There is much in common between the concepts of “technological order”, “engineering approach”, “mode of production”, “development phase”, “socio-economic formation”. In all cases we are talking about identifying certain successive stages of the civilization evolution, at that analysis is based on the production process. If such a study is retrospective, it undoubtedly refers to Marxist historiosophy and represents a meaningful attempt to give meaning to history. If the analysis has got promising, prognostic character, if it draws new ways of developing society and discusses other types of resources and other geography of conflicts, we are no longer dealing with history and philosophy, but with politics, with the struggle for redistributing markets and highly likely war.
- Pereslegin S., Pereslegina E. i dr. Novye karty budushchego [New Maps of the Future]. Moscow, 2009.
- Pereslegin S., Pereslegina E., Lukovnikova N. i dr. Inzhenernaya ontologiya. Inzheneriya kak stranstvie [Engineering Ontology. Engineering as a Pilgrimage]. Ekaterinburg, ID “Azhur”, 2013, 280 p.
- Pereslegin S. Rossiiskoe zakonodatel’stvo kak BigData [Russian Legislation as BigData]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2018, no 4, pp. 52–61.
- Pereslegin S. Problema strategirovaniya razvitiya nauchnykh issledovanii RF v svete trebovanii Federal’nogo zakona N 172-FZ “O strategicheskom planirovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii” [The Problem of Strategizing Scientific Research Development in the Russian Federation]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2017, no 1, pp. 60–71.