggregation, indicates the absence of universal standards and generally accepted system of indicators.

References:

1. Otchety OON (Human Development Reports) [UN Reports (Human Development Reports)]. UN, available at: https://hdr.undp.org

2. Better Life Index. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, available at: https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org

3. Rosstat [Website], available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru

4. Andreeva O.N. Uroven’ i kachestvo zhizni: soderzhanie ponyatiy i ikh sostavlyayushchie [Standard and Quality of Life: the Content of Concepts and their Components]. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya, 2020, no 4(23), pp. 68–77.

5. Izmaylova A.S., Shershneva O.I. Pokazateli urovnya zhizni naseleniya Rossii [Standard of Living Indicators of the Population of Russia]. Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya, 2021, no 50-4, pp. 73–75.

6. Tukhuzheva L.A. Kachestvo i uroven’ zhizni naseleniya [Quality and Standard of Living of the Population]. Voprosy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2020, no 29(41), pp. 52–54.

7. Belyaeva L.A. Kachestvo zhizni v sub”ektivnykh otsenkakh naseleniya: Rossiya v evropeyskom kontekste [Quality of Life in Subjective Assessments of the Population: Russia in the European Context]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov, 2020, vol. 18, no 4, pp. 680–694.

8. Zagoruyko A.Yu. Uroven’ i kachestvo zhizni naseleniya kak osnovnoy kriteriy ustoychivogo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya obshchestva [Standard and Quality of Life of the Population as the Main Criterion for Sustainable Socio-Economic Development of Society]. Izd-vo Kurganskoy GSKhA, 2017, 89 p.

9. Petrenko P.V. Mnogofaktornye modeli otsenki blagosostoyaniya: opyt mezhdunarodnykh issledovaniy [Multifactor Models of Welfare Assessment: Experience of International Research]. Ekonomicheskie nauki, 2019, no 12, pp. 12–20.

10. Shumilin E.V. Metodologicheskie problemy formirovaniya integral’nykh indeksov urovnya zhizni v RF [Methodological Problems of Forming Integral Indices of the Standard of Living in the Russian Federation]. Voprosy statistiki, 2022, no 2, pp. 45–59.

DOI: 10.33917/es-5.197.2024.80-89

The article proposes approaches to implementing a system of monitoring pricing processes in the strategy of state regulation and to assessing the effectiveness of such monitoring system. The author synthesizes the key functional blocks of a unified system for monitoring pricing processes and, on their basis, develops appropriate approaches. Such approaches, containing information about some participants in the system, legal acts that will require changes, as well as quantitative and qualitative indicators for assessing performance, demonstrate the potential and scale of a unified system for monitoring pricing processes.

References:

1. Kabmin planiruet vklyuchit’ elektroenergetiku v servis skvoznogo ustanovleniya tarifov na baze “Gostekha” [The Cabinet of Ministers Plans to Include the Electric Power Industry in the End-to-end Tariff Setting Service Based on Gostekh]. Kodeks, 2024, 1 avgusta, available at: https://cntd.ru/news/read/kabminplaniruet-vkliucit-elektroenergetiku-v-servis-skvoznogo-ustanovleniia-tarifov-na-baze-gostexa

2. Kovalev A.V. Formirovanie mekhanizma regulirovaniya protsessov tsenoobrazovaniya v sovremennoy ekonomike [Formation of a Mechanism for Regulating Pricing in the Modern Economy]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2023, no 3, pp. 136–143, DOI: https://doi.org/10.33917/es-3.189.2023.136-143

3. Kovalev A.V., Orlova L.N., Domkin P.A., Sokolov S.M. Dialektika tseny i kontseptsiya sozdaniya edinoy sistemy monitoringa protsessov tsenoobrazovaniya v ekonomike: Monografiya [Dialectics of price and the Concept of Creating a Unified System for Monitoring Pricing Processes in the Economy: Monograph]. Moscow, INFRA-M, 2021, 189 p.

4. Afanas’ev M.P., Shash N.N. Instrumentariy otsenki effektivnosti byudzhetnykh program [Tools for Assessing the Effectiveness of Budget Programs]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya, 2013, no 3, pp. 48–69.

5. Gorshenin A.N., Gorshenina E.V. Klyuchevye pokazateli deyatel’nosti: ot strategii k real’no rabotayushchim pokazatelyam [Key Performance Indicators: from Strategy to Real-world Performance Indicators]. Ekonomicheskie issledovaniya, 2014, no 1.

6. Eremina G.A., Sobol’ O.V. Mesto izmereniya effektivnosti deyatel’nosti v sisteme upravleniya organizatsiey [The Place of Performance Measurement in the Organization’s Management System]. Upravlenie personalom i intellektual’nymi resursami v Rossii, 2017, vol. 6, no 2, pp. 29–33.

7. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. Organizatsiya, orientirovannaya na strategiyu. Kak v novoy biznes-srede preuspevayut organizatsii, primenyayushchie sbalansirovannuyu sistemu pokazateley [The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Organizations Are Succeeding in the New Business Environment]. Moscow, Olimp-Biznes, 2004, XVIII, 392 p. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Natsional’noy elektronnoy biblioteki, available at: https://rusneb.ru/ catalog/000199_000009_002428994/

8. Neely A., Mills J., Platts K., Richards H., Gregory M., Bourne M., Kennerley M. Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2000, vol. 20, no 10, pp. 1119–1145.