DOI: 10.33917/es-1.205.2026.68-75

At the current stage of socio-economic development, it is becoming increasingly evident that assessing the quality and standard of living plays a key role in the process of forming public policy aimed at improving the population well-being. At the same time, the multitude of existing methodological approaches to such assessment, differing both in the composition of indicators applied and in the methods of their aggregation, indicates the absence of universal standards and generally accepted system of indicators.

References:

1. Otchety OON (Human Development Reports) [UN Reports (Human Development Reports)]. UN, available at: https://hdr.undp.org

2. Better Life Index. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, available at: https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org

3. Rosstat [Website], available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru

4. Andreeva O.N. Uroven’ i kachestvo zhizni: soderzhanie ponyatiy i ikh sostavlyayushchie [Standard and Quality of Life: the Content of Concepts and their Components]. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya, 2020, no 4(23), pp. 68–77.

5. Izmaylova A.S., Shershneva O.I. Pokazateli urovnya zhizni naseleniya Rossii [Standard of Living Indicators of the Population of Russia]. Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya, 2021, no 50-4, pp. 73–75.

6. Tukhuzheva L.A. Kachestvo i uroven’ zhizni naseleniya [Quality and Standard of Living of the Population]. Voprosy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2020, no 29(41), pp. 52–54.

7. Belyaeva L.A. Kachestvo zhizni v sub”ektivnykh otsenkakh naseleniya: Rossiya v evropeyskom kontekste [Quality of Life in Subjective Assessments of the Population: Russia in the European Context]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov, 2020, vol. 18, no 4, pp. 680–694.

8. Zagoruyko A.Yu. Uroven’ i kachestvo zhizni naseleniya kak osnovnoy kriteriy ustoychivogo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya obshchestva [Standard and Quality of Life of the Population as the Main Criterion for Sustainable Socio-Economic Development of Society]. Izd-vo Kurganskoy GSKhA, 2017, 89 p.

9. Petrenko P.V. Mnogofaktornye modeli otsenki blagosostoyaniya: opyt mezhdunarodnykh issledovaniy [Multifactor Models of Welfare Assessment: Experience of International Research]. Ekonomicheskie nauki, 2019, no 12, pp. 12–20.

10. Shumilin E.V. Metodologicheskie problemy formirovaniya integral’nykh indeksov urovnya zhizni v RF [Methodological Problems of Forming Integral Indices of the Standard of Living in the Russian Federation]. Voprosy statistiki, 2022, no 2, pp. 45–59.

DOI: 10.33917/es-5.203.2025.52-57

The article examines conceptual foundations and practical aspects of improving institutional mechanisms aimed at strengthening the innovative component of economic growth and creating favourable conditions for a long-term increase of the profit rate in high-tech industries.

References:

1. Marks K. Kapital. Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii. T. 1. Protsess proizvodstva kapitala [Capital. Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. The Process of Capital Production]. Translated from German. Moscow, Politizdat, 1960, 784 ps.

2. Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations]. Translated from English. Moscow, Eksmo, 2007, 960 p.

3. Isterli V. V poiskakh rosta: Priklyucheniya i zloklyucheniya ekonomistov v tropikakh [In Search of Growth: The Adventures and Misadventures of Economists in the Tropics]. Translated from English. Moscow, Institut kompleksnykh strategicheskikh issledovaniy, 2006, 360 p.

4. Dement’ev V.V., Shcherbakov A.P. Pribyl’ i ekonomicheskiy rost [Profit and Economic Growth]. Terra Economicus, 2017, vol. 15, no 3, pp. 75–91.

5. Keyns Dzh. M. Obshchaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg [The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money]. Translated from English. Moscow, Gelios ARV, 2011, 352 p.

6. Shumpeter Y.A. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: issledovanie predprinimatel’skoy pribyli, kapitala, kredita, protsenta i tsikla kon”yunktury [Theory of Economic Development: A Study of Entrepreneurial Profit, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle]. Translated from German. Moscow, Progress, 1982, 455 p.

7. Nort D. Instituty, institutsional’nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and the Functioning of the Economy]. Translated from English. Moscow, Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi “Nachala”, 1997, 180 p.

8. Nayt F.Kh. Risk, neopredelennost’ i pribyl’ [Risk, Uncertainty and Reward]. Translated from English. Moscow, Delo, 2003, 360 p.