Some Aspects of Creating Artificial Intelligence and Implementing Transhumanism Ideas
The authors considered some aspects of the development of artificial intelligence (AI), the possibility of the emergence of artificial intelligence and the transfer of consciousness to a new substantive carrier as one of the goals of the transhumanism movement. It is shown that the basis for the development of artificial intelligence is formalized (mathematical) logic, while the activity of the human mind (organic unity of consciousness, subconscious and unconscious), the logic of its functioning can not be mathematical formalization. In this regard, the authors believe that the most promising is the concentration of scientific efforts in research on the development of superintelligence. In this case, perhaps the most effective may be artificial intelligent systems that use a set of hybrid mathematical logic
References:
|
1. Burmistrov A.N., Il’in Yu.V. O vozmozhnom vliyanii vzaimodeistviya proizvoditel’nykh sil i proizvodstvennykh otnoshenii na razvitie nauki i tekhniki [On the Possible Impact of Productive Forces Interaction with Production Relations on the Science and Technology Development]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2018, no 7, pp. 146–157. 2. Otchet Vsemirnogo ekonomicheskogo foruma – 2018. Revolyutsiya robotov [World Economic Forum Report 2018. Robot Revolution]. NNN. Nano News Net, 2018, September, 22, available at: http://www.nanonewsnet.ru/news/2018/budushchee-rabochikh-mest-glavnoe-iz-otcheta-vsemirnogo-ekonomicheskogoforuma. 3. Skiba I.R. Problema iskusstvennogo intellekta: chelovek i mashina [The Problem of Artificial Intelligence: Man and Machine]. Neoronus.com, 2018, April, 29, available at: https://neuronus.com/stat/1392-problema-iskusstvennogo-intellekta-chelovek-i-mashina.html. 4. Kholevo A.S. Kvantovyi predel informatsii [Quantum Limit of Information]. Stimul, 2016, available at: https://stimul.online/articles/interview/kvantovyypredel-informatsii/ 5. Penrouz R. Novyi um korolya [The King’s New Mind]. Moscow, URSS, 2003, p. 12. 6. Losev A.F. Sobr. soch. T.6. Khaos i struktura. K logicheskomu obosnovaniyu aksiomatiki transfinitov [Chaos and Structure. To the Rationale of the Axiomatic Transfinite]. Moscow, Mysl’, 1997, p. 212. 7. Il’enkov E.V. Dialekticheskaya logika. Ocherki istorii i teorii [Dialectical Logic. Essays on History and Theory]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1984, pp. 12, 164. 8. Batishchev G.S. Dialektika refleksivnoi deyatel’nosti I nauchnoe poznanie [Dialectics of Reflexive Activity and Scientific Cognition]. Rostov n/D, Izd-vo Rostovskogo un-ta, 1983, p. 42. 9. Lobastov G.V. Filosofiya v prostranstve nauki i kul’tury [Philosophy in the Space of Science and Culture]. Ust’-Kamenogorsk: MON RK, 2017, p. 55. 10. Batishchev G.S. Vozrazhenie E.V. Il’enkovu: pochemu antimoniya razluchaetsya s istinoi [E.V. Ilenkova. Objection: Why Antimony be Separated from the Truth]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1979. 11. Ivankov K.V. Formal’nye osnovy dialektiki [Formal Framework of Dialectics]. Materialy seminara “Geometriya I fizika” [Seminar “Geometry and Physics” of the Physics Department of Moscow State University]. Moscow, fizicheskii fakul’tet MGU, 2014. March, 13, available at: http://kivankov.ru/articles/dialectica_formalizm.pdf. 12. Karpenko A.S. K opredeleniyu logicheskogo: traditsii I sovremennyi vzglyad [To Definition of Logical: Traditions and Modern Look]. Vestnik VGGU, 2007, vyp. 19, p. 12. 13. Lobastov G.V. V poiskakh novoi teorii soznaniya. Dialektika i problemy razvitiya nauki [In Search of a New Theory of Consciousness]. Ch. 2. Ust’-Kamenogorsk MON RK, 2017, p. 58. 14. Zhdanov A.A. Adaptivnye mashiny — neizbezhnoe napravlenie razvitiya tekhniki. Zadachi i problemy: Lektsii po neiroinformatike [Adaptive Machines are the Inevitable Direction of Technology Development. Tasks and Problems. Lectures on Neuro-Informatics]. Moscow, NIYaU MIFI, 2010, pp. 210, 211. 15. Redozubov A. Logika soznaniya [Logic of Consciousness]. Habr, 2016, August, 22, available at: https://habr.com/ru/post/308268/ 16. Chernigovskaya T.V. Tvorchestvo kak prednaznachenie mozga. Filosofiya tvorchestva. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Creativity as the Destination of the Brain. Philosophy of Creativity: Materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference]. Pod red. N.M. Smirnovoi, A.Yu. Alekseeva. Moscow, In-t filosofii RAN, 2016, pp. 57–67. 17. Manifest strategicheskogo obshchestvennogo dvizheniya “Rossiya-2045” [Manifest of Strategic Public Movement “Russia–2045”]. Rossiya-2045, 2011, August, 22, available at: http://www.2045.ru/manifest/ 18. Formula Dreika [Drake’s Formula]. Akademik, available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/1168646. 19. Ulasovich K. Veroyatnost’ sushchestvovaniya inoplanetnykh tsivilizatsii sveli do dvukh mnozhitelei [The Probability of the Existence of Alien Civilizations was Reduced to Two Multipliers]. N+1, 2016, April, 29, available at: https://nplus1.ru/news/2016/04/29/the-truth-is-out-there. 20. Kowald A. Why is there no von Neumann probe on Ceres? Error catastrophe can explain the Fermi-Hart Paradox. Cornell University: arXiv.org. 2016, April, 13, available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.02169. 21. Bostrom N. Iskusstvennyi intellekt. Etapy. Ugrozy. Strategii [Artificial Intelligence. Stages. Threats Strategies]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Feber, 2016, p. 182. |